1PERLHACK(1)            Perl Programmers Reference Guide            PERLHACK(1)
2
3
4

NAME

6       perlhack - How to hack at the Perl internals
7

DESCRIPTION

9       This document attempts to explain how Perl development takes place, and
10       ends with some suggestions for people wanting to become bona fide
11       porters.
12
13       The perl5-porters mailing list is where the Perl standard distribution
14       is maintained and developed.  The list can get anywhere from 10 to 150
15       messages a day, depending on the heatedness of the debate.  Most days
16       there are two or three patches, extensions, features, or bugs being
17       discussed at a time.
18
19       A searchable archive of the list is at either:
20
21           http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/
22
23       or
24
25           http://archive.develooper.com/perl5-porters@perl.org/
26
27       List subscribers (the porters themselves) come in several flavours.
28       Some are quiet curious lurkers, who rarely pitch in and instead watch
29       the ongoing development to ensure they're forewarned of new changes or
30       features in Perl.  Some are representatives of vendors, who are there
31       to make sure that Perl continues to compile and work on their
32       platforms.  Some patch any reported bug that they know how to fix, some
33       are actively patching their pet area (threads, Win32, the regexp
34       engine), while others seem to do nothing but complain.  In other words,
35       it's your usual mix of technical people.
36
37       Over this group of porters presides Larry Wall.  He has the final word
38       in what does and does not change in the Perl language.  Various
39       releases of Perl are shepherded by a "pumpking", a porter responsible
40       for gathering patches, deciding on a patch-by-patch, feature-by-feature
41       basis what will and will not go into the release.  For instance,
42       Gurusamy Sarathy was the pumpking for the 5.6 release of Perl, and
43       Jarkko Hietaniemi was the pumpking for the 5.8 release, and Rafael
44       Garcia-Suarez holds the pumpking crown for the 5.10 release.
45
46       In addition, various people are pumpkings for different things.  For
47       instance, Andy Dougherty and Jarkko Hietaniemi did a grand job as the
48       Configure pumpkin up till the 5.8 release. For the 5.10 release
49       H.Merijn Brand took over.
50
51       Larry sees Perl development along the lines of the US government:
52       there's the Legislature (the porters), the Executive branch (the
53       pumpkings), and the Supreme Court (Larry).  The legislature can discuss
54       and submit patches to the executive branch all they like, but the
55       executive branch is free to veto them.  Rarely, the Supreme Court will
56       side with the executive branch over the legislature, or the legislature
57       over the executive branch.  Mostly, however, the legislature and the
58       executive branch are supposed to get along and work out their
59       differences without impeachment or court cases.
60
61       You might sometimes see reference to Rule 1 and Rule 2.  Larry's power
62       as Supreme Court is expressed in The Rules:
63
64       1.  Larry is always by definition right about how Perl should behave.
65           This means he has final veto power on the core functionality.
66
67       2.  Larry is allowed to change his mind about any matter at a later
68           date, regardless of whether he previously invoked Rule 1.
69
70       Got that?  Larry is always right, even when he was wrong.  It's rare to
71       see either Rule exercised, but they are often alluded to.
72
73       New features and extensions to the language are contentious, because
74       the criteria used by the pumpkings, Larry, and other porters to decide
75       which features should be implemented and incorporated are not codified
76       in a few small design goals as with some other languages.  Instead, the
77       heuristics are flexible and often difficult to fathom.  Here is one
78       person's list, roughly in decreasing order of importance, of heuristics
79       that new features have to be weighed against:
80
81       Does concept match the general goals of Perl?
82           These haven't been written anywhere in stone, but one approximation
83           is:
84
85            1. Keep it fast, simple, and useful.
86            2. Keep features/concepts as orthogonal as possible.
87            3. No arbitrary limits (platforms, data sizes, cultures).
88            4. Keep it open and exciting to use/patch/advocate Perl everywhere.
89            5. Either assimilate new technologies, or build bridges to them.
90
91       Where is the implementation?
92           All the talk in the world is useless without an implementation.  In
93           almost every case, the person or people who argue for a new feature
94           will be expected to be the ones who implement it.  Porters capable
95           of coding new features have their own agendas, and are not
96           available to implement your (possibly good) idea.
97
98       Backwards compatibility
99           It's a cardinal sin to break existing Perl programs.  New warnings
100           are contentious--some say that a program that emits warnings is not
101           broken, while others say it is.  Adding keywords has the potential
102           to break programs, changing the meaning of existing token sequences
103           or functions might break programs.
104
105       Could it be a module instead?
106           Perl 5 has extension mechanisms, modules and XS, specifically to
107           avoid the need to keep changing the Perl interpreter.  You can
108           write modules that export functions, you can give those functions
109           prototypes so they can be called like built-in functions, you can
110           even write XS code to mess with the runtime data structures of the
111           Perl interpreter if you want to implement really complicated
112           things.  If it can be done in a module instead of in the core, it's
113           highly unlikely to be added.
114
115       Is the feature generic enough?
116           Is this something that only the submitter wants added to the
117           language, or would it be broadly useful?  Sometimes, instead of
118           adding a feature with a tight focus, the porters might decide to
119           wait until someone implements the more generalized feature.  For
120           instance, instead of implementing a "delayed evaluation" feature,
121           the porters are waiting for a macro system that would permit
122           delayed evaluation and much more.
123
124       Does it potentially introduce new bugs?
125           Radical rewrites of large chunks of the Perl interpreter have the
126           potential to introduce new bugs.  The smaller and more localized
127           the change, the better.
128
129       Does it preclude other desirable features?
130           A patch is likely to be rejected if it closes off future avenues of
131           development.  For instance, a patch that placed a true and final
132           interpretation on prototypes is likely to be rejected because there
133           are still options for the future of prototypes that haven't been
134           addressed.
135
136       Is the implementation robust?
137           Good patches (tight code, complete, correct) stand more chance of
138           going in.  Sloppy or incorrect patches might be placed on the back
139           burner until the pumpking has time to fix, or might be discarded
140           altogether without further notice.
141
142       Is the implementation generic enough to be portable?
143           The worst patches make use of a system-specific features.  It's
144           highly unlikely that non-portable additions to the Perl language
145           will be accepted.
146
147       Is the implementation tested?
148           Patches which change behaviour (fixing bugs or introducing new
149           features) must include regression tests to verify that everything
150           works as expected.  Without tests provided by the original author,
151           how can anyone else changing perl in the future be sure that they
152           haven't unwittingly broken the behaviour the patch implements? And
153           without tests, how can the patch's author be confident that his/her
154           hard work put into the patch won't be accidentally thrown away by
155           someone in the future?
156
157       Is there enough documentation?
158           Patches without documentation are probably ill-thought out or
159           incomplete.  Nothing can be added without documentation, so
160           submitting a patch for the appropriate manpages as well as the
161           source code is always a good idea.
162
163       Is there another way to do it?
164           Larry said "Although the Perl Slogan is There's More Than One Way
165           to Do It, I hesitate to make 10 ways to do something".  This is a
166           tricky heuristic to navigate, though--one man's essential addition
167           is another man's pointless cruft.
168
169       Does it create too much work?
170           Work for the pumpking, work for Perl programmers, work for module
171           authors, ...  Perl is supposed to be easy.
172
173       Patches speak louder than words
174           Working code is always preferred to pie-in-the-sky ideas.  A patch
175           to add a feature stands a much higher chance of making it to the
176           language than does a random feature request, no matter how
177           fervently argued the request might be.  This ties into "Will it be
178           useful?", as the fact that someone took the time to make the patch
179           demonstrates a strong desire for the feature.
180
181       If you're on the list, you might hear the word "core" bandied around.
182       It refers to the standard distribution.  "Hacking on the core" means
183       you're changing the C source code to the Perl interpreter.  "A core
184       module" is one that ships with Perl.
185
186   Keeping in sync
187       The source code to the Perl interpreter, in its different versions, is
188       kept in a repository managed by the git revision control system. The
189       pumpkings and a few others have write access to the repository to check
190       in changes.
191
192       How to clone and use the git perl repository is described in
193       perlrepository.
194
195       You can also choose to use rsync to get a copy of the current source
196       tree for the bleadperl branch and all maintenance branches:
197
198           $ rsync -avz rsync://perl5.git.perl.org/perl-current .
199           $ rsync -avz rsync://perl5.git.perl.org/perl-5.12.x .
200           $ rsync -avz rsync://perl5.git.perl.org/perl-5.10.x .
201           $ rsync -avz rsync://perl5.git.perl.org/perl-5.8.x .
202           $ rsync -avz rsync://perl5.git.perl.org/perl-5.6.x .
203           $ rsync -avz rsync://perl5.git.perl.org/perl-5.005xx .
204
205       (Add the "--delete" option to remove leftover files)
206
207       To get a full list of the available sync points:
208
209           $ rsync perl5.git.perl.org::
210
211       You may also want to subscribe to the perl5-changes mailing list to
212       receive a copy of each patch that gets submitted to the maintenance and
213       development "branches" of the perl repository.  See
214       http://lists.perl.org/ for subscription information.
215
216       If you are a member of the perl5-porters mailing list, it is a good
217       thing to keep in touch with the most recent changes. If not only to
218       verify if what you would have posted as a bug report isn't already
219       solved in the most recent available perl development branch, also known
220       as perl-current, bleading edge perl, bleedperl or bleadperl.
221
222       Needless to say, the source code in perl-current is usually in a
223       perpetual state of evolution.  You should expect it to be very buggy.
224       Do not use it for any purpose other than testing and development.
225
226   Perlbug administration
227       There is a single remote administrative interface for modifying bug
228       status, category, open issues etc. using the RT bugtracker system,
229       maintained by Robert Spier.  Become an administrator, and close any
230       bugs you can get your sticky mitts on:
231
232               http://bugs.perl.org/
233
234       To email the bug system administrators:
235
236               "perlbug-admin" <perlbug-admin@perl.org>
237
238   Submitting patches
239       Always submit patches to perl5-porters@perl.org.  If you're patching a
240       core module and there's an author listed, send the author a copy (see
241       "Patching a core module").  This lets other porters review your patch,
242       which catches a surprising number of errors in patches.  Please patch
243       against the latest development version. (e.g., even if you're fixing a
244       bug in the 5.8 track, patch against the "blead" branch in the git
245       repository.)
246
247       If changes are accepted, they are applied to the development branch.
248       Then the maintenance pumpking decides which of those patches is to be
249       backported to the maint branch.  Only patches that survive the heat of
250       the development branch get applied to maintenance versions.
251
252       Your patch should update the documentation and test suite.  See
253       "Writing a test".  If you have added or removed files in the
254       distribution, edit the MANIFEST file accordingly, sort the MANIFEST
255       file using "make manisort", and include those changes as part of your
256       patch.
257
258       Patching documentation also follows the same order: if accepted, a
259       patch is first applied to development, and if relevant then it's
260       backported to maintenance. (With an exception for some patches that
261       document behaviour that only appears in the maintenance branch, but
262       which has changed in the development version.)
263
264       To report a bug in Perl, use the program perlbug which comes with Perl
265       (if you can't get Perl to work, send mail to the address
266       perlbug@perl.org or perlbug@perl.com).  Reporting bugs through perlbug
267       feeds into the automated bug-tracking system, access to which is
268       provided through the web at http://rt.perl.org/rt3/ .  It often pays to
269       check the archives of the perl5-porters mailing list to see whether the
270       bug you're reporting has been reported before, and if so whether it was
271       considered a bug.  See above for the location of the searchable
272       archives.
273
274       The CPAN testers ( http://testers.cpan.org/ ) are a group of volunteers
275       who test CPAN modules on a variety of platforms.  Perl Smokers (
276       http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.daily-build and
277       http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.daily-build.reports/ )
278       automatically test Perl source releases on platforms with various
279       configurations.  Both efforts welcome volunteers. In order to get
280       involved in smoke testing of the perl itself visit
281       http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Smoke
282       <http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Smoke>. In order to start smoke
283       testing CPAN modules visit
284       http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-YACSmoke/
285       <http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-YACSmoke/> or
286       <http://search.cpan.org/dist/minismokebox/> or
287       http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Reporter/
288       <http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Reporter/>.
289
290       It's a good idea to read and lurk for a while before chipping in.  That
291       way you'll get to see the dynamic of the conversations, learn the
292       personalities of the players, and hopefully be better prepared to make
293       a useful contribution when do you speak up.
294
295       If after all this you still think you want to join the perl5-porters
296       mailing list, send mail to perl5-porters-subscribe@perl.org.  To
297       unsubscribe, send mail to perl5-porters-unsubscribe@perl.org.
298
299       To hack on the Perl guts, you'll need to read the following things:
300
301       perlguts
302          This is of paramount importance, since it's the documentation of
303          what goes where in the Perl source. Read it over a couple of times
304          and it might start to make sense - don't worry if it doesn't yet,
305          because the best way to study it is to read it in conjunction with
306          poking at Perl source, and we'll do that later on.
307
308          Gisle Aas's "illustrated perlguts", also known as illguts, has very
309          helpful pictures:
310
311          <http://search.cpan.org/dist/illguts/>
312
313       perlxstut and perlxs
314          A working knowledge of XSUB programming is incredibly useful for
315          core hacking; XSUBs use techniques drawn from the PP code, the
316          portion of the guts that actually executes a Perl program. It's a
317          lot gentler to learn those techniques from simple examples and
318          explanation than from the core itself.
319
320       perlapi
321          The documentation for the Perl API explains what some of the
322          internal functions do, as well as the many macros used in the
323          source.
324
325       Porting/pumpkin.pod
326          This is a collection of words of wisdom for a Perl porter; some of
327          it is only useful to the pumpkin holder, but most of it applies to
328          anyone wanting to go about Perl development.
329
330       The perl5-porters FAQ
331          This should be available from
332          http://dev.perl.org/perl5/docs/p5p-faq.html .  It contains hints on
333          reading perl5-porters, information on how perl5-porters works and
334          how Perl development in general works.
335
336   Finding Your Way Around
337       Perl maintenance can be split into a number of areas, and certain
338       people (pumpkins) will have responsibility for each area. These areas
339       sometimes correspond to files or directories in the source kit. Among
340       the areas are:
341
342       Core modules
343          Modules shipped as part of the Perl core live in various
344          subdirectories, where two are dedicated to core-only modules, and
345          two are for the dual-life modules which live on CPAN and may be
346          maintained separately with respect to the Perl core:
347
348              lib/  is for pure-Perl modules, which exist in the core only.
349
350              ext/  is for XS extensions, and modules with special Makefile.PL
351                    requirements, which exist in the core only.
352
353              cpan/ is for dual-life modules, where the CPAN module is
354                    canonical (should be patched first).
355
356              dist/ is for dual-life modules, where the blead source is
357                    canonical.
358
359          For some dual-life modules it has not been discussed if the CPAN
360          version or the blead source is canonical. Until that is done, those
361          modules should be in cpan/.
362
363       Tests
364          There are tests for nearly all the modules, built-ins and major bits
365          of functionality.  Test files all have a .t suffix.  Module tests
366          live in the lib/ and ext/ directories next to the module being
367          tested.  Others live in t/.  See "Writing a test"
368
369       Documentation
370          Documentation maintenance includes looking after everything in the
371          pod/ directory, (as well as contributing new documentation) and the
372          documentation to the modules in core.
373
374       Configure
375          The Configure process is the way we make Perl portable across the
376          myriad of operating systems it supports. Responsibility for the
377          Configure, build and installation process, as well as the overall
378          portability of the core code rests with the Configure pumpkin -
379          others help out with individual operating systems.
