1Math::Complex(3pm) Perl Programmers Reference Guide Math::Complex(3pm)
2
3
4
6 Math::Complex - complex numbers and associated mathematical functions
7
9 use Math::Complex;
10
11 $z = Math::Complex->make(5, 6);
12 $t = 4 - 3*i + $z;
13 $j = cplxe(1, 2*pi/3);
14
16 This package lets you create and manipulate complex numbers. By
17 default, Perl limits itself to real numbers, but an extra "use"
18 statement brings full complex support, along with a full set of
19 mathematical functions typically associated with and/or extended to
20 complex numbers.
21
22 If you wonder what complex numbers are, they were invented to be able
23 to solve the following equation:
24
25 x*x = -1
26
27 and by definition, the solution is noted i (engineers use j instead
28 since i usually denotes an intensity, but the name does not matter).
29 The number i is a pure imaginary number.
30
31 The arithmetics with pure imaginary numbers works just like you would
32 expect it with real numbers... you just have to remember that
33
34 i*i = -1
35
36 so you have:
37
38 5i + 7i = i * (5 + 7) = 12i
39 4i - 3i = i * (4 - 3) = i
40 4i * 2i = -8
41 6i / 2i = 3
42 1 / i = -i
43
44 Complex numbers are numbers that have both a real part and an imaginary
45 part, and are usually noted:
46
47 a + bi
48
49 where "a" is the real part and "b" is the imaginary part. The
50 arithmetic with complex numbers is straightforward. You have to keep
51 track of the real and the imaginary parts, but otherwise the rules used
52 for real numbers just apply:
53
54 (4 + 3i) + (5 - 2i) = (4 + 5) + i(3 - 2) = 9 + i
55 (2 + i) * (4 - i) = 2*4 + 4i -2i -i*i = 8 + 2i + 1 = 9 + 2i
56
57 A graphical representation of complex numbers is possible in a plane
58 (also called the complex plane, but it's really a 2D plane). The
59 number
60
61 z = a + bi
62
63 is the point whose coordinates are (a, b). Actually, it would be the
64 vector originating from (0, 0) to (a, b). It follows that the addition
65 of two complex numbers is a vectorial addition.
66
67 Since there is a bijection between a point in the 2D plane and a
68 complex number (i.e. the mapping is unique and reciprocal), a complex
69 number can also be uniquely identified with polar coordinates:
70
71 [rho, theta]
72
73 where "rho" is the distance to the origin, and "theta" the angle
74 between the vector and the x axis. There is a notation for this using
75 the exponential form, which is:
76
77 rho * exp(i * theta)
78
79 where i is the famous imaginary number introduced above. Conversion
80 between this form and the cartesian form "a + bi" is immediate:
81
82 a = rho * cos(theta)
83 b = rho * sin(theta)
84
85 which is also expressed by this formula:
86
87 z = rho * exp(i * theta) = rho * (cos theta + i * sin theta)
88
89 In other words, it's the projection of the vector onto the x and y
90 axes. Mathematicians call rho the norm or modulus and theta the
91 argument of the complex number. The norm of "z" is marked here as
92 abs(z).
93
94 The polar notation (also known as the trigonometric representation) is
95 much more handy for performing multiplications and divisions of complex
96 numbers, whilst the cartesian notation is better suited for additions
97 and subtractions. Real numbers are on the x axis, and therefore y or
98 theta is zero or pi.
99
100 All the common operations that can be performed on a real number have
101 been defined to work on complex numbers as well, and are merely
102 extensions of the operations defined on real numbers. This means they
103 keep their natural meaning when there is no imaginary part, provided
104 the number is within their definition set.
105
106 For instance, the "sqrt" routine which computes the square root of its
107 argument is only defined for non-negative real numbers and yields a
108 non-negative real number (it is an application from R+ to R+). If we
109 allow it to return a complex number, then it can be extended to
110 negative real numbers to become an application from R to C (the set of
111 complex numbers):
112
113 sqrt(x) = x >= 0 ? sqrt(x) : sqrt(-x)*i
114
115 It can also be extended to be an application from C to C, whilst its
116 restriction to R behaves as defined above by using the following
117 definition:
118
119 sqrt(z = [r,t]) = sqrt(r) * exp(i * t/2)
120
121 Indeed, a negative real number can be noted "[x,pi]" (the modulus x is
122 always non-negative, so "[x,pi]" is really "-x", a negative number) and
123 the above definition states that
124
125 sqrt([x,pi]) = sqrt(x) * exp(i*pi/2) = [sqrt(x),pi/2] = sqrt(x)*i
126
127 which is exactly what we had defined for negative real numbers above.
128 The "sqrt" returns only one of the solutions: if you want the both, use
129 the "root" function.
