1PERLSYN(1)             Perl Programmers Reference Guide             PERLSYN(1)
2
3
4

NAME

6       perlsyn - Perl syntax
7

DESCRIPTION

9       A Perl program consists of a sequence of declarations and statements
10       which run from the top to the bottom.  Loops, subroutines, and other
11       control structures allow you to jump around within the code.
12
13       Perl is a free-form language: you can format and indent it however you
14       like.  Whitespace serves mostly to separate tokens, unlike languages
15       like Python where it is an important part of the syntax, or Fortran
16       where it is immaterial.
17
18       Many of Perl's syntactic elements are optional.  Rather than requiring
19       you to put parentheses around every function call and declare every
20       variable, you can often leave such explicit elements off and Perl will
21       figure out what you meant.  This is known as Do What I Mean,
22       abbreviated DWIM.  It allows programmers to be lazy and to code in a
23       style with which they are comfortable.
24
25       Perl borrows syntax and concepts from many languages: awk, sed, C,
26       Bourne Shell, Smalltalk, Lisp and even English.  Other languages have
27       borrowed syntax from Perl, particularly its regular expression
28       extensions.  So if you have programmed in another language you will see
29       familiar pieces in Perl.  They often work the same, but see perltrap
30       for information about how they differ.
31
32   Declarations
33       The only things you need to declare in Perl are report formats and
34       subroutines (and sometimes not even subroutines).  A scalar variable
35       holds the undefined value ("undef") until it has been assigned a
36       defined value, which is anything other than "undef".  When used as a
37       number, "undef" is treated as 0; when used as a string, it is treated
38       as the empty string, ""; and when used as a reference that isn't being
39       assigned to, it is treated as an error.  If you enable warnings, you'll
40       be notified of an uninitialized value whenever you treat "undef" as a
41       string or a number.  Well, usually.  Boolean contexts, such as:
42
43           if ($a) {}
44
45       are exempt from warnings (because they care about truth rather than
46       definedness).  Operators such as "++", "--", "+=", "-=", and ".=", that
47       operate on undefined variables such as:
48
49           undef $a;
50           $a++;
51
52       are also always exempt from such warnings.
53
54       A declaration can be put anywhere a statement can, but has no effect on
55       the execution of the primary sequence of statements: declarations all
56       take effect at compile time.  All declarations are typically put at the
57       beginning or the end of the script.  However, if you're using
58       lexically-scoped private variables created with "my()", "state()", or
59       "our()", you'll have to make sure your format or subroutine definition
60       is within the same block scope as the my if you expect to be able to
61       access those private variables.
62
63       Declaring a subroutine allows a subroutine name to be used as if it
64       were a list operator from that point forward in the program.  You can
65       declare a subroutine without defining it by saying "sub name", thus:
66
67           sub myname;
68           $me = myname $0             or die "can't get myname";
69
70       A bare declaration like that declares the function to be a list
71       operator, not a unary operator, so you have to be careful to use
72       parentheses (or "or" instead of "||".)  The "||" operator binds too
73       tightly to use after list operators; it becomes part of the last
74       element.  You can always use parentheses around the list operators
75       arguments to turn the list operator back into something that behaves
76       more like a function call.  Alternatively, you can use the prototype
77       "($)" to turn the subroutine into a unary operator:
78
79         sub myname ($);
80         $me = myname $0             || die "can't get myname";
81
82       That now parses as you'd expect, but you still ought to get in the
83       habit of using parentheses in that situation.  For more on prototypes,
84       see perlsub.
85
86       Subroutines declarations can also be loaded up with the "require"
87       statement or both loaded and imported into your namespace with a "use"
88       statement.  See perlmod for details on this.
89
90       A statement sequence may contain declarations of lexically-scoped
91       variables, but apart from declaring a variable name, the declaration
92       acts like an ordinary statement, and is elaborated within the sequence
93       of statements as if it were an ordinary statement.  That means it
94       actually has both compile-time and run-time effects.
95
96   Comments
97       Text from a "#" character until the end of the line is a comment, and
98       is ignored.  Exceptions include "#" inside a string or regular
99       expression.
100
101   Simple Statements
102       The only kind of simple statement is an expression evaluated for its
103       side-effects.  Every simple statement must be terminated with a
104       semicolon, unless it is the final statement in a block, in which case
105       the semicolon is optional.  But put the semicolon in anyway if the
106       block takes up more than one line, because you may eventually add
107       another line.  Note that there are operators like "eval {}", "sub {}",
108       and "do {}" that look like compound statements, but aren't--they're
109       just TERMs in an expression--and thus need an explicit termination when
110       used as the last item in a statement.
111
112   Statement Modifiers
113       Any simple statement may optionally be followed by a SINGLE modifier,
114       just before the terminating semicolon (or block ending).  The possible
115       modifiers are:
116
117           if EXPR
118           unless EXPR
119           while EXPR
120           until EXPR
121           for LIST
122           foreach LIST
123           when EXPR
124
125       The "EXPR" following the modifier is referred to as the "condition".
126       Its truth or falsehood determines how the modifier will behave.
127
128       "if" executes the statement once if and only if the condition is true.
129       "unless" is the opposite, it executes the statement unless the
130       condition is true (that is, if the condition is false).  See "Scalar
131       values" in perldata for definitions of true and false.
132
133           print "Basset hounds got long ears" if length $ear >= 10;
134           go_outside() and play() unless $is_raining;
135
136       The "for(each)" modifier is an iterator: it executes the statement once
137       for each item in the LIST (with $_ aliased to each item in turn).