380
381          The three files that fall under his/her responsibility are
382          Configure, config_h.SH, and Porting/Glossary (and a whole bunch of
383          small related files that are less important here). The Configure
384          pumpkin decides how patches to these are dealt with. Currently, the
385          Configure pumpkin will accept patches in most common formats, even
386          directly to these files.  Other committers are allowed to commit to
387          these files under the strict condition that they will inform the
388          Configure pumpkin, either on IRC (if he/she happens to be around) or
389          through (personal) e-mail.
390
391          The files involved are the operating system directories, (win32/,
392          os2/, vms/ and so on) the shell scripts which generate config.h and
393          Makefile, as well as the metaconfig files which generate Configure.
394          (metaconfig isn't included in the core distribution.)
395
396          See http://perl5.git.perl.org/metaconfig.git/blob/HEAD:/README for a
397          description of the full process involved.
398
399       Interpreter
400          And of course, there's the core of the Perl interpreter itself.
401          Let's have a look at that in a little more detail.
402
403       Before we leave looking at the layout, though, don't forget that
404       MANIFEST contains not only the file names in the Perl distribution, but
405       short descriptions of what's in them, too. For an overview of the
406       important files, try this:
407
408           perl -lne 'print if /^[^\/]+\.[ch]\s+/' MANIFEST
409
410   Elements of the interpreter
411       The work of the interpreter has two main stages: compiling the code
412       into the internal representation, or bytecode, and then executing it.
413       "Compiled code" in perlguts explains exactly how the compilation stage
414       happens.
415
416       Here is a short breakdown of perl's operation:
417
418       Startup
419          The action begins in perlmain.c. (or miniperlmain.c for miniperl)
420          This is very high-level code, enough to fit on a single screen, and
421          it resembles the code found in perlembed; most of the real action
422          takes place in perl.c
423
424          perlmain.c is generated by writemain from miniperlmain.c at make
425          time, so you should make perl to follow this along.
426
427          First, perlmain.c allocates some memory and constructs a Perl
428          interpreter, along these lines:
429
430              1 PERL_SYS_INIT3(&argc,&argv,&env);
431              2
432              3 if (!PL_do_undump) {
433              4     my_perl = perl_alloc();
434              5     if (!my_perl)
435              6         exit(1);
436              7     perl_construct(my_perl);
437              8     PL_perl_destruct_level = 0;
438              9 }
439
440          Line 1 is a macro, and its definition is dependent on your operating
441          system. Line 3 references "PL_do_undump", a global variable - all
442          global variables in Perl start with "PL_". This tells you whether
443          the current running program was created with the "-u" flag to perl
444          and then undump, which means it's going to be false in any sane
445          context.
446
447          Line 4 calls a function in perl.c to allocate memory for a Perl
448          interpreter. It's quite a simple function, and the guts of it looks
449          like this:
450
451           my_perl = (PerlInterpreter*)PerlMem_malloc(sizeof(PerlInterpreter));
452
453          Here you see an example of Perl's system abstraction, which we'll
454          see later: "PerlMem_malloc" is either your system's "malloc", or
455          Perl's own "malloc" as defined in malloc.c if you selected that
456          option at configure time.
457
458          Next, in line 7, we construct the interpreter using perl_construct,
459          also in perl.c; this sets up all the special variables that Perl
460          needs, the stacks, and so on.
461
462          Now we pass Perl the command line options, and tell it to go:
463
464           exitstatus = perl_parse(my_perl, xs_init, argc, argv, (char **)NULL);
465           if (!exitstatus)
466               perl_run(my_perl);
467
468           exitstatus = perl_destruct(my_perl);
469
470           perl_free(my_perl);
471
472          "perl_parse" is actually a wrapper around "S_parse_body", as defined
473          in perl.c, which processes the command line options, sets up any
474          statically linked XS modules, opens the program and calls "yyparse"
475          to parse it.
476
477       Parsing
478          The aim of this stage is to take the Perl source, and turn it into
479          an op tree. We'll see what one of those looks like later. Strictly
480          speaking, there's three things going on here.
481
482          "yyparse", the parser, lives in perly.c, although you're better off
483          reading the original YACC input in perly.y. (Yes, Virginia, there is
484          a YACC grammar for Perl!) The job of the parser is to take your code
485          and "understand" it, splitting it into sentences, deciding which
486          operands go with which operators and so on.
487
488          The parser is nobly assisted by the lexer, which chunks up your
489          input into tokens, and decides what type of thing each token is: a
490          variable name, an operator, a bareword, a subroutine, a core
491          function, and so on.  The main point of entry to the lexer is
492          "yylex", and that and its associated routines can be found in
493          toke.c. Perl isn't much like other computer languages; it's highly
494          context sensitive at times, it can be tricky to work out what sort
495          of token something is, or where a token ends. As such, there's a lot
496          of interplay between the tokeniser and the parser, which can get
497          pretty frightening if you're not used to it.
498
499          As the parser understands a Perl program, it builds up a tree of
500          operations for the interpreter to perform during execution. The
501          routines which construct and link together the various operations
502          are to be found in op.c, and will be examined later.
503
504       Optimization
505          Now the parsing stage is complete, and the finished tree represents
506          the operations that the Perl interpreter needs to perform to execute
507          our program. Next, Perl does a dry run over the tree looking for
508          optimisations: constant expressions such as "3 + 4" will be computed
509          now, and the optimizer will also see if any multiple operations can
510          be replaced with a single one. For instance, to fetch the variable
511          $foo, instead of grabbing the glob *foo and looking at the scalar
512          component, the optimizer fiddles the op tree to use a function which
513          directly looks up the scalar in question. The main optimizer is
514          "peep" in op.c, and many ops have their own optimizing functions.
515
516       Running
517          Now we're finally ready to go: we have compiled Perl byte code, and
518          all that's left to do is run it. The actual execution is done by the
519          "runops_standard" function in run.c; more specifically, it's done by
520          these three innocent looking lines:
521
522              while ((PL_op = CALL_FPTR(PL_op->op_ppaddr)(aTHX))) {
523                  PERL_ASYNC_CHECK();
524              }
525
526          You may be more comfortable with the Perl version of that:
527
528              PERL_ASYNC_CHECK() while $Perl::op = &{$Perl::op->{function}};
529
530          Well, maybe not. Anyway, each op contains a function pointer, which
531          stipulates the function which will actually carry out the operation.
532          This function will return the next op in the sequence - this allows
533          for things like "if" which choose the next op dynamically at run
534          time.  The "PERL_ASYNC_CHECK" makes sure that things like signals
535          interrupt execution if required.
536
537          The actual functions called are known as PP code, and they're spread
538          between four files: pp_hot.c contains the "hot" code, which is most
539          often used and highly optimized, pp_sys.c contains all the system-
540          specific functions, pp_ctl.c contains the functions which implement
541          control structures ("if", "while" and the like) and pp.c contains
542          everything else. These are, if you like, the C code for Perl's
543          built-in functions and operators.
544
545          Note that each "pp_" function is expected to return a pointer to the
546          next op. Calls to perl subs (and eval blocks) are handled within the
547          same runops loop, and do not consume extra space on the C stack. For
548          example, "pp_entersub" and "pp_entertry" just push a "CxSUB" or
549          "CxEVAL" block struct onto the context stack which contain the
550          address of the op following the sub call or eval. They then return
551          the first op of that sub or eval block, and so execution continues
552          of that sub or block.  Later, a "pp_leavesub" or "pp_leavetry" op
553          pops the "CxSUB" or "CxEVAL", retrieves the return op from it, and
554          returns it.
555
556       Exception handing
557          Perl's exception handing (i.e. "die" etc.) is built on top of the
558          low-level "setjmp()"/"longjmp()" C-library functions. These
559          basically provide a way to capture the current PC and SP registers
560          and later restore them; i.e.  a "longjmp()" continues at the point
561          in code where a previous "setjmp()" was done, with anything further
562          up on the C stack being lost. This is why code should always save
563          values using "SAVE_FOO" rather than in auto variables.
564
565          The perl core wraps "setjmp()" etc in the macros "JMPENV_PUSH" and
566          "JMPENV_JUMP". The basic rule of perl exceptions is that "exit", and
567          "die" (in the absence of "eval") perform a JMPENV_JUMP(2), while
568          "die" within "eval" does a JMPENV_JUMP(3).
569
570          At entry points to perl, such as "perl_parse()", "perl_run()" and
571          "call_sv(cv, G_EVAL)" each does a "JMPENV_PUSH", then enter a runops
572          loop or whatever, and handle possible exception returns. For a 2
573          return, final cleanup is performed, such as popping stacks and
574          calling "CHECK" or "END" blocks. Amongst other things, this is how
575          scope cleanup still occurs during an "exit".
576
577          If a "die" can find a "CxEVAL" block on the context stack, then the
578          stack is popped to that level and the return op in that block is
579          assigned to "PL_restartop"; then a JMPENV_JUMP(3) is performed.
580          This normally passes control back to the guard. In the case of
581          "perl_run" and "call_sv", a non-null "PL_restartop" triggers re-
582          entry to the runops loop. The is the normal way that "die" or
583          "croak" is handled within an "eval".
584
585          Sometimes ops are executed within an inner runops loop, such as tie,
586          sort or overload code. In this case, something like
587
588              sub FETCH { eval { die } }
589
590          would cause a longjmp right back to the guard in "perl_run", popping
591          both runops loops, which is clearly incorrect. One way to avoid this
592          is for the tie code to do a "JMPENV_PUSH" before executing "FETCH"
593          in the inner runops loop, but for efficiency reasons, perl in fact
594          just sets a flag, using "CATCH_SET(TRUE)". The "pp_require",
595          "pp_entereval" and "pp_entertry" ops check this flag, and if true,
596          they call "docatch", which does a "JMPENV_PUSH" and starts a new
597          runops level to execute the code, rather than doing it on the
598          current loop.
599
600          As a further optimisation, on exit from the eval block in the
601          "FETCH", execution of the code following the block is still carried
602          on in the inner loop.  When an exception is raised, "docatch"
603          compares the "JMPENV" level of the "CxEVAL" with "PL_top_env" and if
604          they differ, just re-throws the exception. In this way any inner
605          loops get popped.
606
607          Here's an example.
608
609              1: eval { tie @a, 'A' };
610              2: sub A::TIEARRAY {
611              3:     eval { die };
612              4:     die;
613              5: }
614
615          To run this code, "perl_run" is called, which does a "JMPENV_PUSH"
616          then enters a runops loop. This loop executes the eval and tie ops
617          on line 1, with the eval pushing a "CxEVAL" onto the context stack.
618
619          The "pp_tie" does a "CATCH_SET(TRUE)", then starts a second runops
620          loop to execute the body of "TIEARRAY". When it executes the
621          entertry op on line 3, "CATCH_GET" is true, so "pp_entertry" calls
622          "docatch" which does a "JMPENV_PUSH" and starts a third runops loop,
623          which then executes the die op. At this point the C call stack looks
624          like this:
625
626              Perl_pp_die
627              Perl_runops      # third loop
628              S_docatch_body
629              S_docatch
630              Perl_pp_entertry
631              Perl_runops      # second loop
632              S_call_body
633              Perl_call_sv
634              Perl_pp_tie
635              Perl_runops      # first loop
636              S_run_body
637              perl_run
638              main
639
640          and the context and data stacks, as shown by "-Dstv", look like:
641
642              STACK 0: MAIN
643                CX 0: BLOCK  =>
644                CX 1: EVAL   => AV()  PV("A"\0)
645                retop=leave
646              STACK 1: MAGIC
647                CX 0: SUB    =>
648                retop=(null)
649                CX 1: EVAL   => *
650              retop=nextstate
651
652          The die pops the first "CxEVAL" off the context stack, sets
653          "PL_restartop" from it, does a JMPENV_JUMP(3), and control returns
654          to the top "docatch". This then starts another third-level runops
655          level, which executes the nextstate, pushmark and die ops on line 4.
656          At the point that the second "pp_die" is called, the C call stack
657          looks exactly like that above, even though we are no longer within
658          an inner eval; this is because of the optimization mentioned
659          earlier. However, the context stack now looks like this, ie with the
660          top CxEVAL popped:
661
662              STACK 0: MAIN
663                CX 0: BLOCK  =>
664                CX 1: EVAL   => AV()  PV("A"\0)
665                retop=leave
666              STACK 1: MAGIC
667                CX 0: SUB    =>
668                retop=(null)
669
670          The die on line 4 pops the context stack back down to the CxEVAL,
671          leaving it as:
672
673              STACK 0: MAIN
674                CX 0: BLOCK  =>
675
676          As usual, "PL_restartop" is extracted from the "CxEVAL", and a
677          JMPENV_JUMP(3) done, which pops the C stack back to the docatch:
678
679              S_docatch
680              Perl_pp_entertry
681              Perl_runops      # second loop
682              S_call_body
683              Perl_call_sv
684              Perl_pp_tie
685              Perl_runops      # first loop
686              S_run_body
687              perl_run
688              main
689
690          In  this case, because the "JMPENV" level recorded in the "CxEVAL"
691          differs from the current one, "docatch" just does a JMPENV_JUMP(3)
692          and the C stack unwinds to:
693
694              perl_run
695              main
696
697          Because "PL_restartop" is non-null, "run_body" starts a new runops
698          loop and execution continues.
699
700   Internal Variable Types
701       You should by now have had a look at perlguts, which tells you about
702       Perl's internal variable types: SVs, HVs, AVs and the rest. If not, do
703       that now.
704
705       These variables are used not only to represent Perl-space variables,
706       but also any constants in the code, as well as some structures
707       completely internal to Perl. The symbol table, for instance, is an
708       ordinary Perl hash. Your code is represented by an SV as it's read into
709       the parser; any program files you call are opened via ordinary Perl
710       filehandles, and so on.
711
712       The core Devel::Peek module lets us examine SVs from a Perl program.
713       Let's see, for instance, how Perl treats the constant "hello".
714
715             % perl -MDevel::Peek -e 'Dump("hello")'
716           1 SV = PV(0xa041450) at 0xa04ecbc
717           2   REFCNT = 1
718           3   FLAGS = (POK,READONLY,pPOK)
719           4   PV = 0xa0484e0 "hello"\0
720           5   CUR = 5
721           6   LEN = 6
722
723       Reading "Devel::Peek" output takes a bit of practise, so let's go
724       through it line by line.
725
726       Line 1 tells us we're looking at an SV which lives at 0xa04ecbc in
727       memory. SVs themselves are very simple structures, but they contain a
728       pointer to a more complex structure. In this case, it's a PV, a
729       structure which holds a string value, at location 0xa041450.  Line 2 is
730       the reference count; there are no other references to this data, so
731       it's 1.
732
733       Line 3 are the flags for this SV - it's OK to use it as a PV, it's a
734       read-only SV (because it's a constant) and the data is a PV internally.
735       Next we've got the contents of the string, starting at location
736       0xa0484e0.
737
738       Line 5 gives us the current length of the string - note that this does
739       not include the null terminator. Line 6 is not the length of the
740       string, but the length of the currently allocated buffer; as the string
741       grows, Perl automatically extends the available storage via a routine
742       called "SvGROW".
743
744       You can get at any of these quantities from C very easily; just add
745       "Sv" to the name of the field shown in the snippet, and you've got a
746       macro which will return the value: "SvCUR(sv)" returns the current
747       length of the string, "SvREFCOUNT(sv)" returns the reference count,
748       "SvPV(sv, len)" returns the string itself with its length, and so on.