130
131 All the common mathematical functions defined on real numbers that are
132 extended to complex numbers share that same property of working as
133 usual when the imaginary part is zero (otherwise, it would not be
134 called an extension, would it?).
135
136 A new operation possible on a complex number that is the identity for
137 real numbers is called the conjugate, and is noted with a horizontal
138 bar above the number, or "~z" here.
139
140 z = a + bi
141 ~z = a - bi
142
143 Simple... Now look:
144
145 z * ~z = (a + bi) * (a - bi) = a*a + b*b
146
147 We saw that the norm of "z" was noted abs(z) and was defined as the
148 distance to the origin, also known as:
149
150 rho = abs(z) = sqrt(a*a + b*b)
151
152 so
153
154 z * ~z = abs(z) ** 2
155
156 If z is a pure real number (i.e. "b == 0"), then the above yields:
157
158 a * a = abs(a) ** 2
159
160 which is true ("abs" has the regular meaning for real number, i.e.
161 stands for the absolute value). This example explains why the norm of
162 "z" is noted abs(z): it extends the "abs" function to complex numbers,
163 yet is the regular "abs" we know when the complex number actually has
164 no imaginary part... This justifies a posteriori our use of the "abs"
165 notation for the norm.
166
168 Given the following notations:
169
170 z1 = a + bi = r1 * exp(i * t1)
171 z2 = c + di = r2 * exp(i * t2)
172 z = <any complex or real number>
173
174 the following (overloaded) operations are supported on complex numbers:
175
176 z1 + z2 = (a + c) + i(b + d)
177 z1 - z2 = (a - c) + i(b - d)
178 z1 * z2 = (r1 * r2) * exp(i * (t1 + t2))
179 z1 / z2 = (r1 / r2) * exp(i * (t1 - t2))
180 z1 ** z2 = exp(z2 * log z1)
181 ~z = a - bi
182 abs(z) = r1 = sqrt(a*a + b*b)
183 sqrt(z) = sqrt(r1) * exp(i * t/2)
184 exp(z) = exp(a) * exp(i * b)
185 log(z) = log(r1) + i*t
186 sin(z) = 1/2i (exp(i * z1) - exp(-i * z))
187 cos(z) = 1/2 (exp(i * z1) + exp(-i * z))
188 atan2(y, x) = atan(y / x) # Minding the right quadrant, note the order.
189
190 The definition used for complex arguments of atan2() is
191
192 -i log((x + iy)/sqrt(x*x+y*y))
193
194 Note that atan2(0, 0) is not well-defined.
195
196 The following extra operations are supported on both real and complex
197 numbers:
198
199 Re(z) = a
200 Im(z) = b
201 arg(z) = t
202 abs(z) = r
203
204 cbrt(z) = z ** (1/3)
205 log10(z) = log(z) / log(10)
206 logn(z, n) = log(z) / log(n)
207
208 tan(z) = sin(z) / cos(z)
209
210 csc(z) = 1 / sin(z)
211 sec(z) = 1 / cos(z)
212 cot(z) = 1 / tan(z)
213
214 asin(z) = -i * log(i*z + sqrt(1-z*z))
215 acos(z) = -i * log(z + i*sqrt(1-z*z))
216 atan(z) = i/2 * log((i+z) / (i-z))
217
218 acsc(z) = asin(1 / z)
219 asec(z) = acos(1 / z)
220 acot(z) = atan(1 / z) = -i/2 * log((i+z) / (z-i))
221
222 sinh(z) = 1/2 (exp(z) - exp(-z))
223 cosh(z) = 1/2 (exp(z) + exp(-z))
224 tanh(z) = sinh(z) / cosh(z) = (exp(z) - exp(-z)) / (exp(z) + exp(-z))
225
226 csch(z) = 1 / sinh(z)
227 sech(z) = 1 / cosh(z)
228 coth(z) = 1 / tanh(z)
229
230 asinh(z) = log(z + sqrt(z*z+1))
231 acosh(z) = log(z + sqrt(z*z-1))
232 atanh(z) = 1/2 * log((1+z) / (1-z))
233
234 acsch(z) = asinh(1 / z)
235 asech(z) = acosh(1 / z)
236 acoth(z) = atanh(1 / z) = 1/2 * log((1+z) / (z-1))
237
238 arg, abs, log, csc, cot, acsc, acot, csch, coth, acosech, acotanh, have
239 aliases rho, theta, ln, cosec, cotan, acosec, acotan, cosech, cotanh,
240 acosech, acotanh, respectively. "Re", "Im", "arg", "abs", "rho", and
241 "theta" can be used also as mutators. The "cbrt" returns only one of
242 the solutions: if you want all three, use the "root" function.