138       There is no syntax to specify a C-style for loop or a lexically scoped
139       iteration variable in this form.
140
141           print "Hello $_!\n" for qw(world Dolly nurse);
142
143       "while" repeats the statement while the condition is true.  Postfix
144       "while" has the same magic treatment of some kinds of condition that
145       prefix "while" has.  "until" does the opposite, it repeats the
146       statement until the condition is true (or while the condition is
147       false):
148
149           # Both of these count from 0 to 10.
150           print $i++ while $i <= 10;
151           print $j++ until $j >  10;
152
153       The "while" and "until" modifiers have the usual ""while" loop"
154       semantics (conditional evaluated first), except when applied to a
155       "do"-BLOCK (or to the Perl4 "do"-SUBROUTINE statement), in which case
156       the block executes once before the conditional is evaluated.
157
158       This is so that you can write loops like:
159
160           do {
161               $line = <STDIN>;
162               ...
163           } until !defined($line) || $line eq ".\n"
164
165       See "do" in perlfunc.  Note also that the loop control statements
166       described later will NOT work in this construct, because modifiers
167       don't take loop labels.  Sorry.  You can always put another block
168       inside of it (for "next"/"redo") or around it (for "last") to do that
169       sort of thing.
170
171       For "next" or "redo", just double the braces:
172
173           do {{
174               next if $x == $y;
175               # do something here
176           }} until $x++ > $z;
177
178       For "last", you have to be more elaborate and put braces around it:
179
180           {
181               do {
182                   last if $x == $y**2;
183                   # do something here
184               } while $x++ <= $z;
185           }
186
187       If you need both "next" and "last", you have to do both and also use a
188       loop label:
189
190           LOOP: {
191               do {{
192                   next if $x == $y;
193                   last LOOP if $x == $y**2;
194                   # do something here
195               }} until $x++ > $z;
196           }
197
198       NOTE: The behaviour of a "my", "state", or "our" modified with a
199       statement modifier conditional or loop construct (for example, "my $x
200       if ...") is undefined.  The value of the "my" variable may be "undef",
201       any previously assigned value, or possibly anything else.  Don't rely
202       on it.  Future versions of perl might do something different from the
203       version of perl you try it out on.  Here be dragons.
204
205       The "when" modifier is an experimental feature that first appeared in
206       Perl 5.14.  To use it, you should include a "use v5.14" declaration.
207       (Technically, it requires only the "switch" feature, but that aspect of
208       it was not available before 5.14.)  Operative only from within a
209       "foreach" loop or a "given" block, it executes the statement only if
210       the smartmatch "$_ ~~ EXPR" is true.  If the statement executes, it is
211       followed by a "next" from inside a "foreach" and "break" from inside a
212       "given".
213
214       Under the current implementation, the "foreach" loop can be anywhere
215       within the "when" modifier's dynamic scope, but must be within the
216       "given" block's lexical scope.  This restriction may be relaxed in a
217       future release.  See "Switch Statements" below.
218
219   Compound Statements
220       In Perl, a sequence of statements that defines a scope is called a
221       block.  Sometimes a block is delimited by the file containing it (in
222       the case of a required file, or the program as a whole), and sometimes
223       a block is delimited by the extent of a string (in the case of an
224       eval).
225
226       But generally, a block is delimited by curly brackets, also known as
227       braces.  We will call this syntactic construct a BLOCK.  Because
228       enclosing braces are also the syntax for hash reference constructor
229       expressions (see perlref), you may occasionally need to disambiguate by
230       placing a ";" immediately after an opening brace so that Perl realises
231       the brace is the start of a block.  You will more frequently need to
232       disambiguate the other way, by placing a "+" immediately before an
233       opening brace to force it to be interpreted as a hash reference
234       constructor expression.  It is considered good style to use these
235       disambiguating mechanisms liberally, not only when Perl would otherwise
236       guess incorrectly.
237
238       The following compound statements may be used to control flow:
239
240           if (EXPR) BLOCK
241           if (EXPR) BLOCK else BLOCK
242           if (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ...
243           if (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ... else BLOCK
244
245           unless (EXPR) BLOCK
246           unless (EXPR) BLOCK else BLOCK
247           unless (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ...
248           unless (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ... else BLOCK
249
250           given (EXPR) BLOCK
251
252           LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK
253           LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK continue BLOCK
254
255           LABEL until (EXPR) BLOCK
256           LABEL until (EXPR) BLOCK continue BLOCK
257
258           LABEL for (EXPR; EXPR; EXPR) BLOCK
259           LABEL for VAR (LIST) BLOCK
260           LABEL for VAR (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK
261
262           LABEL foreach (EXPR; EXPR; EXPR) BLOCK
263           LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK
264           LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK
265
266           LABEL BLOCK
267           LABEL BLOCK continue BLOCK
268
269           PHASE BLOCK
270
271       The experimental "given" statement is not automatically enabled; see
272       "Switch Statements" below for how to do so, and the attendant caveats.
273
274       Unlike in C and Pascal, in Perl these are all defined in terms of
275       BLOCKs, not statements.  This means that the curly brackets are
276       required--no dangling statements allowed.  If you want to write
277       conditionals without curly brackets, there are several other ways to do
278       it.  The following all do the same thing:
279
280           if (!open(FOO)) { die "Can't open $FOO: $!" }
281           die "Can't open $FOO: $!" unless open(FOO);
282           open(FOO)  || die "Can't open $FOO: $!";
283           open(FOO) ? () : die "Can't open $FOO: $!";
284               # a bit exotic, that last one
285
286       The "if" statement is straightforward.  Because BLOCKs are always
287       bounded by curly brackets, there is never any ambiguity about which
288       "if" an "else" goes with.  If you use "unless" in place of "if", the
289       sense of the test is reversed.  Like "if", "unless" can be followed by
290       "else".  "unless" can even be followed by one or more "elsif"
291       statements, though you may want to think twice before using that
292       particular language construct, as everyone reading your code will have
293       to think at least twice before they can understand what's going on.