749       More macros to manipulate these properties can be found in perlguts.
750
751       Let's take an example of manipulating a PV, from "sv_catpvn", in sv.c
752
753            1  void
754            2  Perl_sv_catpvn(pTHX_ register SV *sv, register const char *ptr, register STRLEN len)
755            3  {
756            4      STRLEN tlen;
757            5      char *junk;
758
759            6      junk = SvPV_force(sv, tlen);
760            7      SvGROW(sv, tlen + len + 1);
761            8      if (ptr == junk)
762            9          ptr = SvPVX(sv);
763           10      Move(ptr,SvPVX(sv)+tlen,len,char);
764           11      SvCUR(sv) += len;
765           12      *SvEND(sv) = '\0';
766           13      (void)SvPOK_only_UTF8(sv);          /* validate pointer */
767           14      SvTAINT(sv);
768           15  }
769
770       This is a function which adds a string, "ptr", of length "len" onto the
771       end of the PV stored in "sv". The first thing we do in line 6 is make
772       sure that the SV has a valid PV, by calling the "SvPV_force" macro to
773       force a PV. As a side effect, "tlen" gets set to the current value of
774       the PV, and the PV itself is returned to "junk".
775
776       In line 7, we make sure that the SV will have enough room to
777       accommodate the old string, the new string and the null terminator. If
778       "LEN" isn't big enough, "SvGROW" will reallocate space for us.
779
780       Now, if "junk" is the same as the string we're trying to add, we can
781       grab the string directly from the SV; "SvPVX" is the address of the PV
782       in the SV.
783
784       Line 10 does the actual catenation: the "Move" macro moves a chunk of
785       memory around: we move the string "ptr" to the end of the PV - that's
786       the start of the PV plus its current length. We're moving "len" bytes
787       of type "char". After doing so, we need to tell Perl we've extended the
788       string, by altering "CUR" to reflect the new length. "SvEND" is a macro
789       which gives us the end of the string, so that needs to be a "\0".
790
791       Line 13 manipulates the flags; since we've changed the PV, any IV or NV
792       values will no longer be valid: if we have "$a=10; $a.="6";" we don't
793       want to use the old IV of 10. "SvPOK_only_utf8" is a special
794       UTF-8-aware version of "SvPOK_only", a macro which turns off the IOK
795       and NOK flags and turns on POK. The final "SvTAINT" is a macro which
796       launders tainted data if taint mode is turned on.
797
798       AVs and HVs are more complicated, but SVs are by far the most common
799       variable type being thrown around. Having seen something of how we
800       manipulate these, let's go on and look at how the op tree is
801       constructed.
802
803   Op Trees
804       First, what is the op tree, anyway? The op tree is the parsed
805       representation of your program, as we saw in our section on parsing,
806       and it's the sequence of operations that Perl goes through to execute
807       your program, as we saw in "Running".
808
809       An op is a fundamental operation that Perl can perform: all the built-
810       in functions and operators are ops, and there are a series of ops which
811       deal with concepts the interpreter needs internally - entering and
812       leaving a block, ending a statement, fetching a variable, and so on.
813
814       The op tree is connected in two ways: you can imagine that there are
815       two "routes" through it, two orders in which you can traverse the tree.
816       First, parse order reflects how the parser understood the code, and
817       secondly, execution order tells perl what order to perform the
818       operations in.
819
820       The easiest way to examine the op tree is to stop Perl after it has
821       finished parsing, and get it to dump out the tree. This is exactly what
822       the compiler backends B::Terse, B::Concise and B::Debug do.
823
824       Let's have a look at how Perl sees "$a = $b + $c":
825
826            % perl -MO=Terse -e '$a=$b+$c'
827            1  LISTOP (0x8179888) leave
828            2      OP (0x81798b0) enter
829            3      COP (0x8179850) nextstate
830            4      BINOP (0x8179828) sassign
831            5          BINOP (0x8179800) add [1]
832            6              UNOP (0x81796e0) null [15]
833            7                  SVOP (0x80fafe0) gvsv  GV (0x80fa4cc) *b
834            8              UNOP (0x81797e0) null [15]
835            9                  SVOP (0x8179700) gvsv  GV (0x80efeb0) *c
836           10          UNOP (0x816b4f0) null [15]
837           11              SVOP (0x816dcf0) gvsv  GV (0x80fa460) *a
838
839       Let's start in the middle, at line 4. This is a BINOP, a binary
840       operator, which is at location 0x8179828. The specific operator in
841       question is "sassign" - scalar assignment - and you can find the code
842       which implements it in the function "pp_sassign" in pp_hot.c. As a
843       binary operator, it has two children: the add operator, providing the
844       result of "$b+$c", is uppermost on line 5, and the left hand side is on
845       line 10.
846
847       Line 10 is the null op: this does exactly nothing. What is that doing
848       there? If you see the null op, it's a sign that something has been
849       optimized away after parsing. As we mentioned in "Optimization", the
850       optimization stage sometimes converts two operations into one, for
851       example when fetching a scalar variable. When this happens, instead of
852       rewriting the op tree and cleaning up the dangling pointers, it's
853       easier just to replace the redundant operation with the null op.
854       Originally, the tree would have looked like this:
855
856           10          SVOP (0x816b4f0) rv2sv [15]
857           11              SVOP (0x816dcf0) gv  GV (0x80fa460) *a
858
859       That is, fetch the "a" entry from the main symbol table, and then look
860       at the scalar component of it: "gvsv" ("pp_gvsv" into pp_hot.c) happens
861       to do both these things.
862
863       The right hand side, starting at line 5 is similar to what we've just
864       seen: we have the "add" op ("pp_add" also in pp_hot.c) add together two
865       "gvsv"s.
866
867       Now, what's this about?
868
869            1  LISTOP (0x8179888) leave
870            2      OP (0x81798b0) enter
871            3      COP (0x8179850) nextstate
872
873       "enter" and "leave" are scoping ops, and their job is to perform any
874       housekeeping every time you enter and leave a block: lexical variables
875       are tidied up, unreferenced variables are destroyed, and so on. Every
876       program will have those first three lines: "leave" is a list, and its
877       children are all the statements in the block. Statements are delimited
878       by "nextstate", so a block is a collection of "nextstate" ops, with the
879       ops to be performed for each statement being the children of
880       "nextstate". "enter" is a single op which functions as a marker.
881
882       That's how Perl parsed the program, from top to bottom:
883
884                               Program
885                                  |
886                              Statement
887                                  |
888                                  =
889                                 / \
890                                /   \
891                               $a   +
892                                   / \
893                                 $b   $c
894
895       However, it's impossible to perform the operations in this order: you
896       have to find the values of $b and $c before you add them together, for
897       instance. So, the other thread that runs through the op tree is the
898       execution order: each op has a field "op_next" which points to the next
899       op to be run, so following these pointers tells us how perl executes
900       the code. We can traverse the tree in this order using the "exec"
901       option to "B::Terse":
902
903            % perl -MO=Terse,exec -e '$a=$b+$c'
904            1  OP (0x8179928) enter
905            2  COP (0x81798c8) nextstate
906            3  SVOP (0x81796c8) gvsv  GV (0x80fa4d4) *b
907            4  SVOP (0x8179798) gvsv  GV (0x80efeb0) *c
908            5  BINOP (0x8179878) add [1]
909            6  SVOP (0x816dd38) gvsv  GV (0x80fa468) *a
910            7  BINOP (0x81798a0) sassign
911            8  LISTOP (0x8179900) leave
912
913       This probably makes more sense for a human: enter a block, start a
914       statement. Get the values of $b and $c, and add them together.  Find
915       $a, and assign one to the other. Then leave.
916
917       The way Perl builds up these op trees in the parsing process can be
918       unravelled by examining perly.y, the YACC grammar. Let's take the piece
919       we need to construct the tree for "$a = $b + $c"
920
921           1 term    :   term ASSIGNOP term
922           2                { $$ = newASSIGNOP(OPf_STACKED, $1, $2, $3); }
923           3         |   term ADDOP term
924           4                { $$ = newBINOP($2, 0, scalar($1), scalar($3)); }
925
926       If you're not used to reading BNF grammars, this is how it works:
927       You're fed certain things by the tokeniser, which generally end up in
928       upper case. Here, "ADDOP", is provided when the tokeniser sees "+" in
929       your code. "ASSIGNOP" is provided when "=" is used for assigning. These
930       are "terminal symbols", because you can't get any simpler than them.
931
932       The grammar, lines one and three of the snippet above, tells you how to
933       build up more complex forms. These complex forms, "non-terminal
934       symbols" are generally placed in lower case. "term" here is a non-
935       terminal symbol, representing a single expression.
936
937       The grammar gives you the following rule: you can make the thing on the
938       left of the colon if you see all the things on the right in sequence.
939       This is called a "reduction", and the aim of parsing is to completely
940       reduce the input. There are several different ways you can perform a
941       reduction, separated by vertical bars: so, "term" followed by "="
942       followed by "term" makes a "term", and "term" followed by "+" followed
943       by "term" can also make a "term".
944
945       So, if you see two terms with an "=" or "+", between them, you can turn
946       them into a single expression. When you do this, you execute the code
947       in the block on the next line: if you see "=", you'll do the code in
948       line 2. If you see "+", you'll do the code in line 4. It's this code
949       which contributes to the op tree.
950
951                   |   term ADDOP term
952                   { $$ = newBINOP($2, 0, scalar($1), scalar($3)); }
953
954       What this does is creates a new binary op, and feeds it a number of
955       variables. The variables refer to the tokens: $1 is the first token in
956       the input, $2 the second, and so on - think regular expression
957       backreferences. $$ is the op returned from this reduction. So, we call
958       "newBINOP" to create a new binary operator. The first parameter to
959       "newBINOP", a function in op.c, is the op type. It's an addition
960       operator, so we want the type to be "ADDOP". We could specify this
961       directly, but it's right there as the second token in the input, so we
962       use $2. The second parameter is the op's flags: 0 means "nothing
963       special". Then the things to add: the left and right hand side of our
964       expression, in scalar context.
965
966   Stacks
967       When perl executes something like "addop", how does it pass on its
968       results to the next op? The answer is, through the use of stacks. Perl
969       has a number of stacks to store things it's currently working on, and
970       we'll look at the three most important ones here.
971
972       Argument stack
973          Arguments are passed to PP code and returned from PP code using the
974          argument stack, "ST". The typical way to handle arguments is to pop
975          them off the stack, deal with them how you wish, and then push the
976          result back onto the stack. This is how, for instance, the cosine
977          operator works:
978
979                NV value;
980                value = POPn;
981                value = Perl_cos(value);
982                XPUSHn(value);
983
984          We'll see a more tricky example of this when we consider Perl's
985          macros below. "POPn" gives you the NV (floating point value) of the
986          top SV on the stack: the $x in "cos($x)". Then we compute the
987          cosine, and push the result back as an NV. The "X" in "XPUSHn" means
988          that the stack should be extended if necessary - it can't be
989          necessary here, because we know there's room for one more item on
990          the stack, since we've just removed one! The "XPUSH*" macros at
991          least guarantee safety.
992
993          Alternatively, you can fiddle with the stack directly: "SP" gives
994          you the first element in your portion of the stack, and "TOP*" gives
995          you the top SV/IV/NV/etc. on the stack. So, for instance, to do
996          unary negation of an integer:
997
998               SETi(-TOPi);
999
1000          Just set the integer value of the top stack entry to its negation.
1001
1002          Argument stack manipulation in the core is exactly the same as it is
1003          in XSUBs - see perlxstut, perlxs and perlguts for a longer
1004          description of the macros used in stack manipulation.
1005
1006       Mark stack
1007          I say "your portion of the stack" above because PP code doesn't
1008          necessarily get the whole stack to itself: if your function calls
1009          another function, you'll only want to expose the arguments aimed for
1010          the called function, and not (necessarily) let it get at your own
1011          data. The way we do this is to have a "virtual" bottom-of-stack,
1012          exposed to each function. The mark stack keeps bookmarks to
1013          locations in the argument stack usable by each function. For
1014          instance, when dealing with a tied variable, (internally, something
1015          with "P" magic) Perl has to call methods for accesses to the tied
1016          variables. However, we need to separate the arguments exposed to the
1017          method to the argument exposed to the original function - the store
1018          or fetch or whatever it may be. Here's roughly how the tied "push"
1019          is implemented; see "av_push" in av.c:
1020
1021               1  PUSHMARK(SP);
1022               2  EXTEND(SP,2);
1023               3  PUSHs(SvTIED_obj((SV*)av, mg));
1024               4  PUSHs(val);
1025               5  PUTBACK;
1026               6  ENTER;
1027               7  call_method("PUSH", G_SCALAR|G_DISCARD);
1028               8  LEAVE;
1029
1030          Let's examine the whole implementation, for practice:
1031
1032               1  PUSHMARK(SP);
1033
1034          Push the current state of the stack pointer onto the mark stack.
1035          This is so that when we've finished adding items to the argument
1036          stack, Perl knows how many things we've added recently.
1037
1038               2  EXTEND(SP,2);
1039               3  PUSHs(SvTIED_obj((SV*)av, mg));
1040               4  PUSHs(val);
1041
1042          We're going to add two more items onto the argument stack: when you
1043          have a tied array, the "PUSH" subroutine receives the object and the
1044          value to be pushed, and that's exactly what we have here - the tied
1045          object, retrieved with "SvTIED_obj", and the value, the SV "val".
1046
1047               5  PUTBACK;
1048
1049          Next we tell Perl to update the global stack pointer from our
1050          internal variable: "dSP" only gave us a local copy, not a reference
1051          to the global.
1052
1053               6  ENTER;
1054               7  call_method("PUSH", G_SCALAR|G_DISCARD);
1055               8  LEAVE;
1056
1057          "ENTER" and "LEAVE" localise a block of code - they make sure that
1058          all variables are tidied up, everything that has been localised gets
1059          its previous value returned, and so on. Think of them as the "{" and
1060          "}" of a Perl block.
1061
1062          To actually do the magic method call, we have to call a subroutine
1063          in Perl space: "call_method" takes care of that, and it's described
1064          in perlcall. We call the "PUSH" method in scalar context, and we're
1065          going to discard its return value.  The call_method() function
1066          removes the top element of the mark stack, so there is nothing for
1067          the caller to clean up.
1068
1069       Save stack
1070          C doesn't have a concept of local scope, so perl provides one. We've
1071          seen that "ENTER" and "LEAVE" are used as scoping braces; the save
1072          stack implements the C equivalent of, for example:
1073
1074              {
1075                  local $foo = 42;
1076                  ...
1077              }
1078
1079          See "Localising Changes" in perlguts for how to use the save stack.
1080
1081   Millions of Macros
1082       One thing you'll notice about the Perl source is that it's full of
1083       macros. Some have called the pervasive use of macros the hardest thing
1084       to understand, others find it adds to clarity. Let's take an example,
1085       the code which implements the addition operator:
1086
1087          1  PP(pp_add)
1088          2  {
1089          3      dSP; dATARGET; tryAMAGICbin(add,opASSIGN);
1090          4      {
1091          5        dPOPTOPnnrl_ul;
1092          6        SETn( left + right );
1093          7        RETURN;
1094          8      }
1095          9  }
1096
1097       Every line here (apart from the braces, of course) contains a macro.
1098       The first line sets up the function declaration as Perl expects for PP
1099       code; line 3 sets up variable declarations for the argument stack and
1100       the target, the return value of the operation. Finally, it tries to see
1101       if the addition operation is overloaded; if so, the appropriate
1102       subroutine is called.
