1FREEIPMI_INTERPRET_SENSOR(5)     Configuration    FREEIPMI_INTERPRET_SENSOR(5)
2
3
4

NAME

6       freeipmi_interpret_sensor.conf - specify sensor interpretation rules
7

DESCRIPTION

9       The /etc/freeipmi//freeipmi_interpret_sensor.conf defines how IPMI sen‐
10       sors should be interpreted. IPMI based  sensors  specify  a  number  of
11       states/thresholds when they are read. Based on those states/thresholds,
12       libraries and tools such as  libfreeipmi(3),  libipmimonitoring(3)  and
13       ipmi-sensors(8) can report if a sensor reading is "good" or "bad" via a
14       report of a NOMINAL, WARNING, or CRITICAL state.
15
16       Each of the states listed below are (hopefully) descriptive  enough  to
17       describe  the  state  conditions  that may be set/unset for each sensor
18       type. For more detailed information on each of  the  individual  states
19       listed  below, please see the IPMI Specification "Sensor and Event Code
20       Tables".  Ipmi-sensors(8) can be used to determine the sensor types and
21       the states/thresholds that exist on a system by outputting very verbose
22       output and seeing what types of Assertion  or  Deassertion  events  are
23       possible.
24
25       The possible values for all states/thresholds below are:
26
27       Nominal - Signal Nominal reading if state/threshold tripped
28
29       Warning - Signal Warning reading if state/treshold tripped
30
31       Critical - Signal Critical reading if state/threshold tripped
32
33       Not  all  IPMI sensor types and event types are currently supported. If
34       you would like more to be supported, please e-mail the FreeIPMI mailing
35       list.
36
37       The  default  values  selected  for  individual states/thresholds being
38       tripped are based on best guesses and motherboards being analyzed.   If
39       you  think  they  should be changed, please e-mail the FreeIPMI mailing
40       list to discuss what the defaults should be.
41
42       Most default interpretations can be determined  quite  easily  and  can
43       meet  the  needs  of  most  users.  For  example, a reading of "Perfor‐
44       mance_Met" is normally better than "Performance_Lags".   However,  some
45       sensors can be ambiguous and depend completely on the manufacturer. For
46       example, "State_Asserted" vs. "State_Deasserted" are completely at  the
47       interpretation of the vendor. Users are advised to adjust the interpre‐
48       tations below as needed for their machines.
49
50       Every group of state conditions  below  includes  a  configuration  for
51       "No_Event".  This  is the condition under which no sensor states/events
52       have occurred or are triggered. Under most  conditions,  a  mapping  to
53       "Nominal"  is  preferred.  However, under some circumstances, it may be
54       useful to report something else. For example, if a sensor on a particu