294
295       The "while" statement executes the block as long as the expression is
296       true.  The "until" statement executes the block as long as the
297       expression is false.  The LABEL is optional, and if present, consists
298       of an identifier followed by a colon.  The LABEL identifies the loop
299       for the loop control statements "next", "last", and "redo".  If the
300       LABEL is omitted, the loop control statement refers to the innermost
301       enclosing loop.  This may include dynamically looking back your call-
302       stack at run time to find the LABEL.  Such desperate behavior triggers
303       a warning if you use the "use warnings" pragma or the -w flag.
304
305       If the condition expression of a "while" statement is based on any of a
306       group of iterative expression types then it gets some magic treatment.
307       The affected iterative expression types are "readline", the
308       "<FILEHANDLE>" input operator, "readdir", "glob", the "<PATTERN>"
309       globbing operator, and "each".  If the condition expression is one of
310       these expression types, then the value yielded by the iterative
311       operator will be implicitly assigned to $_.  If the condition
312       expression is one of these expression types or an explicit assignment
313       of one of them to a scalar, then the condition actually tests for
314       definedness of the expression's value, not for its regular truth value.
315
316       If there is a "continue" BLOCK, it is always executed just before the
317       conditional is about to be evaluated again.  Thus it can be used to
318       increment a loop variable, even when the loop has been continued via
319       the "next" statement.
320
321       When a block is preceded by a compilation phase keyword such as
322       "BEGIN", "END", "INIT", "CHECK", or "UNITCHECK", then the block will
323       run only during the corresponding phase of execution.  See perlmod for
324       more details.
325
326       Extension modules can also hook into the Perl parser to define new
327       kinds of compound statements.  These are introduced by a keyword which
328       the extension recognizes, and the syntax following the keyword is
329       defined entirely by the extension.  If you are an implementor, see
330       "PL_keyword_plugin" in perlapi for the mechanism.  If you are using
331       such a module, see the module's documentation for details of the syntax
332       that it defines.
333
334   Loop Control
335       The "next" command starts the next iteration of the loop:
336
337           LINE: while (<STDIN>) {
338               next LINE if /^#/;      # discard comments
339               ...
340           }
341
342       The "last" command immediately exits the loop in question.  The
343       "continue" block, if any, is not executed:
344
345           LINE: while (<STDIN>) {
346               last LINE if /^$/;      # exit when done with header
347               ...
348           }
349
350       The "redo" command restarts the loop block without evaluating the
351       conditional again.  The "continue" block, if any, is not executed.
352       This command is normally used by programs that want to lie to
353       themselves about what was just input.
354
355       For example, when processing a file like /etc/termcap.  If your input
356       lines might end in backslashes to indicate continuation, you want to
357       skip ahead and get the next record.
358
359           while (<>) {
360               chomp;
361               if (s/\\$//) {
362                   $_ .= <>;
363                   redo unless eof();
364               }
365               # now process $_
366           }
367
368       which is Perl shorthand for the more explicitly written version:
369
370           LINE: while (defined($line = <ARGV>)) {
371               chomp($line);
372               if ($line =~ s/\\$//) {
373                   $line .= <ARGV>;
374                   redo LINE unless eof(); # not eof(ARGV)!
375               }
376               # now process $line
377           }
378
379       Note that if there were a "continue" block on the above code, it would
380       get executed only on lines discarded by the regex (since redo skips the
381       continue block).  A continue block is often used to reset line counters
382       or "m?pat?" one-time matches:
383
384           # inspired by :1,$g/fred/s//WILMA/
385           while (<>) {
386               m?(fred)?    && s//WILMA $1 WILMA/;
387               m?(barney)?  && s//BETTY $1 BETTY/;
388               m?(homer)?   && s//MARGE $1 MARGE/;
389           } continue {
390               print "$ARGV $.: $_";
391               close ARGV  if eof;             # reset $.
392               reset       if eof;             # reset ?pat?
393           }
394
395       If the word "while" is replaced by the word "until", the sense of the
396       test is reversed, but the conditional is still tested before the first
397       iteration.
398
399       Loop control statements don't work in an "if" or "unless", since they
400       aren't loops.  You can double the braces to make them such, though.
401
402           if (/pattern/) {{
403               last if /fred/;
404               next if /barney/; # same effect as "last",
405                                 # but doesn't document as well
406               # do something here
407           }}
408
409       This is caused by the fact that a block by itself acts as a loop that
410       executes once, see "Basic BLOCKs".
411
412       The form "while/if BLOCK BLOCK", available in Perl 4, is no longer
413       available.   Replace any occurrence of "if BLOCK" by "if (do BLOCK)".
414
415   For Loops
416       Perl's C-style "for" loop works like the corresponding "while" loop;
417       that means that this:
418
419           for ($i = 1; $i < 10; $i++) {
420               ...
421           }
422
423       is the same as this:
424
425           $i = 1;
426           while ($i < 10) {
427               ...
428           } continue {
429               $i++;
430           }
431
432       There is one minor difference: if variables are declared with "my" in
433       the initialization section of the "for", the lexical scope of those
434       variables is exactly the "for" loop (the body of the loop and the
435       control sections).