1103
1104       Line 5 is another variable declaration - all variable declarations
1105       start with "d" - which pops from the top of the argument stack two NVs
1106       (hence "nn") and puts them into the variables "right" and "left", hence
1107       the "rl". These are the two operands to the addition operator. Next, we
1108       call "SETn" to set the NV of the return value to the result of adding
1109       the two values. This done, we return - the "RETURN" macro makes sure
1110       that our return value is properly handled, and we pass the next
1111       operator to run back to the main run loop.
1112
1113       Most of these macros are explained in perlapi, and some of the more
1114       important ones are explained in perlxs as well. Pay special attention
1115       to "Background and PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT" in perlguts for information
1116       on the "[pad]THX_?" macros.
1117
1118   The .i Targets
1119       You can expand the macros in a foo.c file by saying
1120
1121           make foo.i
1122
1123       which will expand the macros using cpp.  Don't be scared by the
1124       results.
1125

SOURCE CODE STATIC ANALYSIS

1127       Various tools exist for analysing C source code statically, as opposed
1128       to dynamically, that is, without executing the code.  It is possible to
1129       detect resource leaks, undefined behaviour, type mismatches,
1130       portability problems, code paths that would cause illegal memory
1131       accesses, and other similar problems by just parsing the C code and
1132       looking at the resulting graph, what does it tell about the execution
1133       and data flows.  As a matter of fact, this is exactly how C compilers
1134       know to give warnings about dubious code.
1135
1136   lint, splint
1137       The good old C code quality inspector, "lint", is available in several
1138       platforms, but please be aware that there are several different
1139       implementations of it by different vendors, which means that the flags
1140       are not identical across different platforms.
1141
1142       There is a lint variant called "splint" (Secure Programming Lint)
1143       available from http://www.splint.org/ that should compile on any Unix-
1144       like platform.
1145
1146       There are "lint" and <splint> targets in Makefile, but you may have to
1147       diddle with the flags (see above).
1148
1149   Coverity
1150       Coverity (http://www.coverity.com/) is a product similar to lint and as
1151       a testbed for their product they periodically check several open source
1152       projects, and they give out accounts to open source developers to the
1153       defect databases.
1154
1155   cpd (cut-and-paste detector)
1156       The cpd tool detects cut-and-paste coding.  If one instance of the cut-
1157       and-pasted code changes, all the other spots should probably be
1158       changed, too.  Therefore such code should probably be turned into a
1159       subroutine or a macro.
1160
1161       cpd (http://pmd.sourceforge.net/cpd.html) is part of the pmd project
1162       (http://pmd.sourceforge.net/).  pmd was originally written for static
1163       analysis of Java code, but later the cpd part of it was extended to
1164       parse also C and C++.
1165
1166       Download the pmd-bin-X.Y.zip () from the SourceForge site, extract the
1167       pmd-X.Y.jar from it, and then run that on source code thusly:
1168
1169         java -cp pmd-X.Y.jar net.sourceforge.pmd.cpd.CPD --minimum-tokens 100 --files /some/where/src --language c > cpd.txt
1170
1171       You may run into memory limits, in which case you should use the -Xmx
1172       option:
1173
1174         java -Xmx512M ...
1175
1176   gcc warnings
1177       Though much can be written about the inconsistency and coverage
1178       problems of gcc warnings (like "-Wall" not meaning "all the warnings",
1179       or some common portability problems not being covered by "-Wall", or
1180       "-ansi" and "-pedantic" both being a poorly defined collection of
1181       warnings, and so forth), gcc is still a useful tool in keeping our
1182       coding nose clean.
1183
1184       The "-Wall" is by default on.
1185
1186       The "-ansi" (and its sidekick, "-pedantic") would be nice to be on
1187       always, but unfortunately they are not safe on all platforms, they can
1188       for example cause fatal conflicts with the system headers (Solaris
1189       being a prime example).  If Configure "-Dgccansipedantic" is used, the
1190       "cflags" frontend selects "-ansi -pedantic" for the platforms where
1191       they are known to be safe.
1192
1193       Starting from Perl 5.9.4 the following extra flags are added:
1194
1195       ·   "-Wendif-labels"
1196
1197       ·   "-Wextra"
1198
1199       ·   "-Wdeclaration-after-statement"
1200
1201       The following flags would be nice to have but they would first need
1202       their own Augean stablemaster:
1203
1204       ·   "-Wpointer-arith"
1205
1206       ·   "-Wshadow"
1207
1208       ·   "-Wstrict-prototypes"
1209
1210       The "-Wtraditional" is another example of the annoying tendency of gcc
1211       to bundle a lot of warnings under one switch (it would be impossible to
1212       deploy in practice because it would complain a lot) but it does contain
1213       some warnings that would be beneficial to have available on their own,
1214       such as the warning about string constants inside macros containing the
1215       macro arguments: this behaved differently pre-ANSI than it does in
1216       ANSI, and some C compilers are still in transition, AIX being an
1217       example.
1218
1219   Warnings of other C compilers
1220       Other C compilers (yes, there are other C compilers than gcc) often
1221       have their "strict ANSI" or "strict ANSI with some portability
1222       extensions" modes on, like for example the Sun Workshop has its "-Xa"
1223       mode on (though implicitly), or the DEC (these days, HP...) has its
1224       "-std1" mode on.
1225
1226   DEBUGGING
1227       You can compile a special debugging version of Perl, which allows you
1228       to use the "-D" option of Perl to tell more about what Perl is doing.
1229       But sometimes there is no alternative than to dive in with a debugger,
1230       either to see the stack trace of a core dump (very useful in a bug
1231       report), or trying to figure out what went wrong before the core dump
1232       happened, or how did we end up having wrong or unexpected results.
1233
1234   Poking at Perl
1235       To really poke around with Perl, you'll probably want to build Perl for
1236       debugging, like this:
1237
1238           ./Configure -d -D optimize=-g
1239           make
1240
1241       "-g" is a flag to the C compiler to have it produce debugging
1242       information which will allow us to step through a running program, and
1243       to see in which C function we are at (without the debugging information
1244       we might see only the numerical addresses of the functions, which is
1245       not very helpful).
1246
1247       Configure will also turn on the "DEBUGGING" compilation symbol which
1248       enables all the internal debugging code in Perl. There are a whole
1249       bunch of things you can debug with this: perlrun lists them all, and
1250       the best way to find out about them is to play about with them. The
1251       most useful options are probably
1252
1253           l  Context (loop) stack processing
1254           t  Trace execution
1255           o  Method and overloading resolution
1256           c  String/numeric conversions
1257
1258       Some of the functionality of the debugging code can be achieved using
1259       XS modules.
1260
1261           -Dr => use re 'debug'
1262           -Dx => use O 'Debug'
1263
1264   Using a source-level debugger
1265       If the debugging output of "-D" doesn't help you, it's time to step
1266       through perl's execution with a source-level debugger.
1267
1268       ·  We'll use "gdb" for our examples here; the principles will apply to
1269          any debugger (many vendors call their debugger "dbx"), but check the
1270          manual of the one you're using.
1271
1272       To fire up the debugger, type
1273
1274           gdb ./perl
1275
1276       Or if you have a core dump:
1277
1278           gdb ./perl core
1279
1280       You'll want to do that in your Perl source tree so the debugger can
1281       read the source code. You should see the copyright message, followed by
1282       the prompt.
1283
1284           (gdb)
1285
1286       "help" will get you into the documentation, but here are the most
1287       useful commands:
1288
1289       run [args]
1290          Run the program with the given arguments.
1291
1292       break function_name
1293       break source.c:xxx
1294          Tells the debugger that we'll want to pause execution when we reach
1295          either the named function (but see "Internal Functions" in
1296          perlguts!) or the given line in the named source file.
1297
1298       step
1299          Steps through the program a line at a time.
1300
1301       next
1302          Steps through the program a line at a time, without descending into
1303          functions.
1304
1305       continue
1306          Run until the next breakpoint.
1307
1308       finish
1309          Run until the end of the current function, then stop again.
1310
1311       'enter'
1312          Just pressing Enter will do the most recent operation again - it's a
1313          blessing when stepping through miles of source code.
1314
1315       print
1316          Execute the given C code and print its results. WARNING: Perl makes
1317          heavy use of macros, and gdb does not necessarily support macros
1318          (see later "gdb macro support").  You'll have to substitute them
1319          yourself, or to invoke cpp on the source code files (see "The .i
1320          Targets") So, for instance, you can't say
1321
1322              print SvPV_nolen(sv)
1323
1324          but you have to say
1325
1326              print Perl_sv_2pv_nolen(sv)
1327
1328       You may find it helpful to have a "macro dictionary", which you can
1329       produce by saying "cpp -dM perl.c | sort". Even then, cpp won't
1330       recursively apply those macros for you.
1331
1332   gdb macro support
1333       Recent versions of gdb have fairly good macro support, but in order to
1334       use it you'll need to compile perl with macro definitions included in
1335       the debugging information.  Using gcc version 3.1, this means
1336       configuring with "-Doptimize=-g3".  Other compilers might use a
1337       different switch (if they support debugging macros at all).
1338
1339   Dumping Perl Data Structures
1340       One way to get around this macro hell is to use the dumping functions
1341       in dump.c; these work a little like an internal Devel::Peek, but they
1342       also cover OPs and other structures that you can't get at from Perl.
1343       Let's take an example. We'll use the "$a = $b + $c" we used before, but
1344       give it a bit of context: "$b = "6XXXX"; $c = 2.3;". Where's a good
1345       place to stop and poke around?
1346
1347       What about "pp_add", the function we examined earlier to implement the
1348       "+" operator:
1349
1350           (gdb) break Perl_pp_add
1351           Breakpoint 1 at 0x46249f: file pp_hot.c, line 309.
1352
1353       Notice we use "Perl_pp_add" and not "pp_add" - see "Internal Functions"
1354       in perlguts.  With the breakpoint in place, we can run our program:
1355
1356           (gdb) run -e '$b = "6XXXX"; $c = 2.3; $a = $b + $c'
1357
1358       Lots of junk will go past as gdb reads in the relevant source files and
1359       libraries, and then:
1360
1361           Breakpoint 1, Perl_pp_add () at pp_hot.c:309
1362           309         dSP; dATARGET; tryAMAGICbin(add,opASSIGN);
1363           (gdb) step
1364           311           dPOPTOPnnrl_ul;
1365           (gdb)
1366
1367       We looked at this bit of code before, and we said that "dPOPTOPnnrl_ul"
1368       arranges for two "NV"s to be placed into "left" and "right" - let's
1369       slightly expand it:
1370
1371        #define dPOPTOPnnrl_ul  NV right = POPn; \
1372                                SV *leftsv = TOPs; \
1373                                NV left = USE_LEFT(leftsv) ? SvNV(leftsv) : 0.0
1374
1375       "POPn" takes the SV from the top of the stack and obtains its NV either
1376       directly (if "SvNOK" is set) or by calling the "sv_2nv" function.
1377       "TOPs" takes the next SV from the top of the stack - yes, "POPn" uses
1378       "TOPs" - but doesn't remove it. We then use "SvNV" to get the NV from
1379       "leftsv" in the same way as before - yes, "POPn" uses "SvNV".
1380
1381       Since we don't have an NV for $b, we'll have to use "sv_2nv" to convert
1382       it. If we step again, we'll find ourselves there:
1383
1384           Perl_sv_2nv (sv=0xa0675d0) at sv.c:1669
1385           1669        if (!sv)
1386           (gdb)
1387
1388       We can now use "Perl_sv_dump" to investigate the SV:
1389
1390           SV = PV(0xa057cc0) at 0xa0675d0
1391           REFCNT = 1
1392           FLAGS = (POK,pPOK)
1393           PV = 0xa06a510 "6XXXX"\0
1394           CUR = 5
1395           LEN = 6
1396           $1 = void
1397
1398       We know we're going to get 6 from this, so let's finish the subroutine:
1399
1400           (gdb) finish
1401           Run till exit from #0  Perl_sv_2nv (sv=0xa0675d0) at sv.c:1671
1402           0x462669 in Perl_pp_add () at pp_hot.c:311
1403           311           dPOPTOPnnrl_ul;
1404
1405       We can also dump out this op: the current op is always stored in
1406       "PL_op", and we can dump it with "Perl_op_dump". This'll give us
1407       similar output to B::Debug.
1408
1409           {
1410           13  TYPE = add  ===> 14
1411               TARG = 1
1412               FLAGS = (SCALAR,KIDS)
1413               {
1414                   TYPE = null  ===> (12)
1415                     (was rv2sv)
1416                   FLAGS = (SCALAR,KIDS)
1417                   {
1418           11          TYPE = gvsv  ===> 12
1419                       FLAGS = (SCALAR)
1420                       GV = main::b
1421                   }
1422               }
1423
1424       # finish this later #
1425
1426   Patching
1427       All right, we've now had a look at how to navigate the Perl sources and
1428       some things you'll need to know when fiddling with them. Let's now get
1429       on and create a simple patch. Here's something Larry suggested: if a
1430       "U" is the first active format during a "pack", (for example, "pack
1431       "U3C8", @stuff") then the resulting string should be treated as UTF-8
1432       encoded.
1433
1434       If you are working with a git clone of the Perl repository, you will
1435       want to create a branch for your changes. This will make creating a
1436       proper patch much simpler. See the perlrepository for details on how to
1437       do this.
1438
1439       How do we prepare to fix this up? First we locate the code in question
1440       - the "pack" happens at runtime, so it's going to be in one of the pp
1441       files. Sure enough, "pp_pack" is in pp.c. Since we're going to be
1442       altering this file, let's copy it to pp.c~.
1443
1444       [Well, it was in pp.c when this tutorial was written. It has now been
1445       split off with "pp_unpack" to its own file, pp_pack.c]
1446
1447       Now let's look over "pp_pack": we take a pattern into "pat", and then
1448       loop over the pattern, taking each format character in turn into
1449       "datum_type". Then for each possible format character, we swallow up
1450       the other arguments in the pattern (a field width, an asterisk, and so
1451       on) and convert the next chunk input into the specified format, adding
1452       it onto the output SV "cat".
1453
1454       How do we know if the "U" is the first format in the "pat"? Well, if we
1455       have a pointer to the start of "pat" then, if we see a "U" we can test
1456       whether we're still at the start of the string. So, here's where "pat"
1457       is set up:
1458
1459           STRLEN fromlen;
1460           register char *pat = SvPVx(*++MARK, fromlen);
1461           register char *patend = pat + fromlen;
1462           register I32 len;
1463           I32 datumtype;
1464           SV *fromstr;
1465
1466       We'll have another string pointer in there:
1467
1468           STRLEN fromlen;
1469           register char *pat = SvPVx(*++MARK, fromlen);
1470           register char *patend = pat + fromlen;
1471        +  char *patcopy;
1472           register I32 len;
1473           I32 datumtype;
1474           SV *fromstr;
1475
1476       And just before we start the loop, we'll set "patcopy" to be the start
1477       of "pat":
1478
1479           items = SP - MARK;
1480           MARK++;
1481           sv_setpvn(cat, "", 0);
1482        +  patcopy = pat;
1483           while (pat < patend) {
1484
1485       Now if we see a "U" which was at the start of the string, we turn on
1486       the "UTF8" flag for the output SV, "cat":
1487
1488        +  if (datumtype == 'U' && pat==patcopy+1)
1489        +      SvUTF8_on(cat);
1490           if (datumtype == '#') {
1491               while (pat < patend && *pat != '\n')
1492                   pat++;
1493
1494       Remember that it has to be "patcopy+1" because the first character of
1495       the string is the "U" which has been swallowed into "datumtype!"