243
244 The root function is available to compute all the n roots of some
245 complex, where n is a strictly positive integer. There are exactly n
246 such roots, returned as a list. Getting the number mathematicians call
247 "j" such that:
248
249 1 + j + j*j = 0;
250
251 is a simple matter of writing:
252
253 $j = ((root(1, 3))[1];
254
255 The kth root for "z = [r,t]" is given by:
256
257 (root(z, n))[k] = r**(1/n) * exp(i * (t + 2*k*pi)/n)
258
259 You can return the kth root directly by "root(z, n, k)", indexing
260 starting from zero and ending at n - 1.
261
262 The spaceship numeric comparison operator, <=>, is also defined. In
263 order to ensure its restriction to real numbers is conform to what you
264 would expect, the comparison is run on the real part of the complex
265 number first, and imaginary parts are compared only when the real parts
266 match.
267
269 To create a complex number, use either:
270
271 $z = Math::Complex->make(3, 4);
272 $z = cplx(3, 4);
273
274 if you know the cartesian form of the number, or
275
276 $z = 3 + 4*i;
277
278 if you like. To create a number using the polar form, use either:
279
280 $z = Math::Complex->emake(5, pi/3);
281 $x = cplxe(5, pi/3);
282
283 instead. The first argument is the modulus, the second is the angle (in
284 radians, the full circle is 2*pi). (Mnemonic: "e" is used as a
285 notation for complex numbers in the polar form).
286
287 It is possible to write:
288
289 $x = cplxe(-3, pi/4);
290
291 but that will be silently converted into "[3,-3pi/4]", since the
292 modulus must be non-negative (it represents the distance to the origin
293 in the complex plane).
294
295 It is also possible to have a complex number as either argument of the
296 "make", "emake", "cplx", and "cplxe": the appropriate component of the
297 argument will be used.
298
299 $z1 = cplx(-2, 1);
300 $z2 = cplx($z1, 4);
301
302 The "new", "make", "emake", "cplx", and "cplxe" will also understand a
303 single (string) argument of the forms
304
305 2-3i
306 -3i
307 [2,3]
308 [2,-3pi/4]
309 [2]
310
311 in which case the appropriate cartesian and exponential components will
312 be parsed from the string and used to create new complex numbers. The
313 imaginary component and the theta, respectively, will default to zero.
314
315 The "new", "make", "emake", "cplx", and "cplxe" will also understand
316 the case of no arguments: this means plain zero or (0, 0).
317
319 When printed, a complex number is usually shown under its cartesian
320 style a+bi, but there are legitimate cases where the polar style [r,t]
321 is more appropriate. The process of converting the complex number into
322 a string that can be displayed is known as stringification.
323
324 By calling the class method "Math::Complex::display_format" and
325 supplying either "polar" or "cartesian" as an argument, you override
326 the default display style, which is "cartesian". Not supplying any
327 argument returns the current settings.
328
329 This default can be overridden on a per-number basis by calling the
330 "display_format" method instead. As before, not supplying any argument
331 returns the current display style for this number. Otherwise whatever
332 you specify will be the new display style for this particular number.
333
334 For instance:
335
336 use Math::Complex;
337
338 Math::Complex::display_format('polar');
339 $j = (root(1, 3))[1];
340 print "j = $j\n"; # Prints "j = [1,2pi/3]"
341 $j->display_format('cartesian');
342 print "j = $j\n"; # Prints "j = -0.5+0.866025403784439i"
343
344 The polar style attempts to emphasize arguments like k*pi/n (where n is
345 a positive integer and k an integer within [-9, +9]), this is called
346 polar pretty-printing.
347
348 For the reverse of stringifying, see the "make" and "emake".
349
350 CHANGED IN PERL 5.6
351 The "display_format" class method and the corresponding
352 "display_format" object method can now be called using a parameter hash
353 instead of just a one parameter.
354
355 The old display format style, which can have values "cartesian" or
356 "polar", can be changed using the "style" parameter.
357
358 $j->display_format(style => "polar");
359
360 The one parameter calling convention also still works.
361
362 $j->display_format("polar");
363
364 There are two new display parameters.
365
366 The first one is "format", which is a sprintf()-style format string to
367 be used for both numeric parts of the complex number(s). The is
368 somewhat system-dependent but most often it corresponds to "%.15g".
369 You can revert to the default by setting the "format" to "undef".
370
371 # the $j from the above example
372
373 $j->display_format('format' => '%.5f');
374 print "j = $j\n"; # Prints "j = -0.50000+0.86603i"
375 $j->display_format('format' => undef);
376 print "j = $j\n"; # Prints "j = -0.5+0.86603i"
377
378 Notice that this affects also the return values of the "display_format"
379 methods: in list context the whole parameter hash will be returned, as
380 opposed to only the style parameter value. This is a potential
381 incompatibility with earlier versions if you have been calling the
382 "display_format" method in list context.
383
384 The second new display parameter is "polar_pretty_print", which can be
385 set to true or false, the default being true. See the previous section
386 for what this means.