436
437       As a special case, if the test in the "for" loop (or the corresponding
438       "while" loop) is empty, it is treated as true.  That is, both
439
440           for (;;) {
441               ...
442           }
443
444       and
445
446           while () {
447               ...
448           }
449
450       are treated as infinite loops.
451
452       Besides the normal array index looping, "for" can lend itself to many
453       other interesting applications.  Here's one that avoids the problem you
454       get into if you explicitly test for end-of-file on an interactive file
455       descriptor causing your program to appear to hang.
456
457           $on_a_tty = -t STDIN && -t STDOUT;
458           sub prompt { print "yes? " if $on_a_tty }
459           for ( prompt(); <STDIN>; prompt() ) {
460               # do something
461           }
462
463       The condition expression of a "for" loop gets the same magic treatment
464       of "readline" et al that the condition expression of a "while" loop
465       gets.
466
467   Foreach Loops
468       The "foreach" loop iterates over a normal list value and sets the
469       scalar variable VAR to be each element of the list in turn.  If the
470       variable is preceded with the keyword "my", then it is lexically
471       scoped, and is therefore visible only within the loop.  Otherwise, the
472       variable is implicitly local to the loop and regains its former value
473       upon exiting the loop.  If the variable was previously declared with
474       "my", it uses that variable instead of the global one, but it's still
475       localized to the loop.  This implicit localization occurs only in a
476       "foreach" loop.
477
478       The "foreach" keyword is actually a synonym for the "for" keyword, so
479       you can use either.  If VAR is omitted, $_ is set to each value.
480
481       If any element of LIST is an lvalue, you can modify it by modifying VAR
482       inside the loop.  Conversely, if any element of LIST is NOT an lvalue,
483       any attempt to modify that element will fail.  In other words, the
484       "foreach" loop index variable is an implicit alias for each item in the
485       list that you're looping over.
486
487       If any part of LIST is an array, "foreach" will get very confused if
488       you add or remove elements within the loop body, for example with
489       "splice".   So don't do that.
490
491       "foreach" probably won't do what you expect if VAR is a tied or other
492       special variable.   Don't do that either.
493
494       As of Perl 5.22, there is an experimental variant of this loop that
495       accepts a variable preceded by a backslash for VAR, in which case the
496       items in the LIST must be references.  The backslashed variable will
497       become an alias to each referenced item in the LIST, which must be of
498       the correct type.  The variable needn't be a scalar in this case, and
499       the backslash may be followed by "my".  To use this form, you must
500       enable the "refaliasing" feature via "use feature".  (See feature.  See
501       also "Assigning to References" in perlref.)
502
503       Examples:
504
505           for (@ary) { s/foo/bar/ }
506
507           for my $elem (@elements) {
508               $elem *= 2;
509           }
510
511           for $count (reverse(1..10), "BOOM") {
512               print $count, "\n";
513               sleep(1);
514           }
515
516           for (1..15) { print "Merry Christmas\n"; }
517
518           foreach $item (split(/:[\\\n:]*/, $ENV{TERMCAP})) {
519               print "Item: $item\n";
520           }
521
522           use feature "refaliasing";
523           no warnings "experimental::refaliasing";
524           foreach \my %hash (@array_of_hash_references) {
525               # do something which each %hash
526           }
527
528       Here's how a C programmer might code up a particular algorithm in Perl:
529
530           for (my $i = 0; $i < @ary1; $i++) {
531               for (my $j = 0; $j < @ary2; $j++) {
532                   if ($ary1[$i] > $ary2[$j]) {
533                       last; # can't go to outer :-(
534                   }
535                   $ary1[$i] += $ary2[$j];
536               }
537               # this is where that last takes me
538           }
539
540       Whereas here's how a Perl programmer more comfortable with the idiom
541       might do it:
542
543           OUTER: for my $wid (@ary1) {
544           INNER:   for my $jet (@ary2) {
545                       next OUTER if $wid > $jet;
546                       $wid += $jet;
547                    }
548                 }
549
550       See how much easier this is?  It's cleaner, safer, and faster.  It's
551       cleaner because it's less noisy.  It's safer because if code gets added
552       between the inner and outer loops later on, the new code won't be
553       accidentally executed.  The "next" explicitly iterates the other loop
554       rather than merely terminating the inner one.  And it's faster because
555       Perl executes a "foreach" statement more rapidly than it would the
556       equivalent C-style "for" loop.
557
558       Perceptive Perl hackers may have noticed that a "for" loop has a return
559       value, and that this value can be captured by wrapping the loop in a
560       "do" block.  The reward for this discovery is this cautionary advice:
561       The return value of a "for" loop is unspecified and may change without
562       notice.  Do not rely on it.
563
564   Basic BLOCKs
565       A BLOCK by itself (labeled or not) is semantically equivalent to a loop
566       that executes once.  Thus you can use any of the loop control
567       statements in it to leave or restart the block.  (Note that this is NOT
568       true in "eval{}", "sub{}", or contrary to popular belief "do{}" blocks,
569       which do NOT count as loops.)  The "continue" block is optional.
570
571       The BLOCK construct can be used to emulate case structures.
572
573           SWITCH: {
574               if (/^abc/) { $abc = 1; last SWITCH; }
575               if (/^def/) { $def = 1; last SWITCH; }
576               if (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1; last SWITCH; }
577               $nothing = 1;
578           }
579
580       You'll also find that "foreach" loop used to create a topicalizer and a
581       switch:
582
583           SWITCH:
584           for ($var) {
585               if (/^abc/) { $abc = 1; last SWITCH; }
586               if (/^def/) { $def = 1; last SWITCH; }
587               if (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1; last SWITCH; }
588               $nothing = 1;
589           }
590
591       Such constructs are quite frequently used, both because older versions
592       of Perl had no official "switch" statement, and also because the new
593       version described immediately below remains experimental and can
594       sometimes be confusing.