1496
1497       Oops, we forgot one thing: what if there are spaces at the start of the
1498       pattern? "pack("  U*", @stuff)" will have "U" as the first active
1499       character, even though it's not the first thing in the pattern. In this
1500       case, we have to advance "patcopy" along with "pat" when we see spaces:
1501
1502           if (isSPACE(datumtype))
1503               continue;
1504
1505       needs to become
1506
1507           if (isSPACE(datumtype)) {
1508               patcopy++;
1509               continue;
1510           }
1511
1512       OK. That's the C part done. Now we must do two additional things before
1513       this patch is ready to go: we've changed the behaviour of Perl, and so
1514       we must document that change. We must also provide some more regression
1515       tests to make sure our patch works and doesn't create a bug somewhere
1516       else along the line.
1517
1518       The regression tests for each operator live in t/op/, and so we make a
1519       copy of t/op/pack.t to t/op/pack.t~. Now we can add our tests to the
1520       end. First, we'll test that the "U" does indeed create Unicode strings.
1521
1522       t/op/pack.t has a sensible ok() function, but if it didn't we could use
1523       the one from t/test.pl.
1524
1525        require './test.pl';
1526        plan( tests => 159 );
1527
1528       so instead of this:
1529
1530        print 'not ' unless "1.20.300.4000" eq sprintf "%vd",
1531                                                      pack("U*",1,20,300,4000);
1532        print "ok $test\n"; $test++;
1533
1534       we can write the more sensible (see Test::More for a full explanation
1535       of is() and other testing functions).
1536
1537        is( "1.20.300.4000", sprintf "%vd", pack("U*",1,20,300,4000),
1538                                              "U* produces Unicode" );
1539
1540       Now we'll test that we got that space-at-the-beginning business right:
1541
1542        is( "1.20.300.4000", sprintf "%vd", pack("  U*",1,20,300,4000),
1543                                            "  with spaces at the beginning" );
1544
1545       And finally we'll test that we don't make Unicode strings if "U" is not
1546       the first active format:
1547
1548        isnt( v1.20.300.4000, sprintf "%vd", pack("C0U*",1,20,300,4000),
1549                                              "U* not first isn't Unicode" );
1550
1551       Mustn't forget to change the number of tests which appears at the top,
1552       or else the automated tester will get confused.  This will either look
1553       like this:
1554
1555        print "1..156\n";
1556
1557       or this:
1558
1559        plan( tests => 156 );
1560
1561       We now compile up Perl, and run it through the test suite. Our new
1562       tests pass, hooray!
1563
1564       Finally, the documentation. The job is never done until the paperwork
1565       is over, so let's describe the change we've just made. The relevant
1566       place is pod/perlfunc.pod; again, we make a copy, and then we'll insert
1567       this text in the description of "pack":
1568
1569        =item *
1570
1571        If the pattern begins with a C<U>, the resulting string will be treated
1572        as UTF-8-encoded Unicode. You can force UTF-8 encoding on in a string
1573        with an initial C<U0>, and the bytes that follow will be interpreted as
1574        Unicode characters. If you don't want this to happen, you can begin
1575        your pattern with C<C0> (or anything else) to force Perl not to UTF-8
1576        encode your string, and then follow this with a C<U*> somewhere in your
1577        pattern.
1578
1579   Patching a core module
1580       This works just like patching anything else, with an extra
1581       consideration.  Many core modules also live on CPAN.  If this is so,
1582       patch the CPAN version instead of the core and send the patch off to
1583       the module maintainer (with a copy to p5p).  This will help the module
1584       maintainer keep the CPAN version in sync with the core version without
1585       constantly scanning p5p.
1586
1587       The list of maintainers of core modules is usefully documented in
1588       Porting/Maintainers.pl.
1589
1590   Adding a new function to the core
1591       If, as part of a patch to fix a bug, or just because you have an
1592       especially good idea, you decide to add a new function to the core,
1593       discuss your ideas on p5p well before you start work.  It may be that
1594       someone else has already attempted to do what you are considering and
1595       can give lots of good advice or even provide you with bits of code that
1596       they already started (but never finished).
1597
1598       You have to follow all of the advice given above for patching.  It is
1599       extremely important to test any addition thoroughly and add new tests
1600       to explore all boundary conditions that your new function is expected
1601       to handle.  If your new function is used only by one module (e.g.
1602       toke), then it should probably be named S_your_function (for static);
1603       on the other hand, if you expect it to accessible from other functions
1604       in Perl, you should name it Perl_your_function.  See "Internal
1605       Functions" in perlguts for more details.
1606
1607       The location of any new code is also an important consideration.  Don't
1608       just create a new top level .c file and put your code there; you would
1609       have to make changes to Configure (so the Makefile is created
1610       properly), as well as possibly lots of include files.  This is strictly
1611       pumpking business.
1612
1613       It is better to add your function to one of the existing top level
1614       source code files, but your choice is complicated by the nature of the
1615       Perl distribution.  Only the files that are marked as compiled static
1616       are located in the perl executable.  Everything else is located in the
1617       shared library (or DLL if you are running under WIN32).  So, for
1618       example, if a function was only used by functions located in toke.c,
1619       then your code can go in toke.c.  If, however, you want to call the
1620       function from universal.c, then you should put your code in another
1621       location, for example util.c.
1622
1623       In addition to writing your c-code, you will need to create an
1624       appropriate entry in embed.pl describing your function, then run 'make
1625       regen_headers' to create the entries in the numerous header files that
1626       perl needs to compile correctly.  See "Internal Functions" in perlguts
1627       for information on the various options that you can set in embed.pl.
1628       You will forget to do this a few (or many) times and you will get
1629       warnings during the compilation phase.  Make sure that you mention this
1630       when you post your patch to P5P; the pumpking needs to know this.
1631
1632       When you write your new code, please be conscious of existing code
1633       conventions used in the perl source files.  See perlstyle for details.
1634       Although most of the guidelines discussed seem to focus on Perl code,
1635       rather than c, they all apply (except when they don't ;).  Also see
1636       perlrepository for lots of details about both formatting and submitting
1637       patches of your changes.
1638
1639       Lastly, TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST any code before posting to p5p.  Test
1640       on as many platforms as you can find.  Test as many perl Configure
1641       options as you can (e.g. MULTIPLICITY).  If you have profiling or
1642       memory tools, see "EXTERNAL TOOLS FOR DEBUGGING PERL" below for how to
1643       use them to further test your code.  Remember that most of the people
1644       on P5P are doing this on their own time and don't have the time to
1645       debug your code.
1646
1647   Writing a test
1648       Every module and built-in function has an associated test file (or
1649       should...).  If you add or change functionality, you have to write a
1650       test.  If you fix a bug, you have to write a test so that bug never
1651       comes back.  If you alter the docs, it would be nice to test what the
1652       new documentation says.
1653
1654       In short, if you submit a patch you probably also have to patch the
1655       tests.
1656
1657       For modules, the test file is right next to the module itself.
1658       lib/strict.t tests lib/strict.pm.  This is a recent innovation, so
1659       there are some snags (and it would be wonderful for you to brush them
1660       out), but it basically works that way.  Everything else lives in t/.
1661
1662       If you add a new test directory under t/, it is imperative that you add
1663       that directory to t/HARNESS and t/TEST.
1664
1665       t/base/
1666          Testing of the absolute basic functionality of Perl.  Things like
1667          "if", basic file reads and writes, simple regexes, etc.  These are
1668          run first in the test suite and if any of them fail, something is
1669          really broken.
1670
1671       t/cmd/
1672          These test the basic control structures, "if/else", "while",
1673          subroutines, etc.
1674
1675       t/comp/
1676          Tests basic issues of how Perl parses and compiles itself.
1677
1678       t/io/
1679          Tests for built-in IO functions, including command line arguments.
1680
1681       t/lib/
1682          The old home for the module tests, you shouldn't put anything new in
1683          here.  There are still some bits and pieces hanging around in here
1684          that need to be moved.  Perhaps you could move them?  Thanks!
1685
1686       t/mro/
1687          Tests for perl's method resolution order implementations (see mro).
1688
1689       t/op/
1690          Tests for perl's built in functions that don't fit into any of the
1691          other directories.
1692
1693       t/re/
1694          Tests for regex related functions or behaviour. (These used to live
1695          in t/op).
1696
1697       t/run/
1698          Testing features of how perl actually runs, including exit codes and
1699          handling of PERL* environment variables.
1700
1701       t/uni/
1702          Tests for the core support of Unicode.
1703
1704       t/win32/
1705          Windows-specific tests.
1706
1707       t/x2p
1708          A test suite for the s2p converter.
1709
1710       The core uses the same testing style as the rest of Perl, a simple
1711       "ok/not ok" run through Test::Harness, but there are a few special
1712       considerations.
1713
1714       There are three ways to write a test in the core.  Test::More,
1715       t/test.pl and ad hoc "print $test ? "ok 42\n" : "not ok 42\n"".  The
1716       decision of which to use depends on what part of the test suite you're
1717       working on.  This is a measure to prevent a high-level failure (such as
1718       Config.pm breaking) from causing basic functionality tests to fail.  If
1719       you write your own test, use the Test Anything Protocol.
1720
1721       t/base t/comp
1722           Since we don't know if require works, or even subroutines, use ad
1723           hoc tests for these two.  Step carefully to avoid using the feature
1724           being tested.
1725
1726       t/cmd t/run t/io t/op
1727           Now that basic require() and subroutines are tested, you can use
1728           the t/test.pl library which emulates the important features of
1729           Test::More while using a minimum of core features.
1730
1731           You can also conditionally use certain libraries like Config, but
1732           be sure to skip the test gracefully if it's not there.
1733
1734       t/lib ext lib
1735           Now that the core of Perl is tested, Test::More can be used.  You
1736           can also use the full suite of core modules in the tests.
1737
1738       When you say "make test" Perl uses the t/TEST program to run the test
1739       suite (except under Win32 where it uses t/harness instead.)  All tests
1740       are run from the t/ directory, not the directory which contains the
1741       test.  This causes some problems with the tests in lib/, so here's some
1742       opportunity for some patching.
1743
1744       You must be triply conscious of cross-platform concerns.  This usually
1745       boils down to using File::Spec and avoiding things like "fork()" and
1746       "system()" unless absolutely necessary.
1747
1748   Special Make Test Targets
1749       There are various special make targets that can be used to test Perl
1750       slightly differently than the standard "test" target.  Not all them are
1751       expected to give a 100% success rate.  Many of them have several
1752       aliases, and many of them are not available on certain operating
1753       systems.
1754
1755       coretest
1756           Run perl on all core tests (t/* and lib/[a-z]* pragma tests).
1757
1758           (Not available on Win32)
1759
1760       test.deparse
1761           Run all the tests through B::Deparse.  Not all tests will succeed.
1762
1763           (Not available on Win32)
1764
1765       test.taintwarn
1766           Run all tests with the -t command-line switch.  Not all tests are
1767           expected to succeed (until they're specifically fixed, of course).
1768
1769           (Not available on Win32)
1770
1771       minitest
1772           Run miniperl on t/base, t/comp, t/cmd, t/run, t/io, t/op, t/uni and
1773           t/mro tests.
1774
1775       test.valgrind check.valgrind utest.valgrind ucheck.valgrind
1776           (Only in Linux) Run all the tests using the memory leak + naughty
1777           memory access tool "valgrind".  The log files will be named
1778           testname.valgrind.
1779
1780       test.third check.third utest.third ucheck.third
1781           (Only in Tru64)  Run all the tests using the memory leak + naughty
1782           memory access tool "Third Degree".  The log files will be named
1783           perl.3log.testname.
1784
1785       test.torture torturetest
1786           Run all the usual tests and some extra tests.  As of Perl 5.8.0 the
1787           only extra tests are Abigail's JAPHs, t/japh/abigail.t.
1788
1789           You can also run the torture test with t/harness by giving
1790           "-torture" argument to t/harness.
1791
1792       utest ucheck test.utf8 check.utf8
1793           Run all the tests with -Mutf8.  Not all tests will succeed.
1794
1795           (Not available on Win32)
1796
1797       minitest.utf16 test.utf16
1798           Runs the tests with UTF-16 encoded scripts, encoded with different
1799           versions of this encoding.
1800
1801           "make utest.utf16" runs the test suite with a combination of
1802           "-utf8" and "-utf16" arguments to t/TEST.
1803
1804           (Not available on Win32)
1805
1806       test_harness
1807           Run the test suite with the t/harness controlling program, instead
1808           of t/TEST. t/harness is more sophisticated, and uses the
1809           Test::Harness module, thus using this test target supposes that
1810           perl mostly works. The main advantage for our purposes is that it
1811           prints a detailed summary of failed tests at the end. Also, unlike
1812           t/TEST, it doesn't redirect stderr to stdout.
1813
1814           Note that under Win32 t/harness is always used instead of t/TEST,
1815           so there is no special "test_harness" target.
1816
1817           Under Win32's "test" target you may use the TEST_SWITCHES and
1818           TEST_FILES environment variables to control the behaviour of
1819           t/harness.  This means you can say
1820
1821               nmake test TEST_FILES="op/*.t"
1822               nmake test TEST_SWITCHES="-torture" TEST_FILES="op/*.t"
1823
1824       Parallel tests
1825           The core distribution can now run its regression tests in parallel
1826           on Unix-like platforms. Instead of running "make test", set
1827           "TEST_JOBS" in your environment to the number of tests to run in
1828           parallel, and run "make test_harness". On a Bourne-like shell, this
1829           can be done as
1830
1831               TEST_JOBS=3 make test_harness  # Run 3 tests in parallel
1832
1833           An environment variable is used, rather than parallel make itself,
1834           because TAP::Harness needs to be able to schedule individual non-
1835           conflicting test scripts itself, and there is no standard interface
1836           to "make" utilities to interact with their job schedulers.
1837
1838           Note that currently some test scripts may fail when run in parallel
1839           (most notably "ext/IO/t/io_dir.t"). If necessary run just the
1840           failing scripts again sequentially and see if the failures go away.
1841           =item test-notty test_notty
1842
1843           Sets PERL_SKIP_TTY_TEST to true before running normal test.
1844
1845   Running tests by hand
1846       You can run part of the test suite by hand by using one the following
1847       commands from the t/ directory :
1848
1849           ./perl -I../lib TEST list-of-.t-files
1850
1851       or
1852
1853           ./perl -I../lib harness list-of-.t-files
1854
1855       (if you don't specify test scripts, the whole test suite will be run.)
1856
1857       Using t/harness for testing
1858
1859       If you use "harness" for testing you have several command line options
1860       available to you. The arguments are as follows, and are in the order
1861       that they must appear if used together.
1862
1863           harness -v -torture -re=pattern LIST OF FILES TO TEST
1864           harness -v -torture -re LIST OF PATTERNS TO MATCH
1865
1866       If "LIST OF FILES TO TEST" is omitted the file list is obtained from
1867       the manifest. The file list may include shell wildcards which will be
1868       expanded out.
1869
1870       -v  Run the tests under verbose mode so you can see what tests were
1871           run, and debug output.
1872
1873       -torture
1874           Run the torture tests as well as the normal set.
1875
1876       -re=PATTERN
1877           Filter the file list so that all the test files run match PATTERN.
1878           Note that this form is distinct from the -re LIST OF PATTERNS form
1879           below in that it allows the file list to be provided as well.
1880
1881       -re LIST OF PATTERNS
1882           Filter the file list so that all the test files run match
1883           /(LIST|OF|PATTERNS)/. Note that with this form the patterns are
1884           joined by '|' and you cannot supply a list of files, instead the
1885           test files are obtained from the MANIFEST.
