1Switch(3)             User Contributed Perl Documentation            Switch(3)
2
3
4

NAME

6       Switch - A switch statement for Perl
7

SYNOPSIS

9           use Switch;
10
11           switch ($val) {
12               case 1          { print "number 1" }
13               case "a"        { print "string a" }
14               case [1..10,42] { print "number in list" }
15               case (\@array)  { print "number in list" }
16               case /\w+/      { print "pattern" }
17               case qr/\w+/    { print "pattern" }
18               case (\%hash)   { print "entry in hash" }
19               case (\&sub)    { print "arg to subroutine" }
20               else            { print "previous case not true" }
21           }
22

BACKGROUND

24       [Skip ahead to "DESCRIPTION" if you don't care about the whys and
25       wherefores of this control structure]
26
27       In seeking to devise a "Swiss Army" case mechanism suitable for Perl,
28       it is useful to generalize this notion of distributed conditional
29       testing as far as possible. Specifically, the concept of "matching"
30       between the switch value and the various case values need not be
31       restricted to numeric (or string or referential) equality, as it is in
32       other languages. Indeed, as Table 1 illustrates, Perl offers at least
33       eighteen different ways in which two values could generate a match.
34
35               Table 1: Matching a switch value ($s) with a case value ($c)
36
37               Switch  Case    Type of Match Implied   Matching Code
38               Value   Value
39               ======  =====   =====================   =============
40
41               number  same    numeric or referential  match if $s == $c;
42               or ref          equality
43
44               object  method  result of method call   match if $s->$c();
45               ref     name                            match if defined $s->$c();
46                       or ref
47
48               other   other   string equality         match if $s eq $c;
49               non-ref non-ref
50               scalar  scalar
51
52               string  regexp  pattern match           match if $s =~ /$c/;
53
54               array   scalar  array entry existence   match if 0<=$c && $c<@$s;
55               ref             array entry definition  match if defined $s->[$c];
56                               array entry truth       match if $s->[$c];
57
58               array   array   array intersection      match if intersects(@$s, @$c);
59               ref     ref     (apply this table to
60                                all pairs of elements
61                                $s->[$i] and
62                                $c->[$j])
63
64               array   regexp  array grep              match if grep /$c/, @$s;
65               ref
66
67               hash    scalar  hash entry existence    match if exists $s->{$c};
68               ref             hash entry definition   match if defined $s->{$c};
69                               hash entry truth        match if $s->{$c};
70
71               hash    regexp  hash grep               match if grep /$c/, keys %$s;
72               ref
73
74               sub     scalar  return value defn       match if defined $s->($c);
75               ref             return value truth      match if $s->($c);
76
77               sub     array   return value defn       match if defined $s->(@$c);
78               ref     ref     return value truth      match if $s->(@$c);
79
80       In reality, Table 1 covers 31 alternatives, because only the equality
81       and intersection tests are commutative; in all other cases, the roles
82       of the $s and $c variables could be reversed to produce a different
83       test. For example, instead of testing a single hash for the existence
84       of a series of keys ("match if exists $s->{$c}"), one could test for
85       the existence of a single key in a series of hashes ("match if exists
86       $c->{$s}").
87