595
596   Switch Statements
597       Starting from Perl 5.10.1 (well, 5.10.0, but it didn't work right), you
598       can say
599
600           use feature "switch";
601
602       to enable an experimental switch feature.  This is loosely based on an
603       old version of a Raku proposal, but it no longer resembles the Raku
604       construct.   You also get the switch feature whenever you declare that
605       your code prefers to run under a version of Perl that is 5.10 or later.
606       For example:
607
608           use v5.14;
609
610       Under the "switch" feature, Perl gains the experimental keywords
611       "given", "when", "default", "continue", and "break".  Starting from
612       Perl 5.16, one can prefix the switch keywords with "CORE::" to access
613       the feature without a "use feature" statement.  The keywords "given"
614       and "when" are analogous to "switch" and "case" in other languages --
615       though "continue" is not -- so the code in the previous section could
616       be rewritten as
617
618           use v5.10.1;
619           for ($var) {
620               when (/^abc/) { $abc = 1 }
621               when (/^def/) { $def = 1 }
622               when (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1 }
623               default       { $nothing = 1 }
624           }
625
626       The "foreach" is the non-experimental way to set a topicalizer.  If you
627       wish to use the highly experimental "given", that could be written like
628       this:
629
630           use v5.10.1;
631           given ($var) {
632               when (/^abc/) { $abc = 1 }
633               when (/^def/) { $def = 1 }
634               when (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1 }
635               default       { $nothing = 1 }
636           }
637
638       As of 5.14, that can also be written this way:
639
640           use v5.14;
641           for ($var) {
642               $abc = 1 when /^abc/;
643               $def = 1 when /^def/;
644               $xyz = 1 when /^xyz/;
645               default { $nothing = 1 }
646           }
647
648       Or if you don't care to play it safe, like this:
649
650           use v5.14;
651           given ($var) {
652               $abc = 1 when /^abc/;
653               $def = 1 when /^def/;
654               $xyz = 1 when /^xyz/;
655               default { $nothing = 1 }
656           }
657
658       The arguments to "given" and "when" are in scalar context, and "given"
659       assigns the $_ variable its topic value.
660
661       Exactly what the EXPR argument to "when" does is hard to describe
662       precisely, but in general, it tries to guess what you want done.
663       Sometimes it is interpreted as "$_ ~~ EXPR", and sometimes it is not.
664       It also behaves differently when lexically enclosed by a "given" block
665       than it does when dynamically enclosed by a "foreach" loop.  The rules
666       are far too difficult to understand to be described here.  See
667       "Experimental Details on given and when" later on.
668
669       Due to an unfortunate bug in how "given" was implemented between Perl
670       5.10 and 5.16, under those implementations the version of $_ governed
671       by "given" is merely a lexically scoped copy of the original, not a
672       dynamically scoped alias to the original, as it would be if it were a
673       "foreach" or under both the original and the current Raku language
674       specification.  This bug was fixed in Perl 5.18 (and lexicalized $_
675       itself was removed in Perl 5.24).
676
677       If your code still needs to run on older versions, stick to "foreach"
678       for your topicalizer and you will be less unhappy.
679
680   Goto
681       Although not for the faint of heart, Perl does support a "goto"
682       statement.  There are three forms: "goto"-LABEL, "goto"-EXPR, and
683       "goto"-&NAME.  A loop's LABEL is not actually a valid target for a
684       "goto"; it's just the name of the loop.
685
686       The "goto"-LABEL form finds the statement labeled with LABEL and
687       resumes execution there.  It may not be used to go into any construct
688       that requires initialization, such as a subroutine or a "foreach" loop.
689       It also can't be used to go into a construct that is optimized away.
690       It can be used to go almost anywhere else within the dynamic scope,
691       including out of subroutines, but it's usually better to use some other
692       construct such as "last" or "die".  The author of Perl has never felt
693       the need to use this form of "goto" (in Perl, that is--C is another
694       matter).
695
696       The "goto"-EXPR form expects a label name, whose scope will be resolved
697       dynamically.  This allows for computed "goto"s per FORTRAN, but isn't
698       necessarily recommended if you're optimizing for maintainability:
699
700           goto(("FOO", "BAR", "GLARCH")[$i]);
701
702       The "goto"-&NAME form is highly magical, and substitutes a call to the
703       named subroutine for the currently running subroutine.  This is used by
704       "AUTOLOAD()" subroutines that wish to load another subroutine and then
705       pretend that the other subroutine had been called in the first place
706       (except that any modifications to @_ in the current subroutine are
707       propagated to the other subroutine.)  After the "goto", not even
708       "caller()" will be able to tell that this routine was called first.
709
710       In almost all cases like this, it's usually a far, far better idea to
711       use the structured control flow mechanisms of "next", "last", or "redo"
712       instead of resorting to a "goto".  For certain applications, the catch
713       and throw pair of "eval{}" and die() for exception processing can also
714       be a prudent approach.