1886
1887       You can run an individual test by a command similar to
1888
1889           ./perl -I../lib patho/to/foo.t
1890
1891       except that the harnesses set up some environment variables that may
1892       affect the execution of the test :
1893
1894       PERL_CORE=1
1895           indicates that we're running this test part of the perl core test
1896           suite.  This is useful for modules that have a dual life on CPAN.
1897
1898       PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL=2
1899           is set to 2 if it isn't set already (see "PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL")
1900
1901       PERL
1902           (used only by t/TEST) if set, overrides the path to the perl
1903           executable that should be used to run the tests (the default being
1904           ./perl).
1905
1906       PERL_SKIP_TTY_TEST
1907           if set, tells to skip the tests that need a terminal. It's actually
1908           set automatically by the Makefile, but can also be forced
1909           artificially by running 'make test_notty'.
1910
1911       Other environment variables that may influence tests
1912
1913       PERL_TEST_Net_Ping
1914           Setting this variable runs all the Net::Ping modules tests,
1915           otherwise some tests that interact with the outside world are
1916           skipped.  See perl58delta.
1917
1918       PERL_TEST_NOVREXX
1919           Setting this variable skips the vrexx.t tests for OS2::REXX.
1920
1921       PERL_TEST_NUMCONVERTS
1922           This sets a variable in op/numconvert.t.
1923
1924       See also the documentation for the Test and Test::Harness modules, for
1925       more environment variables that affect testing.
1926
1927   Common problems when patching Perl source code
1928       Perl source plays by ANSI C89 rules: no C99 (or C++) extensions.  In
1929       some cases we have to take pre-ANSI requirements into consideration.
1930       You don't care about some particular platform having broken Perl?  I
1931       hear there is still a strong demand for J2EE programmers.
1932
1933   Perl environment problems
1934       ·   Not compiling with threading
1935
1936           Compiling with threading (-Duseithreads) completely rewrites the
1937           function prototypes of Perl.  You better try your changes with
1938           that.  Related to this is the difference between "Perl_-less" and
1939           "Perl_-ly" APIs, for example:
1940
1941             Perl_sv_setiv(aTHX_ ...);
1942             sv_setiv(...);
1943
1944           The first one explicitly passes in the context, which is needed for
1945           e.g.  threaded builds.  The second one does that implicitly; do not
1946           get them mixed.  If you are not passing in a aTHX_, you will need
1947           to do a dTHX (or a dVAR) as the first thing in the function.
1948
1949           See "How multiple interpreters and concurrency are supported" in
1950           perlguts for further discussion about context.
1951
1952       ·   Not compiling with -DDEBUGGING
1953
1954           The DEBUGGING define exposes more code to the compiler, therefore
1955           more ways for things to go wrong.  You should try it.
1956
1957       ·   Introducing (non-read-only) globals
1958
1959           Do not introduce any modifiable globals, truly global or file
1960           static.  They are bad form and complicate multithreading and other
1961           forms of concurrency.  The right way is to introduce them as new
1962           interpreter variables, see intrpvar.h (at the very end for binary
1963           compatibility).
1964
1965           Introducing read-only (const) globals is okay, as long as you
1966           verify with e.g. "nm libperl.a|egrep -v ' [TURtr] '" (if your "nm"
1967           has BSD-style output) that the data you added really is read-only.
1968           (If it is, it shouldn't show up in the output of that command.)
1969
1970           If you want to have static strings, make them constant:
1971
1972             static const char etc[] = "...";
1973
1974           If you want to have arrays of constant strings, note carefully the
1975           right combination of "const"s:
1976
1977               static const char * const yippee[] =
1978                   {"hi", "ho", "silver"};
1979
1980           There is a way to completely hide any modifiable globals (they are
1981           all moved to heap), the compilation setting
1982           "-DPERL_GLOBAL_STRUCT_PRIVATE".  It is not normally used, but can
1983           be used for testing, read more about it in "Background and
1984           PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT" in perlguts.
1985
1986       ·   Not exporting your new function
1987
1988           Some platforms (Win32, AIX, VMS, OS/2, to name a few) require any
1989           function that is part of the public API (the shared Perl library)
1990           to be explicitly marked as exported.  See the discussion about
1991           embed.pl in perlguts.
1992
1993       ·   Exporting your new function
1994
1995           The new shiny result of either genuine new functionality or your
1996           arduous refactoring is now ready and correctly exported.  So what
1997           could possibly go wrong?
1998
1999           Maybe simply that your function did not need to be exported in the
2000           first place.  Perl has a long and not so glorious history of
2001           exporting functions that it should not have.
2002
2003           If the function is used only inside one source code file, make it
2004           static.  See the discussion about embed.pl in perlguts.
2005
2006           If the function is used across several files, but intended only for
2007           Perl's internal use (and this should be the common case), do not
2008           export it to the public API.  See the discussion about embed.pl in
2009           perlguts.
2010
2011   Portability problems
2012       The following are common causes of compilation and/or execution
2013       failures, not common to Perl as such.  The C FAQ is good bedtime
2014       reading.  Please test your changes with as many C compilers and
2015       platforms as possible; we will, anyway, and it's nice to save oneself
2016       from public embarrassment.
2017
2018       If using gcc, you can add the "-std=c89" option which will hopefully
2019       catch most of these unportabilities. (However it might also catch
2020       incompatibilities in your system's header files.)
2021
2022       Use the Configure "-Dgccansipedantic" flag to enable the gcc "-ansi
2023       -pedantic" flags which enforce stricter ANSI rules.
2024
2025       If using the "gcc -Wall" note that not all the possible warnings (like
2026       "-Wunitialized") are given unless you also compile with "-O".
2027
2028       Note that if using gcc, starting from Perl 5.9.5 the Perl core source
2029       code files (the ones at the top level of the source code distribution,
2030       but not e.g. the extensions under ext/) are automatically compiled with
2031       as many as possible of the "-std=c89", "-ansi", "-pedantic", and a
2032       selection of "-W" flags (see cflags.SH).
2033
2034       Also study perlport carefully to avoid any bad assumptions about the
2035       operating system, filesystems, and so forth.
2036
2037       You may once in a while try a "make microperl" to see whether we can
2038       still compile Perl with just the bare minimum of interfaces.  (See
2039       README.micro.)
2040
2041       Do not assume an operating system indicates a certain compiler.
2042
2043       ·   Casting pointers to integers or casting integers to pointers
2044
2045               void castaway(U8* p)
2046               {
2047                 IV i = p;
2048
2049           or
2050
2051               void castaway(U8* p)
2052               {
2053                 IV i = (IV)p;
2054
2055           Both are bad, and broken, and unportable.  Use the PTR2IV() macro
2056           that does it right.  (Likewise, there are PTR2UV(), PTR2NV(),
2057           INT2PTR(), and NUM2PTR().)
2058
2059       ·   Casting between data function pointers and data pointers
2060
2061           Technically speaking casting between function pointers and data
2062           pointers is unportable and undefined, but practically speaking it
2063           seems to work, but you should use the FPTR2DPTR() and DPTR2FPTR()
2064           macros.  Sometimes you can also play games with unions.
2065
2066       ·   Assuming sizeof(int) == sizeof(long)
2067
2068           There are platforms where longs are 64 bits, and platforms where
2069           ints are 64 bits, and while we are out to shock you, even platforms
2070           where shorts are 64 bits.  This is all legal according to the C
2071           standard.  (In other words, "long long" is not a portable way to
2072           specify 64 bits, and "long long" is not even guaranteed to be any
2073           wider than "long".)
2074
2075           Instead, use the definitions IV, UV, IVSIZE, I32SIZE, and so forth.
2076           Avoid things like I32 because they are not guaranteed to be exactly
2077           32 bits, they are at least 32 bits, nor are they guaranteed to be
2078           int or long.  If you really explicitly need 64-bit variables, use
2079           I64 and U64, but only if guarded by HAS_QUAD.
2080
2081       ·   Assuming one can dereference any type of pointer for any type of
2082           data
2083
2084             char *p = ...;
2085             long pony = *p;    /* BAD */
2086
2087           Many platforms, quite rightly so, will give you a core dump instead
2088           of a pony if the p happens not be correctly aligned.
2089
2090       ·   Lvalue casts
2091
2092             (int)*p = ...;    /* BAD */
2093
2094           Simply not portable.  Get your lvalue to be of the right type, or
2095           maybe use temporary variables, or dirty tricks with unions.
2096
2097       ·   Assume anything about structs (especially the ones you don't
2098           control, like the ones coming from the system headers)
2099
2100           ·       That a certain field exists in a struct
2101
2102           ·       That no other fields exist besides the ones you know of
2103
2104           ·       That a field is of certain signedness, sizeof, or type
2105
2106           ·       That the fields are in a certain order
2107
2108                   ·       While C guarantees the ordering specified in the
2109                           struct definition, between different platforms the
2110                           definitions might differ
2111
2112           ·       That the sizeof(struct) or the alignments are the same
2113                   everywhere
2114
2115                   ·       There might be padding bytes between the fields to
2116                           align the fields - the bytes can be anything
2117
2118                   ·       Structs are required to be aligned to the maximum
2119                           alignment required by the fields - which for native
2120                           types is for usually equivalent to sizeof() of the
2121                           field
2122
2123       ·   Assuming the character set is ASCIIish
2124
2125           Perl can compile and run under EBCDIC platforms.  See perlebcdic.
2126           This is transparent for the most part, but because the character
2127           sets differ, you shouldn't use numeric (decimal, octal, nor hex)
2128           constants to refer to characters.  You can safely say 'A', but not
2129           0x41.  You can safely say '\n', but not \012.  If a character
2130           doesn't have a trivial input form, you can create a #define for it
2131           in both "utfebcdic.h" and "utf8.h", so that it resolves to
2132           different values depending on the character set being used.  (There
2133           are three different EBCDIC character sets defined in "utfebcdic.h",
2134           so it might be best to insert the #define three times in that
2135           file.)
2136
2137           Also, the range 'A' - 'Z' in ASCII is an unbroken sequence of 26
2138           upper case alphabetic characters.  That is not true in EBCDIC.  Nor
2139           for 'a' to 'z'.  But '0' - '9' is an unbroken range in both
2140           systems.  Don't assume anything about other ranges.
2141
2142           Many of the comments in the existing code ignore the possibility of
2143           EBCDIC, and may be wrong therefore, even if the code works.  This
2144           is actually a tribute to the successful transparent insertion of
2145           being able to handle EBCDIC without having to change pre-existing
2146           code.
2147
2148           UTF-8 and UTF-EBCDIC are two different encodings used to represent
2149           Unicode code points as sequences of bytes.  Macros with the same
2150           names (but different definitions) in "utf8.h" and "utfebcdic.h" are
2151           used to allow the calling code to think that there is only one such
2152           encoding.  This is almost always referred to as "utf8", but it
2153           means the EBCDIC version as well.  Again, comments in the code may
2154           well be wrong even if the code itself is right.  For example, the
2155           concept of "invariant characters" differs between ASCII and EBCDIC.
2156           On ASCII platforms, only characters that do not have the high-order
2157           bit set (i.e. whose ordinals are strict ASCII, 0 - 127) are
2158           invariant, and the documentation and comments in the code may
2159           assume that, often referring to something like, say, "hibit".  The
2160           situation differs and is not so simple on EBCDIC machines, but as
2161           long as the code itself uses the "NATIVE_IS_INVARIANT()" macro
2162           appropriately, it works, even if the comments are wrong.
2163
2164       ·   Assuming the character set is just ASCII
2165
2166           ASCII is a 7 bit encoding, but bytes have 8 bits in them.  The 128
2167           extra characters have different meanings depending on the locale.
2168           Absent a locale, currently these extra characters are generally
2169           considered to be unassigned, and this has presented some problems.
2170           This is being changed starting in 5.12 so that these characters
2171           will be considered to be Latin-1 (ISO-8859-1).
2172
2173       ·   Mixing #define and #ifdef
2174
2175             #define BURGLE(x) ... \
2176             #ifdef BURGLE_OLD_STYLE        /* BAD */
2177             ... do it the old way ... \
2178             #else
2179             ... do it the new way ... \
2180             #endif
2181
2182           You cannot portably "stack" cpp directives.  For example in the
2183           above you need two separate BURGLE() #defines, one for each #ifdef
2184           branch.
2185
2186       ·   Adding non-comment stuff after #endif or #else
2187
2188             #ifdef SNOSH
2189             ...
2190             #else !SNOSH    /* BAD */
2191             ...
2192             #endif SNOSH    /* BAD */
2193
2194           The #endif and #else cannot portably have anything non-comment
2195           after them.  If you want to document what is going (which is a good
2196           idea especially if the branches are long), use (C) comments:
2197
2198             #ifdef SNOSH
2199             ...
2200             #else /* !SNOSH */
2201             ...
2202             #endif /* SNOSH */
2203
2204           The gcc option "-Wendif-labels" warns about the bad variant (by
2205           default on starting from Perl 5.9.4).
2206
2207       ·   Having a comma after the last element of an enum list
2208
2209             enum color {
2210               CERULEAN,
2211               CHARTREUSE,
2212               CINNABAR,     /* BAD */
2213             };
2214
2215           is not portable.  Leave out the last comma.
2216
2217           Also note that whether enums are implicitly morphable to ints
2218           varies between compilers, you might need to (int).
2219
2220       ·   Using //-comments
2221
2222             // This function bamfoodles the zorklator.    /* BAD */
2223
2224           That is C99 or C++.  Perl is C89.  Using the //-comments is
2225           silently allowed by many C compilers but cranking up the ANSI C89
2226           strictness (which we like to do) causes the compilation to fail.
2227
2228       ·   Mixing declarations and code
2229
2230             void zorklator()
2231             {
2232               int n = 3;
2233               set_zorkmids(n);    /* BAD */
2234               int q = 4;
2235
2236           That is C99 or C++.  Some C compilers allow that, but you
2237           shouldn't.
2238
2239           The gcc option "-Wdeclaration-after-statements" scans for such
2240           problems (by default on starting from Perl 5.9.4).
2241
2242       ·   Introducing variables inside for()
2243
2244             for(int i = ...; ...; ...) {    /* BAD */
2245
2246           That is C99 or C++.  While it would indeed be awfully nice to have
2247           that also in C89, to limit the scope of the loop variable, alas, we
2248           cannot.
2249
2250       ·   Mixing signed char pointers with unsigned char pointers
2251
2252             int foo(char *s) { ... }
2253             ...
2254             unsigned char *t = ...; /* Or U8* t = ... */
2255             foo(t);   /* BAD */
2256
2257           While this is legal practice, it is certainly dubious, and
2258           downright fatal in at least one platform: for example VMS cc
2259           considers this a fatal error.  One cause for people often making
2260           this mistake is that a "naked char" and therefore dereferencing a
2261           "naked char pointer" have an undefined signedness: it depends on
2262           the compiler and the flags of the compiler and the underlying
2263           platform whether the result is signed or unsigned.  For this very
2264           same reason using a 'char' as an array index is bad.
2265
2266       ·   Macros that have string constants and their arguments as substrings
2267           of the string constants
2268
2269             #define FOO(n) printf("number = %d\n", n)    /* BAD */
2270             FOO(10);
2271
2272           Pre-ANSI semantics for that was equivalent to
2273
2274             printf("10umber = %d\10");
2275
2276           which is probably not what you were expecting.  Unfortunately at
2277           least one reasonably common and modern C compiler does "real
2278           backward compatibility" here, in AIX that is what still happens
2279           even though the rest of the AIX compiler is very happily C89.