DESCRIPTION

89       The Switch.pm module implements a generalized case mechanism that
90       covers most (but not all) of the numerous possible combinations of
91       switch and case values described above.
92
93       The module augments the standard Perl syntax with two new control
94       statements: "switch" and "case". The "switch" statement takes a single
95       scalar argument of any type, specified in parentheses.  "switch" stores
96       this value as the current switch value in a (localized) control
97       variable.  The value is followed by a block which may contain one or
98       more Perl statements (including the "case" statement described below).
99       The block is unconditionally executed once the switch value has been
100       cached.
101
102       A "case" statement takes a single scalar argument (in mandatory
103       parentheses if it's a variable; otherwise the parens are optional) and
104       selects the appropriate type of matching between that argument and the
105       current switch value. The type of matching used is determined by the
106       respective types of the switch value and the "case" argument, as
107       specified in Table 1. If the match is successful, the mandatory block
108       associated with the "case" statement is executed.
109
110       In most other respects, the "case" statement is semantically identical
111       to an "if" statement. For example, it can be followed by an "else"
112       clause, and can be used as a postfix statement qualifier.
113
114       However, when a "case" block has been executed control is automatically
115       transferred to the statement after the immediately enclosing "switch"
116       block, rather than to the next statement within the block. In other
117       words, the success of any "case" statement prevents other cases in the
118       same scope from executing. But see "Allowing fall-through" below.
119
120       Together these two new statements provide a fully generalized case
121       mechanism:
122
123               use Switch;
124
125               # AND LATER...
126
127               %special = ( woohoo => 1,  d'oh => 1 );
128
129               while (<>) {
130                   chomp;
131                   switch ($_) {
132                       case (%special) { print "homer\n"; }      # if $special{$_}
133                       case /[a-z]/i   { print "alpha\n"; }      # if $_ =~ /a-z/i
134                       case [1..9]     { print "small num\n"; }  # if $_ in [1..9]
135                       case { $_[0] >= 10 } { print "big num\n"; } # if $_ >= 10
136                       print "must be punctuation\n" case /\W/;  # if $_ ~= /\W/
137                   }
138               }
139
140       Note that "switch"es can be nested within "case" (or any other) blocks,
141       and a series of "case" statements can try different types of matches --
142       hash membership, pattern match, array intersection, simple equality,
143       etc. -- against the same switch value.
144
145       The use of intersection tests against an array reference is
146       particularly useful for aggregating integral cases:
147
148               sub classify_digit
149               {
150                       switch ($_[0]) { case 0            { return 'zero' }
151                                        case [2,4,6,8]    { return 'even' }
152                                        case [1,3,5,7,9]  { return 'odd' }
153                                        case /[A-F]/i     { return 'hex' }
154                                      }
155               }
156
157   Allowing fall-through
158       Fall-though (trying another case after one has already succeeded) is
159       usually a Bad Idea in a switch statement. However, this is Perl, not a
160       police state, so there is a way to do it, if you must.
161
162       If a "case" block executes an untargeted "next", control is immediately
163       transferred to the statement after the "case" statement (i.e. usually
164       another case), rather than out of the surrounding "switch" block.
165
166       For example:
167
168               switch ($val) {
169                       case 1      { handle_num_1(); next }    # and try next case...
170                       case "1"    { handle_str_1(); next }    # and try next case...
171                       case [0..9] { handle_num_any(); }       # and we're done
172                       case /\d/   { handle_dig_any(); next }  # and try next case...
173                       case /.*/   { handle_str_any(); next }  # and try next case...
174               }
175
176       If $val held the number 1, the above "switch" block would call the
177       first three "handle_..." subroutines, jumping to the next case test
178       each time it encountered a "next". After the third "case" block was
179       executed, control would jump to the end of the enclosing "switch"
180       block.
181
182       On the other hand, if $val held 10, then only the last two "handle_..."
183       subroutines would be called.
184
185       Note that this mechanism allows the notion of conditional fall-through.
186       For example:
187
188               switch ($val) {
189                       case [0..9] { handle_num_any(); next if $val < 7; }
190                       case /\d/   { handle_dig_any(); }
191               }
192
193       If an untargeted "last" statement is executed in a case block, this
194       immediately transfers control out of the enclosing "switch" block (in
195       other words, there is an implicit "last" at the end of each normal
196       "case" block). Thus the previous example could also have been written:
197
198               switch ($val) {
199                       case [0..9] { handle_num_any(); last if $val >= 7; next; }
200                       case /\d/   { handle_dig_any(); }
201               }
202
203   Automating fall-through
204       In situations where case fall-through should be the norm, rather than
205       an exception, an endless succession of terminal "next"s is tedious and
206       ugly.  Hence, it is possible to reverse the default behaviour by
207       specifying the string "fallthrough" when importing the module. For
208       example, the following code is equivalent to the first example in
209       "Allowing fall-through":
210
211               use Switch 'fallthrough';
212
213               switch ($val) {
214                       case 1      { handle_num_1(); }
215                       case "1"    { handle_str_1(); }
216                       case [0..9] { handle_num_any(); last }
217                       case /\d/   { handle_dig_any(); }
218                       case /.*/   { handle_str_any(); }
219               }
220
221       Note the explicit use of a "last" to preserve the non-fall-through
222       behaviour of the third case.
223
224   Alternative syntax
225       Perl 6 will provide a built-in switch statement with essentially the
226       same semantics as those offered by Switch.pm, but with a different pair
227       of keywords. In Perl 6 "switch" will be spelled "given", and "case"
228       will be pronounced "when". In addition, the "when" statement will not
229       require switch or case values to be parenthesized.
230
231       This future syntax is also (largely) available via the Switch.pm
232       module, by importing it with the argument "Perl6".  For example:
233
234               use Switch 'Perl6';
235
236               given ($val) {
237                       when 1       { handle_num_1(); }
238                       when ($str1) { handle_str_1(); }
239                       when [0..9]  { handle_num_any(); last }
240                       when /\d/    { handle_dig_any(); }
241                       when /.*/    { handle_str_any(); }
242                       default      { handle anything else; }
243               }
244
245       Note that scalars still need to be parenthesized, since they would be
246       ambiguous in Perl 5.
247
248       Note too that you can mix and match both syntaxes by importing the
249       module with:
250
251               use Switch 'Perl5', 'Perl6';
252
253   Higher-order Operations
254       One situation in which "switch" and "case" do not provide a good
255       substitute for a cascaded "if", is where a switch value needs to be
256       tested against a series of conditions. For example:
257
258               sub beverage {
259                   switch (shift) {
260                       case { $_[0] < 10 } { return 'milk' }
261                       case { $_[0] < 20 } { return 'coke' }
262                       case { $_[0] < 30 } { return 'beer' }
263                       case { $_[0] < 40 } { return 'wine' }
264                       case { $_[0] < 50 } { return 'malt' }
265                       case { $_[0] < 60 } { return 'Moet' }
266                       else                { return 'milk' }
267                   }
268               }
269
270       (This is equivalent to writing "case (sub { $_[0] < 10 })", etc.; $_[0]
271       is the argument to the anonymous subroutine.)
272
273       The need to specify each condition as a subroutine block is tiresome.
274       To overcome this, when importing Switch.pm, a special "placeholder"
275       subroutine named "__" [sic] may also be imported. This subroutine
276       converts (almost) any expression in which it appears to a reference to
277       a higher-order function. That is, the expression:
278
279               use Switch '__';
280
281               __ < 2
282
283       is equivalent to:
284
285               sub { $_[0] < 2 }
286
287       With "__", the previous ugly case statements can be rewritten:
288
289               case  __ < 10  { return 'milk' }
290               case  __ < 20  { return 'coke' }
291               case  __ < 30  { return 'beer' }
292               case  __ < 40  { return 'wine' }
293               case  __ < 50  { return 'malt' }
294               case  __ < 60  { return 'Moet' }
295               else           { return 'milk' }
296
297       The "__" subroutine makes extensive use of operator overloading to
298       perform its magic. All operations involving __ are overloaded to
299       produce an anonymous subroutine that implements a lazy version of the
300       original operation.
301
302       The only problem is that operator overloading does not allow the
303       boolean operators "&&" and "||" to be overloaded. So a case statement
304       like this:
305
306               case  0 <= __ && __ < 10  { return 'digit' }
307
308       doesn't act as expected, because when it is executed, it constructs two
309       higher order subroutines and then treats the two resulting references
310       as arguments to "&&":
311
312               sub { 0 <= $_[0] } && sub { $_[0] < 10 }
313
314       This boolean expression is inevitably true, since both references are
315       non-false. Fortunately, the overloaded 'bool' operator catches this
316       situation and flags it as an error.
317