715
716   The Ellipsis Statement
717       Beginning in Perl 5.12, Perl accepts an ellipsis, ""..."", as a
718       placeholder for code that you haven't implemented yet.  When Perl 5.12
719       or later encounters an ellipsis statement, it parses this without
720       error, but if and when you should actually try to execute it, Perl
721       throws an exception with the text "Unimplemented":
722
723           use v5.12;
724           sub unimplemented { ... }
725           eval { unimplemented() };
726           if ($@ =~ /^Unimplemented at /) {
727               say "I found an ellipsis!";
728           }
729
730       You can only use the elliptical statement to stand in for a complete
731       statement.  Syntactically, ""...;"" is a complete statement, but, as
732       with other kinds of semicolon-terminated statement, the semicolon may
733       be omitted if ""..."" appears immediately before a closing brace.
734       These examples show how the ellipsis works:
735
736           use v5.12;
737           { ... }
738           sub foo { ... }
739           ...;
740           eval { ... };
741           sub somemeth {
742               my $self = shift;
743               ...;
744           }
745           $x = do {
746               my $n;
747               ...;
748               say "Hurrah!";
749               $n;
750           };
751
752       The elliptical statement cannot stand in for an expression that is part
753       of a larger statement.  These examples of attempts to use an ellipsis
754       are syntax errors:
755
756           use v5.12;
757
758           print ...;
759           open(my $fh, ">", "/dev/passwd") or ...;
760           if ($condition && ... ) { say "Howdy" };
761           ... if $a > $b;
762           say "Cromulent" if ...;
763           $flub = 5 + ...;
764
765       There are some cases where Perl can't immediately tell the difference
766       between an expression and a statement.  For instance, the syntax for a
767       block and an anonymous hash reference constructor look the same unless
768       there's something in the braces to give Perl a hint.  The ellipsis is a
769       syntax error if Perl doesn't guess that the "{ ... }" is a block.
770       Inside your block, you can use a ";" before the ellipsis to denote that
771       the "{ ... }" is a block and not a hash reference constructor.
772
773       Note: Some folks colloquially refer to this bit of punctuation as a
774       "yada-yada" or "triple-dot", but its true name is actually an ellipsis.
775
776   PODs: Embedded Documentation
777       Perl has a mechanism for intermixing documentation with source code.
778       While it's expecting the beginning of a new statement, if the compiler
779       encounters a line that begins with an equal sign and a word, like this
780
781           =head1 Here There Be Pods!
782
783       Then that text and all remaining text up through and including a line
784       beginning with "=cut" will be ignored.  The format of the intervening
785       text is described in perlpod.
786
787       This allows you to intermix your source code and your documentation
788       text freely, as in
789
790           =item snazzle($)
791
792           The snazzle() function will behave in the most spectacular
793           form that you can possibly imagine, not even excepting
794           cybernetic pyrotechnics.
795
796           =cut back to the compiler, nuff of this pod stuff!
797
798           sub snazzle($) {
799               my $thingie = shift;
800               .........
801           }
802
803       Note that pod translators should look at only paragraphs beginning with
804       a pod directive (it makes parsing easier), whereas the compiler
805       actually knows to look for pod escapes even in the middle of a
806       paragraph.  This means that the following secret stuff will be ignored
807       by both the compiler and the translators.
808
809           $a=3;
810           =secret stuff
811            warn "Neither POD nor CODE!?"
812           =cut back
813           print "got $a\n";
814
815       You probably shouldn't rely upon the "warn()" being podded out forever.
816       Not all pod translators are well-behaved in this regard, and perhaps
817       the compiler will become pickier.
818
819       One may also use pod directives to quickly comment out a section of
820       code.
821
822   Plain Old Comments (Not!)
823       Perl can process line directives, much like the C preprocessor.  Using
824       this, one can control Perl's idea of filenames and line numbers in
825       error or warning messages (especially for strings that are processed
826       with "eval()").  The syntax for this mechanism is almost the same as
827       for most C preprocessors: it matches the regular expression
828
829           # example: '# line 42 "new_filename.plx"'
830           /^\#   \s*
831             line \s+ (\d+)   \s*
832             (?:\s("?)([^"]+)\g2)? \s*
833            $/x
834
835       with $1 being the line number for the next line, and $3 being the
836       optional filename (specified with or without quotes).  Note that no
837       whitespace may precede the "#", unlike modern C preprocessors.
838
839       There is a fairly obvious gotcha included with the line directive:
840       Debuggers and profilers will only show the last source line to appear
841       at a particular line number in a given file.  Care should be taken not
842       to cause line number collisions in code you'd like to debug later.
843
844       Here are some examples that you should be able to type into your
845       command shell:
846
847           % perl
848           # line 200 "bzzzt"
849           # the '#' on the previous line must be the first char on line
850           die 'foo';
851           __END__
852           foo at bzzzt line 201.
853
854           % perl
855           # line 200 "bzzzt"
856           eval qq[\n#line 2001 ""\ndie 'foo']; print $@;
857           __END__
858           foo at - line 2001.
859
860           % perl
861           eval qq[\n#line 200 "foo bar"\ndie 'foo']; print $@;
862           __END__
863           foo at foo bar line 200.
864
865           % perl
866           # line 345 "goop"
867           eval "\n#line " . __LINE__ . ' "' . __FILE__ ."\"\ndie 'foo'";
868           print $@;
869           __END__
870           foo at goop line 345.
871
872   Experimental Details on given and when
873       As previously mentioned, the "switch" feature is considered highly
874       experimental; it is subject to change with little notice.  In
875       particular, "when" has tricky behaviours that are expected to change to
876       become less tricky in the future.  Do not rely upon its current
877       (mis)implementation.  Before Perl 5.18, "given" also had tricky
878       behaviours that you should still beware of if your code must run on
879       older versions of Perl.
