1DLAED1(1)                LAPACK routine (version 3.2)                DLAED1(1)
2
3
4

NAME

6       DLAED1  -  computes  the updated eigensystem of a diagonal matrix after
7       modification by a rank-one symmetric matrix
8

SYNOPSIS

10       SUBROUTINE DLAED1( N, D, Q, LDQ, INDXQ, RHO, CUTPNT, WORK, IWORK,  INFO
11                          )
12
13           INTEGER        CUTPNT, INFO, LDQ, N
14
15           DOUBLE         PRECISION RHO
16
17           INTEGER        INDXQ( * ), IWORK( * )
18
19           DOUBLE         PRECISION D( * ), Q( LDQ, * ), WORK( * )
20

PURPOSE

22       DLAED1 computes the updated eigensystem of a diagonal matrix after mod‐
23       ification by a rank-one symmetric matrix.  This routine  is  used  only
24       for the eigenproblem which requires all eigenvalues and eigenvectors of
25       a tridiagonal matrix.  DLAED7 handles the  case  in  which  eigenvalues
26       only  or eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a full symmetric matrix (which
27       was reduced to tridiagonal form) are desired.
28         T = Q(in) ( D(in) + RHO * Z*Z' ) Q'(in) = Q(out) * D(out) * Q'(out)
29          where Z = Q'u, u is a vector of length N with ones in the
30          CUTPNT and CUTPNT + 1 th elements and zeros elsewhere.
31          The eigenvectors of the original matrix are stored in Q, and the
32          eigenvalues are in D.  The algorithm consists of three stages:
33             The first stage consists of deflating the size of the problem
34             when there are multiple eigenvalues or if there is a zero in
35             the Z vector.  For each such occurence the dimension of the
36             secular equation problem is reduced by one.  This stage is
37             performed by the routine DLAED2.
38             The second stage consists of calculating the updated
39             eigenvalues. This is done by finding the roots of the secular
40             equation via the routine DLAED4 (as called by DLAED3).
41             This routine also calculates the eigenvectors of the current
42             problem.
43             The final stage consists of computing the updated eigenvectors
44             directly using the updated eigenvalues.  The eigenvectors for
45             the current problem are multiplied with the eigenvectors from
46             the overall problem.
47

ARGUMENTS

49       N      (input) INTEGER
50              The dimension of the symmetric tridiagonal matrix.  N >= 0.
51
52       D      (input/output) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (N)
53              On entry, the eigenvalues of the  rank-1-perturbed  matrix.   On
54              exit, the eigenvalues of the repaired matrix.
55
56       Q      (input/output) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (LDQ,N)
57              On  entry,  the eigenvectors of the rank-1-perturbed matrix.  On
58              exit, the eigenvectors of the repaired tridiagonal matrix.
59
60       LDQ    (input) INTEGER
61              The leading dimension of the array Q.  LDQ >= max(1,N).
62
63       INDXQ  (input/output) INTEGER array, dimension (N)
64              On entry, the permutation which separately sorts  the  two  sub‐
65              problems  in  D  into ascending order.  On exit, the permutation
66              which will reintegrate the subproblems back into  sorted  order,
67              i.e. D( INDXQ( I = 1, N ) ) will be in ascending order.
68
69       RHO    (input) DOUBLE PRECISION
70              The  subdiagonal  entry  used to create the rank-1 modification.
71              CUTPNT (input) INTEGER The location of the  last  eigenvalue  in
72              the leading sub-matrix.  min(1,N) <= CUTPNT <= N/2.
73
74       WORK   (workspace) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (4*N + N**2)
75
76       IWORK  (workspace) INTEGER array, dimension (4*N)
77
78       INFO   (output) INTEGER
79              = 0:  successful exit.
80              < 0:  if INFO = -i, the i-th argument had an illegal value.
81              > 0:  if INFO = 1, an eigenvalue did not converge
82

FURTHER DETAILS

84       Based on contributions by
85          Jeff Rutter, Computer Science Division, University of California
86          at Berkeley, USA
87       Modified by Francoise Tisseur, University of Tennessee.
88
89
90
91 LAPACK routine (version 3.2)    November 2008                       DLAED1(1)
Impressum