387
389 Thanks to overloading, the handling of arithmetics with complex numbers
390 is simple and almost transparent.
391
392 Here are some examples:
393
394 use Math::Complex;
395
396 $j = cplxe(1, 2*pi/3); # $j ** 3 == 1
397 print "j = $j, j**3 = ", $j ** 3, "\n";
398 print "1 + j + j**2 = ", 1 + $j + $j**2, "\n";
399
400 $z = -16 + 0*i; # Force it to be a complex
401 print "sqrt($z) = ", sqrt($z), "\n";
402
403 $k = exp(i * 2*pi/3);
404 print "$j - $k = ", $j - $k, "\n";
405
406 $z->Re(3); # Re, Im, arg, abs,
407 $j->arg(2); # (the last two aka rho, theta)
408 # can be used also as mutators.
409
411 PI
412 The constant "pi" and some handy multiples of it (pi2, pi4, and pip2
413 (pi/2) and pip4 (pi/4)) are also available if separately exported:
414
415 use Math::Complex ':pi';
416 $third_of_circle = pi2 / 3;
417
418 Inf
419 The floating point infinity can be exported as a subroutine Inf():
420
421 use Math::Complex qw(Inf sinh);
422 my $AlsoInf = Inf() + 42;
423 my $AnotherInf = sinh(1e42);
424 print "$AlsoInf is $AnotherInf\n" if $AlsoInf == $AnotherInf;
425
426 Note that the stringified form of infinity varies between platforms: it
427 can be for example any of
428
429 inf
430 infinity
431 INF
432 1.#INF
433
434 or it can be something else.
435
436 Also note that in some platforms trying to use the infinity in
437 arithmetic operations may result in Perl crashing because using an
438 infinity causes SIGFPE or its moral equivalent to be sent. The way to
439 ignore this is
440
441 local $SIG{FPE} = sub { };
442
444 The division (/) and the following functions
445
446 log ln log10 logn
447 tan sec csc cot
448 atan asec acsc acot
449 tanh sech csch coth
450 atanh asech acsch acoth
451
452 cannot be computed for all arguments because that would mean dividing
453 by zero or taking logarithm of zero. These situations cause fatal
454 runtime errors looking like this
455
456 cot(0): Division by zero.
457 (Because in the definition of cot(0), the divisor sin(0) is 0)
458 Died at ...
459
460 or
461
462 atanh(-1): Logarithm of zero.
463 Died at...
464
465 For the "csc", "cot", "asec", "acsc", "acot", "csch", "coth", "asech",
466 "acsch", the argument cannot be 0 (zero). For the logarithmic
467 functions and the "atanh", "acoth", the argument cannot be 1 (one).
468 For the "atanh", "acoth", the argument cannot be "-1" (minus one). For
469 the "atan", "acot", the argument cannot be "i" (the imaginary unit).
470 For the "atan", "acoth", the argument cannot be "-i" (the negative
471 imaginary unit). For the "tan", "sec", "tanh", the argument cannot be
472 pi/2 + k * pi, where k is any integer. atan2(0, 0) is undefined, and
473 if the complex arguments are used for atan2(), a division by zero will
474 happen if z1**2+z2**2 == 0.
475
476 Note that because we are operating on approximations of real numbers,
477 these errors can happen when merely `too close' to the singularities
478 listed above.
479
481 The "make" and "emake" accept both real and complex arguments. When
482 they cannot recognize the arguments they will die with error messages
483 like the following
484
485 Math::Complex::make: Cannot take real part of ...
486 Math::Complex::make: Cannot take real part of ...
487 Math::Complex::emake: Cannot take rho of ...
488 Math::Complex::emake: Cannot take theta of ...
489
491 Saying "use Math::Complex;" exports many mathematical routines in the
492 caller environment and even overrides some ("sqrt", "log", "atan2").
493 This is construed as a feature by the Authors, actually... ;-)
494
495 All routines expect to be given real or complex numbers. Don't attempt
496 to use BigFloat, since Perl has currently no rule to disambiguate a '+'
497 operation (for instance) between two overloaded entities.
498
499 In Cray UNICOS there is some strange numerical instability that results
500 in root(), cos(), sin(), cosh(), sinh(), losing accuracy fast. Beware.
501 The bug may be in UNICOS math libs, in UNICOS C compiler, in
502 Math::Complex. Whatever it is, it does not manifest itself anywhere
503 else where Perl runs.
504
506 Math::Trig
507
509 Daniel S. Lewart <lewart!at!uiuc.edu>, Jarkko Hietaniemi
510 <jhi!at!iki.fi>, Raphael Manfredi <Raphael_Manfredi!at!pobox.com>,
511 Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
512
514 This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
515 under the same terms as Perl itself.
516
517
518
519perl v5.28.2 2018-11-01 Math::Complex(3pm)