880
881       Here is a longer example of "given":
882
883           use feature ":5.10";
884           given ($foo) {
885               when (undef) {
886                   say '$foo is undefined';
887               }
888               when ("foo") {
889                   say '$foo is the string "foo"';
890               }
891               when ([1,3,5,7,9]) {
892                   say '$foo is an odd digit';
893                   continue; # Fall through
894               }
895               when ($_ < 100) {
896                   say '$foo is numerically less than 100';
897               }
898               when (\&complicated_check) {
899                   say 'a complicated check for $foo is true';
900               }
901               default {
902                   die q(I don't know what to do with $foo);
903               }
904           }
905
906       Before Perl 5.18, "given(EXPR)" assigned the value of EXPR to merely a
907       lexically scoped copy (!) of $_, not a dynamically scoped alias the way
908       "foreach" does.  That made it similar to
909
910               do { my $_ = EXPR; ... }
911
912       except that the block was automatically broken out of by a successful
913       "when" or an explicit "break".  Because it was only a copy, and because
914       it was only lexically scoped, not dynamically scoped, you could not do
915       the things with it that you are used to in a "foreach" loop.  In
916       particular, it did not work for arbitrary function calls if those
917       functions might try to access $_.  Best stick to "foreach" for that.
918
919       Most of the power comes from the implicit smartmatching that can
920       sometimes apply.  Most of the time, "when(EXPR)" is treated as an
921       implicit smartmatch of $_, that is, "$_ ~~ EXPR".  (See "Smartmatch
922       Operator" in perlop for more information on smartmatching.)  But when
923       EXPR is one of the 10 exceptional cases (or things like them) listed
924       below, it is used directly as a boolean.
925
926       1.  A user-defined subroutine call or a method invocation.
927
928       2.  A regular expression match in the form of "/REGEX/", "$foo =~
929           /REGEX/", or "$foo =~ EXPR".  Also, a negated regular expression
930           match in the form "!/REGEX/", "$foo !~ /REGEX/", or "$foo !~ EXPR".
931
932       3.  A smart match that uses an explicit "~~" operator, such as "EXPR ~~
933           EXPR".
934
935           NOTE: You will often have to use "$c ~~ $_" because the default
936           case uses "$_ ~~ $c" , which is frequently the opposite of what you
937           want.
938
939       4.  A boolean comparison operator such as "$_ < 10" or "$x eq "abc"".
940           The relational operators that this applies to are the six numeric
941           comparisons ("<", ">", "<=", ">=", "==", and "!="), and the six
942           string comparisons ("lt", "gt", "le", "ge", "eq", and "ne").
943
944       5.  At least the three builtin functions "defined(...)", "exists(...)",
945           and "eof(...)".  We might someday add more of these later if we
946           think of them.
947
948       6.  A negated expression, whether "!(EXPR)" or "not(EXPR)", or a
949           logical exclusive-or, "(EXPR1) xor (EXPR2)".  The bitwise versions
950           ("~" and "^") are not included.
951
952       7.  A filetest operator, with exactly 4 exceptions: "-s", "-M", "-A",
953           and "-C", as these return numerical values, not boolean ones.  The
954           "-z" filetest operator is not included in the exception list.
955
956       8.  The ".." and "..." flip-flop operators.  Note that the "..." flip-
957           flop operator is completely different from the "..." elliptical
958           statement just described.
959
960       In those 8 cases above, the value of EXPR is used directly as a
961       boolean, so no smartmatching is done.  You may think of "when" as a
962       smartsmartmatch.
963
964       Furthermore, Perl inspects the operands of logical operators to decide
965       whether to use smartmatching for each one by applying the above test to
966       the operands:
967
968       9.  If EXPR is "EXPR1 && EXPR2" or "EXPR1 and EXPR2", the test is
969           applied recursively to both EXPR1 and EXPR2.  Only if both operands
970           also pass the test, recursively, will the expression be treated as
971           boolean.  Otherwise, smartmatching is used.
972
973       10. If EXPR is "EXPR1 || EXPR2", "EXPR1 // EXPR2", or "EXPR1 or EXPR2",
974           the test is applied recursively to EXPR1 only (which might itself
975           be a higher-precedence AND operator, for example, and thus subject
976           to the previous rule), not to EXPR2.  If EXPR1 is to use
977           smartmatching, then EXPR2 also does so, no matter what EXPR2
978           contains.  But if EXPR2 does not get to use smartmatching, then the
979           second argument will not be either.  This is quite different from
980           the "&&" case just described, so be careful.
981
982       These rules are complicated, but the goal is for them to do what you
983       want (even if you don't quite understand why they are doing it).  For
984       example:
985
986           when (/^\d+$/ && $_ < 75) { ... }
987
988       will be treated as a boolean match because the rules say both a regex
989       match and an explicit test on $_ will be treated as boolean.
990
991       Also:
992
993           when ([qw(foo bar)] && /baz/) { ... }
994
995       will use smartmatching because only one of the operands is a boolean:
996       the other uses smartmatching, and that wins.
997
998       Further:
999
1000           when ([qw(foo bar)] || /^baz/) { ... }
1001
1002       will use smart matching (only the first operand is considered), whereas
1003
1004           when (/^baz/ || [qw(foo bar)]) { ... }
1005
1006       will test only the regex, which causes both operands to be treated as
1007       boolean.  Watch out for this one, then, because an arrayref is always a
1008       true value, which makes it effectively redundant.  Not a good idea.