DEPENDENCIES

319       The module is implemented using Filter::Util::Call and Text::Balanced
320       and requires both these modules to be installed.
321

AUTHOR

323       Damian Conway (damian@conway.org). This module is now maintained by
324       Rafael Garcia-Suarez (rgarciasuarez@gmail.com) and more generally by
325       the Perl 5 Porters (perl5-porters@perl.org), as part of the Perl core.
326

BUGS

328       There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky
329       :-) Bug reports and other feedback are most welcome.
330

LIMITATIONS

332       Due to the heuristic nature of Switch.pm's source parsing, the presence
333       of regexes with embedded newlines that are specified with raw "/.../"
334       delimiters and don't have a modifier "//x" are indistinguishable from
335       code chunks beginning with the division operator "/". As a workaround
336       you must use "m/.../" or "m?...?" for such patterns. Also, the presence
337       of regexes specified with raw "?...?" delimiters may cause mysterious
338       errors. The workaround is to use "m?...?" instead.
339
340       Due to the way source filters work in Perl, you can't use Switch inside
341       an string "eval".
342
343       If your source file is longer then 1 million characters and you have a
344       switch statement that crosses the 1 million (or 2 million, etc.)
345       character boundary you will get mysterious errors. The workaround is to
346       use smaller source files.
347
349           Copyright (c) 1997-2008, Damian Conway. All Rights Reserved.
350           This module is free software. It may be used, redistributed
351               and/or modified under the same terms as Perl itself.
352
353
354
355perl v5.16.3                      2014-06-10                         Switch(3)
Impressum