2280
2281       ·   Using printf formats for non-basic C types
2282
2283              IV i = ...;
2284              printf("i = %d\n", i);    /* BAD */
2285
2286           While this might by accident work in some platform (where IV
2287           happens to be an "int"), in general it cannot.  IV might be
2288           something larger.  Even worse the situation is with more specific
2289           types (defined by Perl's configuration step in config.h):
2290
2291              Uid_t who = ...;
2292              printf("who = %d\n", who);    /* BAD */
2293
2294           The problem here is that Uid_t might be not only not "int"-wide but
2295           it might also be unsigned, in which case large uids would be
2296           printed as negative values.
2297
2298           There is no simple solution to this because of printf()'s limited
2299           intelligence, but for many types the right format is available as
2300           with either 'f' or '_f' suffix, for example:
2301
2302              IVdf /* IV in decimal */
2303              UVxf /* UV is hexadecimal */
2304
2305              printf("i = %"IVdf"\n", i); /* The IVdf is a string constant. */
2306
2307              Uid_t_f /* Uid_t in decimal */
2308
2309              printf("who = %"Uid_t_f"\n", who);
2310
2311           Or you can try casting to a "wide enough" type:
2312
2313              printf("i = %"IVdf"\n", (IV)something_very_small_and_signed);
2314
2315           Also remember that the %p format really does require a void
2316           pointer:
2317
2318              U8* p = ...;
2319              printf("p = %p\n", (void*)p);
2320
2321           The gcc option "-Wformat" scans for such problems.
2322
2323       ·   Blindly using variadic macros
2324
2325           gcc has had them for a while with its own syntax, and C99 brought
2326           them with a standardized syntax.  Don't use the former, and use the
2327           latter only if the HAS_C99_VARIADIC_MACROS is defined.
2328
2329       ·   Blindly passing va_list
2330
2331           Not all platforms support passing va_list to further varargs
2332           (stdarg) functions.  The right thing to do is to copy the va_list
2333           using the Perl_va_copy() if the NEED_VA_COPY is defined.
2334
2335       ·   Using gcc statement expressions
2336
2337              val = ({...;...;...});    /* BAD */
2338
2339           While a nice extension, it's not portable.  The Perl code does
2340           admittedly use them if available to gain some extra speed
2341           (essentially as a funky form of inlining), but you shouldn't.
2342
2343       ·   Binding together several statements in a macro
2344
2345           Use the macros STMT_START and STMT_END.
2346
2347              STMT_START {
2348                 ...
2349              } STMT_END
2350
2351       ·   Testing for operating systems or versions when should be testing
2352           for features
2353
2354             #ifdef __FOONIX__    /* BAD */
2355             foo = quux();
2356             #endif
2357
2358           Unless you know with 100% certainty that quux() is only ever
2359           available for the "Foonix" operating system and that is available
2360           and correctly working for all past, present, and future versions of
2361           "Foonix", the above is very wrong.  This is more correct (though
2362           still not perfect, because the below is a compile-time check):
2363
2364             #ifdef HAS_QUUX
2365             foo = quux();
2366             #endif
2367
2368           How does the HAS_QUUX become defined where it needs to be?  Well,
2369           if Foonix happens to be Unixy enough to be able to run the
2370           Configure script, and Configure has been taught about detecting and
2371           testing quux(), the HAS_QUUX will be correctly defined.  In other
2372           platforms, the corresponding configuration step will hopefully do
2373           the same.
2374
2375           In a pinch, if you cannot wait for Configure to be educated, or if
2376           you have a good hunch of where quux() might be available, you can
2377           temporarily try the following:
2378
2379             #if (defined(__FOONIX__) || defined(__BARNIX__))
2380             # define HAS_QUUX
2381             #endif
2382
2383             ...
2384
2385             #ifdef HAS_QUUX
2386             foo = quux();
2387             #endif
2388
2389           But in any case, try to keep the features and operating systems
2390           separate.
2391
2392   Problematic System Interfaces
2393       ·   malloc(0), realloc(0), calloc(0, 0) are non-portable.  To be
2394           portable allocate at least one byte.  (In general you should rarely
2395           need to work at this low level, but instead use the various malloc
2396           wrappers.)
2397
2398       ·   snprintf() - the return type is unportable.  Use my_snprintf()
2399           instead.
2400
2401   Security problems
2402       Last but not least, here are various tips for safer coding.
2403
2404       ·   Do not use gets()
2405
2406           Or we will publicly ridicule you.  Seriously.
2407
2408       ·   Do not use strcpy() or strcat() or strncpy() or strncat()
2409
2410           Use my_strlcpy() and my_strlcat() instead: they either use the
2411           native implementation, or Perl's own implementation (borrowed from
2412           the public domain implementation of INN).
2413
2414       ·   Do not use sprintf() or vsprintf()
2415
2416           If you really want just plain byte strings, use my_snprintf() and
2417           my_vsnprintf() instead, which will try to use snprintf() and
2418           vsnprintf() if those safer APIs are available.  If you want
2419           something fancier than a plain byte string, use SVs and
2420           Perl_sv_catpvf().
2421

EXTERNAL TOOLS FOR DEBUGGING PERL

2423       Sometimes it helps to use external tools while debugging and testing
2424       Perl.  This section tries to guide you through using some common
2425       testing and debugging tools with Perl.  This is meant as a guide to
2426       interfacing these tools with Perl, not as any kind of guide to the use
2427       of the tools themselves.
2428
2429       NOTE 1: Running under memory debuggers such as Purify, valgrind, or
2430       Third Degree greatly slows down the execution: seconds become minutes,
2431       minutes become hours.  For example as of Perl 5.8.1, the
2432       ext/Encode/t/Unicode.t takes extraordinarily long to complete under
2433       e.g. Purify, Third Degree, and valgrind.  Under valgrind it takes more
2434       than six hours, even on a snappy computer. The said test must be doing
2435       something that is quite unfriendly for memory debuggers.  If you don't
2436       feel like waiting, that you can simply kill away the perl process.
2437
2438       NOTE 2: To minimize the number of memory leak false alarms (see
2439       "PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL" for more information), you have to set the
2440       environment variable PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL to 2.
2441
2442       For csh-like shells:
2443
2444           setenv PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL 2
2445
2446       For Bourne-type shells:
2447
2448           PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL=2
2449           export PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL
2450
2451       In Unixy environments you can also use the "env" command:
2452
2453           env PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL=2 valgrind ./perl -Ilib ...
2454
2455       NOTE 3: There are known memory leaks when there are compile-time errors
2456       within eval or require, seeing "S_doeval" in the call stack is a good
2457       sign of these.  Fixing these leaks is non-trivial, unfortunately, but
2458       they must be fixed eventually.
2459
2460       NOTE 4: DynaLoader will not clean up after itself completely unless
2461       Perl is built with the Configure option
2462       "-Accflags=-DDL_UNLOAD_ALL_AT_EXIT".
2463
2464   Rational Software's Purify
2465       Purify is a commercial tool that is helpful in identifying memory
2466       overruns, wild pointers, memory leaks and other such badness.  Perl
2467       must be compiled in a specific way for optimal testing with Purify.
2468       Purify is available under Windows NT, Solaris, HP-UX, SGI, and Siemens
2469       Unix.
2470
2471   Purify on Unix
2472       On Unix, Purify creates a new Perl binary.  To get the most benefit out
2473       of Purify, you should create the perl to Purify using:
2474
2475           sh Configure -Accflags=-DPURIFY -Doptimize='-g' \
2476            -Uusemymalloc -Dusemultiplicity
2477
2478       where these arguments mean:
2479
2480       -Accflags=-DPURIFY
2481           Disables Perl's arena memory allocation functions, as well as
2482           forcing use of memory allocation functions derived from the system
2483           malloc.
2484
2485       -Doptimize='-g'
2486           Adds debugging information so that you see the exact source
2487           statements where the problem occurs.  Without this flag, all you
2488           will see is the source filename of where the error occurred.
2489
2490       -Uusemymalloc
2491           Disable Perl's malloc so that Purify can more closely monitor
2492           allocations and leaks.  Using Perl's malloc will make Purify report
2493           most leaks in the "potential" leaks category.
2494
2495       -Dusemultiplicity
2496           Enabling the multiplicity option allows perl to clean up thoroughly
2497           when the interpreter shuts down, which reduces the number of bogus
2498           leak reports from Purify.
2499
2500       Once you've compiled a perl suitable for Purify'ing, then you can just:
2501
2502           make pureperl
2503
2504       which creates a binary named 'pureperl' that has been Purify'ed.  This
2505       binary is used in place of the standard 'perl' binary when you want to
2506       debug Perl memory problems.
2507
2508       As an example, to show any memory leaks produced during the standard
2509       Perl testset you would create and run the Purify'ed perl as:
2510
2511           make pureperl
2512           cd t
2513           ../pureperl -I../lib harness
2514
2515       which would run Perl on test.pl and report any memory problems.
2516
2517       Purify outputs messages in "Viewer" windows by default.  If you don't
2518       have a windowing environment or if you simply want the Purify output to
2519       unobtrusively go to a log file instead of to the interactive window,
2520       use these following options to output to the log file "perl.log":
2521
2522           setenv PURIFYOPTIONS "-chain-length=25 -windows=no \
2523            -log-file=perl.log -append-logfile=yes"
2524
2525       If you plan to use the "Viewer" windows, then you only need this
2526       option:
2527
2528           setenv PURIFYOPTIONS "-chain-length=25"
2529
2530       In Bourne-type shells:
2531
2532           PURIFYOPTIONS="..."
2533           export PURIFYOPTIONS
2534
2535       or if you have the "env" utility:
2536
2537           env PURIFYOPTIONS="..." ../pureperl ...
2538
2539   Purify on NT
2540       Purify on Windows NT instruments the Perl binary 'perl.exe' on the fly.
2541       There are several options in the makefile you should change to get the
2542       most use out of Purify:
2543
2544       DEFINES
2545           You should add -DPURIFY to the DEFINES line so the DEFINES line
2546           looks something like:
2547
2548              DEFINES = -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT $(CRYPT_FLAG) -DPURIFY=1
2549
2550           to disable Perl's arena memory allocation functions, as well as to
2551           force use of memory allocation functions derived from the system
2552           malloc.
2553
2554       USE_MULTI = define
2555           Enabling the multiplicity option allows perl to clean up thoroughly
2556           when the interpreter shuts down, which reduces the number of bogus
2557           leak reports from Purify.
2558
2559       #PERL_MALLOC = define
2560           Disable Perl's malloc so that Purify can more closely monitor
2561           allocations and leaks.  Using Perl's malloc will make Purify report
2562           most leaks in the "potential" leaks category.
2563
2564       CFG = Debug
2565           Adds debugging information so that you see the exact source
2566           statements where the problem occurs.  Without this flag, all you
2567           will see is the source filename of where the error occurred.
2568
2569       As an example, to show any memory leaks produced during the standard
2570       Perl testset you would create and run Purify as:
2571
2572           cd win32
2573           make
2574           cd ../t
2575           purify ../perl -I../lib harness
2576
2577       which would instrument Perl in memory, run Perl on test.pl, then
2578       finally report any memory problems.
2579
2580   valgrind
2581       The excellent valgrind tool can be used to find out both memory leaks
2582       and illegal memory accesses.  As of version 3.3.0, Valgrind only
2583       supports Linux on x86, x86-64 and PowerPC.  The special "test.valgrind"
2584       target can be used to run the tests under valgrind.  Found errors and
2585       memory leaks are logged in files named testfile.valgrind.
2586
2587       Valgrind also provides a cachegrind tool, invoked on perl as:
2588
2589           VG_OPTS=--tool=cachegrind make test.valgrind
2590
2591       As system libraries (most notably glibc) are also triggering errors,
2592       valgrind allows to suppress such errors using suppression files. The
2593       default suppression file that comes with valgrind already catches a lot
2594       of them. Some additional suppressions are defined in t/perl.supp.
2595
2596       To get valgrind and for more information see
2597
2598           http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/
2599
2600   Compaq's/Digital's/HP's Third Degree
2601       Third Degree is a tool for memory leak detection and memory access
2602       checks.  It is one of the many tools in the ATOM toolkit.  The toolkit
2603       is only available on Tru64 (formerly known as Digital UNIX formerly
2604       known as DEC OSF/1).
2605
2606       When building Perl, you must first run Configure with -Doptimize=-g and
2607       -Uusemymalloc flags, after that you can use the make targets
2608       "perl.third" and "test.third".  (What is required is that Perl must be
2609       compiled using the "-g" flag, you may need to re-Configure.)
2610
2611       The short story is that with "atom" you can instrument the Perl
2612       executable to create a new executable called perl.third.  When the
2613       instrumented executable is run, it creates a log of dubious memory
2614       traffic in file called perl.3log.  See the manual pages of atom and
2615       third for more information.  The most extensive Third Degree
2616       documentation is available in the Compaq "Tru64 UNIX Programmer's
2617       Guide", chapter "Debugging Programs with Third Degree".
2618
2619       The "test.third" leaves a lot of files named foo_bar.3log in the t/
2620       subdirectory.  There is a problem with these files: Third Degree is so
2621       effective that it finds problems also in the system libraries.
2622       Therefore you should used the Porting/thirdclean script to cleanup the
2623       *.3log files.
2624
2625       There are also leaks that for given certain definition of a leak,
2626       aren't.  See "PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL" for more information.
2627
2628   PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL
2629       If you want to run any of the tests yourself manually using e.g.
2630       valgrind, or the pureperl or perl.third executables, please note that
2631       by default perl does not explicitly cleanup all the memory it has
2632       allocated (such as global memory arenas) but instead lets the exit() of
2633       the whole program "take care" of such allocations, also known as
2634       "global destruction of objects".
2635
2636       There is a way to tell perl to do complete cleanup: set the environment
2637       variable PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL to a non-zero value.  The t/TEST wrapper
2638       does set this to 2, and this is what you need to do too, if you don't
2639       want to see the "global leaks": For example, for "third-degreed" Perl:
2640
2641               env PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL=2 ./perl.third -Ilib t/foo/bar.t
2642
2643       (Note: the mod_perl apache module uses also this environment variable
2644       for its own purposes and extended its semantics. Refer to the mod_perl
2645       documentation for more information. Also, spawned threads do the
2646       equivalent of setting this variable to the value 1.)
2647
2648       If, at the end of a run you get the message N scalars leaked, you can
2649       recompile with "-DDEBUG_LEAKING_SCALARS", which will cause the
2650       addresses of all those leaked SVs to be dumped along with details as to
2651       where each SV was originally allocated. This information is also
2652       displayed by Devel::Peek. Note that the extra details recorded with
2653       each SV increases memory usage, so it shouldn't be used in production
2654       environments. It also converts "new_SV()" from a macro into a real
2655       function, so you can use your favourite debugger to discover where
2656       those pesky SVs were allocated.
2657
2658       If you see that you're leaking memory at runtime, but neither valgrind
2659       nor "-DDEBUG_LEAKING_SCALARS" will find anything, you're probably
2660       leaking SVs that are still reachable and will be properly cleaned up
2661       during destruction of the interpreter. In such cases, using the "-Dm"
2662       switch can point you to the source of the leak. If the executable was
2663       built with "-DDEBUG_LEAKING_SCALARS", "-Dm" will output SV allocations
2664       in addition to memory allocations. Each SV allocation has a distinct
2665       serial number that will be written on creation and destruction of the
2666       SV.  So if you're executing the leaking code in a loop, you need to
2667       look for SVs that are created, but never destroyed between each cycle.
2668       If such an SV is found, set a conditional breakpoint within "new_SV()"
2669       and make it break only when "PL_sv_serial" is equal to the serial
2670       number of the leaking SV. Then you will catch the interpreter in
2671       exactly the state where the leaking SV is allocated, which is
2672       sufficient in many cases to find the source of the leak.