1009
1010       Tautologous boolean operators are still going to be optimized away.
1011       Don't be tempted to write
1012
1013           when ("foo" or "bar") { ... }
1014
1015       This will optimize down to "foo", so "bar" will never be considered
1016       (even though the rules say to use a smartmatch on "foo").  For an
1017       alternation like this, an array ref will work, because this will
1018       instigate smartmatching:
1019
1020           when ([qw(foo bar)] { ... }
1021
1022       This is somewhat equivalent to the C-style switch statement's
1023       fallthrough functionality (not to be confused with Perl's fallthrough
1024       functionality--see below), wherein the same block is used for several
1025       "case" statements.
1026
1027       Another useful shortcut is that, if you use a literal array or hash as
1028       the argument to "given", it is turned into a reference.  So
1029       "given(@foo)" is the same as "given(\@foo)", for example.
1030
1031       "default" behaves exactly like "when(1 == 1)", which is to say that it
1032       always matches.
1033
1034       Breaking out
1035
1036       You can use the "break" keyword to break out of the enclosing "given"
1037       block.  Every "when" block is implicitly ended with a "break".
1038
1039       Fall-through
1040
1041       You can use the "continue" keyword to fall through from one case to the
1042       next immediate "when" or "default":
1043
1044           given($foo) {
1045               when (/x/) { say '$foo contains an x'; continue }
1046               when (/y/) { say '$foo contains a y'            }
1047               default    { say '$foo does not contain a y'    }
1048           }
1049
1050       Return value
1051
1052       When a "given" statement is also a valid expression (for example, when
1053       it's the last statement of a block), it evaluates to:
1054
1055       •   An empty list as soon as an explicit "break" is encountered.
1056
1057       •   The value of the last evaluated expression of the successful
1058           "when"/"default" clause, if there happens to be one.
1059
1060       •   The value of the last evaluated expression of the "given" block if
1061           no condition is true.
1062
1063       In both last cases, the last expression is evaluated in the context
1064       that was applied to the "given" block.
1065
1066       Note that, unlike "if" and "unless", failed "when" statements always
1067       evaluate to an empty list.
1068
1069           my $price = do {
1070               given ($item) {
1071                   when (["pear", "apple"]) { 1 }
1072                   break when "vote";      # My vote cannot be bought
1073                   1e10  when /Mona Lisa/;
1074                   "unknown";
1075               }
1076           };
1077
1078       Currently, "given" blocks can't always be used as proper expressions.
1079       This may be addressed in a future version of Perl.
1080
1081       Switching in a loop
1082
1083       Instead of using "given()", you can use a "foreach()" loop.  For
1084       example, here's one way to count how many times a particular string
1085       occurs in an array:
1086
1087           use v5.10.1;
1088           my $count = 0;
1089           for (@array) {
1090               when ("foo") { ++$count }
1091           }
1092           print "\@array contains $count copies of 'foo'\n";
1093
1094       Or in a more recent version:
1095
1096           use v5.14;
1097           my $count = 0;
1098           for (@array) {
1099               ++$count when "foo";
1100           }
1101           print "\@array contains $count copies of 'foo'\n";
1102
1103       At the end of all "when" blocks, there is an implicit "next".  You can
1104       override that with an explicit "last" if you're interested in only the
1105       first match alone.
1106
1107       This doesn't work if you explicitly specify a loop variable, as in "for
1108       $item (@array)".  You have to use the default variable $_.
1109
1110       Differences from Raku
1111
1112       The Perl 5 smartmatch and "given"/"when" constructs are not compatible
1113       with their Raku analogues.  The most visible difference and least
1114       important difference is that, in Perl 5, parentheses are required
1115       around the argument to "given()" and "when()" (except when this last
1116       one is used as a statement modifier).  Parentheses in Raku are always
1117       optional in a control construct such as "if()", "while()", or "when()";
1118       they can't be made optional in Perl 5 without a great deal of potential
1119       confusion, because Perl 5 would parse the expression
1120
1121           given $foo {
1122               ...
1123           }
1124
1125       as though the argument to "given" were an element of the hash %foo,
1126       interpreting the braces as hash-element syntax.
1127
1128       However, their are many, many other differences.  For example, this
1129       works in Perl 5:
1130
1131           use v5.12;
1132           my @primary = ("red", "blue", "green");
1133
1134           if (@primary ~~ "red") {
1135               say "primary smartmatches red";
1136           }
1137
1138           if ("red" ~~ @primary) {
1139               say "red smartmatches primary";
1140           }
1141
1142           say "that's all, folks!";
1143
1144       But it doesn't work at all in Raku.  Instead, you should use the
1145       (parallelizable) "any" operator:
1146
1147          if any(@primary) eq "red" {
1148              say "primary smartmatches red";
1149          }
1150
1151          if "red" eq any(@primary) {
1152              say "red smartmatches primary";
1153          }
1154
1155       The table of smartmatches in "Smartmatch Operator" in perlop is not
1156       identical to that proposed by the Raku specification, mainly due to
1157       differences between Raku's and Perl 5's data models, but also because
1158       the Raku spec has changed since Perl 5 rushed into early adoption.
1159
1160       In Raku, "when()" will always do an implicit smartmatch with its
1161       argument, while in Perl 5 it is convenient (albeit potentially
1162       confusing) to suppress this implicit smartmatch in various rather
1163       loosely-defined situations, as roughly outlined above.  (The difference
1164       is largely because Perl 5 does not have, even internally, a boolean
1165       type.)
1166
1167
1168
1169perl v5.32.1                      2021-05-31                        PERLSYN(1)
Impressum