2673
2674       As "-Dm" is using the PerlIO layer for output, it will by itself
2675       allocate quite a bunch of SVs, which are hidden to avoid recursion.
2676       You can bypass the PerlIO layer if you use the SV logging provided by
2677       "-DPERL_MEM_LOG" instead.
2678
2679   PERL_MEM_LOG
2680       If compiled with "-DPERL_MEM_LOG", both memory and SV allocations go
2681       through logging functions, which is handy for breakpoint setting.
2682
2683       Unless "-DPERL_MEM_LOG_NOIMPL" is also compiled, the logging functions
2684       read $ENV{PERL_MEM_LOG} to determine whether to log the event, and if
2685       so how:
2686
2687           $ENV{PERL_MEM_LOG} =~ /m/           Log all memory ops
2688           $ENV{PERL_MEM_LOG} =~ /s/           Log all SV ops
2689           $ENV{PERL_MEM_LOG} =~ /t/           include timestamp in Log
2690           $ENV{PERL_MEM_LOG} =~ /^(\d+)/      write to FD given (default is 2)
2691
2692       Memory logging is somewhat similar to "-Dm" but is independent of
2693       "-DDEBUGGING", and at a higher level; all uses of Newx(), Renew(), and
2694       Safefree() are logged with the caller's source code file and line
2695       number (and C function name, if supported by the C compiler).  In
2696       contrast, "-Dm" is directly at the point of "malloc()".  SV logging is
2697       similar.
2698
2699       Since the logging doesn't use PerlIO, all SV allocations are logged and
2700       no extra SV allocations are introduced by enabling the logging.  If
2701       compiled with "-DDEBUG_LEAKING_SCALARS", the serial number for each SV
2702       allocation is also logged.
2703
2704   Profiling
2705       Depending on your platform there are various of profiling Perl.
2706
2707       There are two commonly used techniques of profiling executables:
2708       statistical time-sampling and basic-block counting.
2709
2710       The first method takes periodically samples of the CPU program counter,
2711       and since the program counter can be correlated with the code generated
2712       for functions, we get a statistical view of in which functions the
2713       program is spending its time.  The caveats are that very small/fast
2714       functions have lower probability of showing up in the profile, and that
2715       periodically interrupting the program (this is usually done rather
2716       frequently, in the scale of milliseconds) imposes an additional
2717       overhead that may skew the results.  The first problem can be
2718       alleviated by running the code for longer (in general this is a good
2719       idea for profiling), the second problem is usually kept in guard by the
2720       profiling tools themselves.
2721
2722       The second method divides up the generated code into basic blocks.
2723       Basic blocks are sections of code that are entered only in the
2724       beginning and exited only at the end.  For example, a conditional jump
2725       starts a basic block.  Basic block profiling usually works by
2726       instrumenting the code by adding enter basic block #nnnn book-keeping
2727       code to the generated code.  During the execution of the code the basic
2728       block counters are then updated appropriately.  The caveat is that the
2729       added extra code can skew the results: again, the profiling tools
2730       usually try to factor their own effects out of the results.
2731
2732   Gprof Profiling
2733       gprof is a profiling tool available in many Unix platforms, it uses
2734       statistical time-sampling.
2735
2736       You can build a profiled version of perl called "perl.gprof" by
2737       invoking the make target "perl.gprof"  (What is required is that Perl
2738       must be compiled using the "-pg" flag, you may need to re-Configure).
2739       Running the profiled version of Perl will create an output file called
2740       gmon.out is created which contains the profiling data collected during
2741       the execution.
2742
2743       The gprof tool can then display the collected data in various ways.
2744       Usually gprof understands the following options:
2745
2746       -a  Suppress statically defined functions from the profile.
2747
2748       -b  Suppress the verbose descriptions in the profile.
2749
2750       -e routine
2751           Exclude the given routine and its descendants from the profile.
2752
2753       -f routine
2754           Display only the given routine and its descendants in the profile.
2755
2756       -s  Generate a summary file called gmon.sum which then may be given to
2757           subsequent gprof runs to accumulate data over several runs.
2758
2759       -z  Display routines that have zero usage.
2760
2761       For more detailed explanation of the available commands and output
2762       formats, see your own local documentation of gprof.
2763
2764       quick hint:
2765
2766           $ sh Configure -des -Dusedevel -Doptimize='-pg' && make perl.gprof
2767           $ ./perl.gprof someprog # creates gmon.out in current directory
2768           $ gprof ./perl.gprof > out
2769           $ view out
2770
2771   GCC gcov Profiling
2772       Starting from GCC 3.0 basic block profiling is officially available for
2773       the GNU CC.
2774
2775       You can build a profiled version of perl called perl.gcov by invoking
2776       the make target "perl.gcov" (what is required that Perl must be
2777       compiled using gcc with the flags "-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage", you
2778       may need to re-Configure).
2779
2780       Running the profiled version of Perl will cause profile output to be
2781       generated.  For each source file an accompanying ".da" file will be
2782       created.
2783
2784       To display the results you use the "gcov" utility (which should be
2785       installed if you have gcc 3.0 or newer installed).  gcov is run on
2786       source code files, like this
2787
2788           gcov sv.c
2789
2790       which will cause sv.c.gcov to be created.  The .gcov files contain the
2791       source code annotated with relative frequencies of execution indicated
2792       by "#" markers.
2793
2794       Useful options of gcov include "-b" which will summarise the basic
2795       block, branch, and function call coverage, and "-c" which instead of
2796       relative frequencies will use the actual counts.  For more information
2797       on the use of gcov and basic block profiling with gcc, see the latest
2798       GNU CC manual, as of GCC 3.0 see
2799
2800           http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.0/gcc.html
2801
2802       and its section titled "8. gcov: a Test Coverage Program"
2803
2804           http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.0/gcc_8.html#SEC132
2805
2806       quick hint:
2807
2808           $ sh Configure -des  -Doptimize='-g' -Accflags='-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage' \
2809               -Aldflags='-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage' && make perl.gcov
2810           $ rm -f regexec.c.gcov regexec.gcda
2811           $ ./perl.gcov
2812           $ gcov regexec.c
2813           $ view regexec.c.gcov
2814
2815   Pixie Profiling
2816       Pixie is a profiling tool available on IRIX and Tru64 (aka Digital UNIX
2817       aka DEC OSF/1) platforms.  Pixie does its profiling using basic-block
2818       counting.
2819
2820       You can build a profiled version of perl called perl.pixie by invoking
2821       the make target "perl.pixie" (what is required is that Perl must be
2822       compiled using the "-g" flag, you may need to re-Configure).
2823
2824       In Tru64 a file called perl.Addrs will also be silently created, this
2825       file contains the addresses of the basic blocks.  Running the profiled
2826       version of Perl will create a new file called "perl.Counts" which
2827       contains the counts for the basic block for that particular program
2828       execution.
2829
2830       To display the results you use the prof utility.  The exact incantation
2831       depends on your operating system, "prof perl.Counts" in IRIX, and "prof
2832       -pixie -all -L. perl" in Tru64.
2833
2834       In IRIX the following prof options are available:
2835
2836       -h  Reports the most heavily used lines in descending order of use.
2837           Useful for finding the hotspot lines.
2838
2839       -l  Groups lines by procedure, with procedures sorted in descending
2840           order of use.  Within a procedure, lines are listed in source
2841           order.  Useful for finding the hotspots of procedures.
2842
2843       In Tru64 the following options are available:
2844
2845       -p[rocedures]
2846           Procedures sorted in descending order by the number of cycles
2847           executed in each procedure.  Useful for finding the hotspot
2848           procedures.  (This is the default option.)
2849
2850       -h[eavy]
2851           Lines sorted in descending order by the number of cycles executed
2852           in each line.  Useful for finding the hotspot lines.
2853
2854       -i[nvocations]
2855           The called procedures are sorted in descending order by number of
2856           calls made to the procedures.  Useful for finding the most used
2857           procedures.
2858
2859       -l[ines]
2860           Grouped by procedure, sorted by cycles executed per procedure.
2861           Useful for finding the hotspots of procedures.
2862
2863       -testcoverage
2864           The compiler emitted code for these lines, but the code was
2865           unexecuted.
2866
2867       -z[ero]
2868           Unexecuted procedures.
2869
2870       For further information, see your system's manual pages for pixie and
2871       prof.
2872
2873   Miscellaneous tricks
2874       ·   Those debugging perl with the DDD frontend over gdb may find the
2875           following useful:
2876
2877           You can extend the data conversion shortcuts menu, so for example
2878           you can display an SV's IV value with one click, without doing any
2879           typing.  To do that simply edit ~/.ddd/init file and add after:
2880
2881             ! Display shortcuts.
2882             Ddd*gdbDisplayShortcuts: \
2883             /t ()   // Convert to Bin\n\
2884             /d ()   // Convert to Dec\n\
2885             /x ()   // Convert to Hex\n\
2886             /o ()   // Convert to Oct(\n\
2887
2888           the following two lines:
2889
2890             ((XPV*) (())->sv_any )->xpv_pv  // 2pvx\n\
2891             ((XPVIV*) (())->sv_any )->xiv_iv // 2ivx
2892
2893           so now you can do ivx and pvx lookups or you can plug there the
2894           sv_peek "conversion":
2895
2896             Perl_sv_peek(my_perl, (SV*)()) // sv_peek
2897
2898           (The my_perl is for threaded builds.)  Just remember that every
2899           line, but the last one, should end with \n\
2900
2901           Alternatively edit the init file interactively via: 3rd mouse
2902           button -> New Display -> Edit Menu
2903
2904           Note: you can define up to 20 conversion shortcuts in the gdb
2905           section.
2906
2907       ·   If you see in a debugger a memory area mysteriously full of
2908           0xABABABAB or 0xEFEFEFEF, you may be seeing the effect of the
2909           Poison() macros, see perlclib.
2910
2911       ·   Under ithreads the optree is read only. If you want to enforce
2912           this, to check for write accesses from buggy code, compile with
2913           "-DPL_OP_SLAB_ALLOC" to enable the OP slab allocator and
2914           "-DPERL_DEBUG_READONLY_OPS" to enable code that allocates op memory
2915           via "mmap", and sets it read-only at run time.  Any write access to
2916           an op results in a "SIGBUS" and abort.
2917
2918           This code is intended for development only, and may not be portable
2919           even to all Unix variants. Also, it is an 80% solution, in that it
2920           isn't able to make all ops read only. Specifically it
2921
2922           1.  Only sets read-only on all slabs of ops at "CHECK" time, hence
2923               ops allocated later via "require" or "eval" will be re-write
2924
2925           2.  Turns an entire slab of ops read-write if the refcount of any
2926               op in the slab needs to be decreased.
2927
2928           3.  Turns an entire slab of ops read-write if any op from the slab
2929               is freed.
2930
2931           It's not possible to turn the slabs to read-only after an action
2932           requiring read-write access, as either can happen during op tree
2933           building time, so there may still be legitimate write access.
2934
2935           However, as an 80% solution it is still effective, as currently it
2936           catches a write access during the generation of Config.pm, which
2937           means that we can't yet build perl with this enabled.
2938

CONCLUSION

2940       We've had a brief look around the Perl source, how to maintain quality
2941       of the source code, an overview of the stages perl goes through when
2942       it's running your code, how to use debuggers to poke at the Perl guts,
2943       and finally how to analyse the execution of Perl. We took a very simple
2944       problem and demonstrated how to solve it fully - with documentation,
2945       regression tests, and finally a patch for submission to p5p.  Finally,
2946       we talked about how to use external tools to debug and test Perl.
2947
2948       I'd now suggest you read over those references again, and then, as soon
2949       as possible, get your hands dirty. The best way to learn is by doing,
2950       so:
2951
2952       ·  Subscribe to perl5-porters, follow the patches and try and
2953          understand them; don't be afraid to ask if there's a portion you're
2954          not clear on - who knows, you may unearth a bug in the patch...
2955
2956       ·  Keep up to date with the bleeding edge Perl distributions and get
2957          familiar with the changes. Try and get an idea of what areas people
2958          are working on and the changes they're making.
2959
2960       ·  Do read the README associated with your operating system, e.g.
2961          README.aix on the IBM AIX OS. Don't hesitate to supply patches to
2962          that README if you find anything missing or changed over a new OS
2963          release.
2964
2965       ·  Find an area of Perl that seems interesting to you, and see if you
2966          can work out how it works. Scan through the source, and step over it
2967          in the debugger. Play, poke, investigate, fiddle! You'll probably
2968          get to understand not just your chosen area but a much wider range
2969          of perl's activity as well, and probably sooner than you'd think.
2970
2971       The Road goes ever on and on, down from the door where it began.
2972
2973       If you can do these things, you've started on the long road to Perl
2974       porting.  Thanks for wanting to help make Perl better - and happy
2975       hacking!
2976
2977   Metaphoric Quotations
2978       If you recognized the quote about the Road above, you're in luck.
2979
2980       Most software projects begin each file with a literal description of
2981       each file's purpose.  Perl instead begins each with a literary allusion
2982       to that file's purpose.
2983
2984       Like chapters in many books, all top-level Perl source files (along
2985       with a few others here and there) begin with an epigramic inscription
2986       that alludes, indirectly and metaphorically, to the material you're
2987       about to read.
2988
2989       Quotations are taken from writings of J.R.R Tolkien pertaining to his
2990       Legendarium, almost always from The Lord of the Rings.  Chapters and
2991       page numbers are given using the following editions:
2992
2993       ·   The Hobbit, by J.R.R. Tolkien.  The hardcover, 70th-anniversary
2994           edition of 2007 was used, published in the UK by Harper Collins
2995           Publishers and in the US by the Houghton Mifflin Company.
2996
2997       ·   The Lord of the Rings, by J.R.R. Tolkien.  The hardcover,
2998           50th-anniversary edition of 2004 was used, published in the UK by
2999           Harper Collins Publishers and in the US by the Houghton Mifflin
3000           Company.
3001
3002       ·   The Lays of Beleriand, by J.R.R. Tolkien and published posthumously
3003           by his son and literary executor, C.J.R. Tolkien, being the 3rd of
3004           the 12 volumes in Christopher's mammoth History of Middle Earth.
3005           Page numbers derive from the hardcover edition, first published in
3006           1983 by George Allen & Unwin; no page numbers changed for the
3007           special 3-volume omnibus edition of 2002 or the various trade-paper
3008           editions, all again now by Harper Collins or Houghton Mifflin.
3009
3010       Other JRRT books fair game for quotes would thus include The Adventures
3011       of Tom Bombadil, The Silmarillion, Unfinished Tales, and The Tale of
3012       the Children of Hurin, all but the first posthumously assembled by
3013       CJRT.  But The Lord of the Rings itself is perfectly fine and probably
3014       best to quote from, provided you can find a suitable quote there.
3015
3016       So if you were to supply a new, complete, top-level source file to add
3017       to Perl, you should conform to this peculiar practice by yourself
3018       selecting an appropriate quotation from Tolkien, retaining the original
3019       spelling and punctuation and using the same format the rest of the
3020       quotes are in.  Indirect and oblique is just fine; remember, it's a
3021       metaphor, so being meta is, after all, what it's for.
3022

AUTHOR

3024       This document was written by Nathan Torkington, and is maintained by
3025       the perl5-porters mailing list.
3026

SEE ALSO

3028       perlrepository
3029
3030
3031
3032perl v5.12.4                      2011-06-07                       PERLHACK(1)
Impressum