1MU-INDEX(1) General Commands Manual MU-INDEX(1)
2
3
4
6 mu index - index e-mail messages stored in Maildirs
7
8
10 mu index [options]
11
12
14 mu index is the mu command for scanning the contents of Maildir direc‐
15 tories and storing the results in a Xapian database. The data can then
16 be queried using mu-find(1).
17
18 Before the first time you run mu index, you must run mu init to ini‐
19 tialize the database.
20
21 index understands Maildirs as defined by Daniel Bernstein for qmail(7).
22 In addition, it understands recursive Maildirs (Maildirs within
23 Maildirs), Maildir++. It can also deal with VFAT-based Maildirs which
24 use '!' or ';' as the separators instead of ':'.
25
26 E-mail messages which are not stored in something resembling a maildir
27 leaf-directory (cur and new) are ignored, as are the cache directories
28 for notmuch and gnus, and any dot-directory.
29
30 Starting with mu 1.5.x, symlinks are followed, and can be spread over
31 multiple filesystems; however note that moving files around is much
32 faster when multiple filesystems are not involved.
33
34 If there is a file called .noindex in a directory, the contents of that
35 directory and all of its subdirectories will be ignored. This can be
36 useful to exclude certain directories from the indexing process, for
37 example directories with spam-messages.
38
39 If there is a file called .noupdate in a directory, the contents of
40 that directory and all of its subdirectories will be ignored, unless we
41 do a full rebuild (with mu init). This can be useful to speed up things
42 you have some maildirs that never change. Note that you can still
43 search for these messages, this only affects updating the database.
44 .noupdate is ignored when you start indexing with an empty database
45 (such as directly after mu init.
46
47 There also the --lazy-check which can greatly speed up indexing; see
48 below for details.
49
50 The first run of mu index may take a few minutes if you have a lot of
51 mail (tens of thousands of messages). Fortunately, such a full scan
52 needs to be done only once; after that it suffices to index the
53 changes, which goes much faster. See the 'Note on performance
54 (i,ii,iii)' below for more information.
55
56 The optional 'phase two' of the indexing-process is the removal of mes‐
57 sages from the database for which there is no longer a corresponding
58 file in the Maildir. If you do not want this, you can use -n, --no‐
59 cleanup.
60
61 When mu index catches one of the signals SIGINT, SIGHUP or SIGTERM
62 (e.g., when you press Ctrl-C during the indexing process), it tries to
63 shutdown gracefully; it tries to save and commit data, and close the
64 database etc. If it receives another signal (e.g., when pressing Ctrl-C
65 once more), mu index will terminate immediately.
66
67
69 Some of the general options are described in the mu(1) man-page and not
70 here, as they apply to multiple mu commands.
71
72
73 --lazy-check
74 in lazy-check mode, mu does not consider messages for which the
75 time-stamp (ctime) of the directory they reside in has not
76 changed since the previous indexing run. This is much faster
77 than the non-lazy check, but won't update messages that have
78 change (rather than having been added or removed), since merely
79 editing a message does not update the directory time-stamp. Of
80 course, you can run mu-index occasionally without --lazy-check,
81 to pick up such messages.
82
83
84 --nocleanup
85 disables the database cleanup that mu does by default after in‐
86 dexing.
87
88
89 A note on performance (i)
90 As a non-scientific benchmark, a simple test on the author's machine (a
91 Thinkpad X61s laptop using Linux 2.6.35 and an ext3 file system) with
92 no existing database, and a maildir with 27273 messages:
93
94 $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
95 $ time mu index --quiet
96 66,65s user 6,05s system 27% cpu 4:24,20 total
97 (about 103 messages per second)
98
99 A second run, which is the more typical use case when there is a data‐
100 base already, goes much faster:
101
102 $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
103 $ time mu index --quiet
104 0,48s user 0,76s system 10% cpu 11,796 total
105 (more than 56818 messages per second)
106
107 Note that each test flushes the caches first; a more common use case
108 might be to run mu index when new mail has arrived; the cache may stay
109 quite 'warm' in that case:
110
111 $ time mu index --quiet
112 0,33s user 0,40s system 80% cpu 0,905 total
113 which is more than 30000 messages per second.
114
115
116
117 A note on performance (ii)
118 As per June 2012, we did the same non-scientific benchmark, this time
119 with an Intel i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz, an ext4 file system and a maildir
120 with 22589 messages. We start without an existing database.
121
122 $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
123 $ time mu index --quiet
124 27,79s user 2,17s system 48% cpu 1:01,47 total
125 (about 813 messages per second)
126
127 A second run, which is the more typical use case when there is a data‐
128 base already, goes much faster:
129
130 $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
131 $ time mu index --quiet
132 0,13s user 0,30s system 19% cpu 2,162 total
133 (more than 173000 messages per second)
134
135
136
137 A note on performance (iii)
138 As per July 2016, we did the same non-scientific benchmark, again with
139 the Intel i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz, an ext4 file system. This time, the
140 maildir contains 72525 messages.
141
142 $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
143 $ time mu index --quiet
144 40,34s user 2,56s system 64% cpu 1:06,17 total
145 (about 1099 messages per second).
146
147
148 A note on performance (iv)
149 A few years later and its June 2022. There's a lot more happening dur‐
150 ing indexing, but indexing became multi-threaded and machines are
151 faster; e.g. this is with an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (32) @
152 3.399GHz.
153
154 The instructions are a little different since we have a proper repeat‐
155 able benchmark now. After building,
156
157 $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
158 % THREAD_NUM=4 build/lib/tests/bench-indexer -m perf
159 # random seed: R02Sf5c50e4851ec51adaf301e0e054bd52b
160 1..1
161 # Start of bench tests
162 # Start of indexer tests
163 indexed 5000 messages in 20 maildirs in 3763ms; 752 μs/message; 1328 messages/s (4 thread(s))
164 ok 1 /bench/indexer/4-cores
165 # End of indexer tests
166 # End of bench tests
167
168 Things are again a little faster, even though the index does a lot more
169 now (text-normalizatian, and pre-generating message-sexps). A faster
170 machine helps, too!
171
172
174 mu index return 0 upon successful completion; any other number signals
175 an error.
176
177
179 Please report bugs if you find any: https://github.com/djcb/mu/issues
180
181
183 Dirk-Jan C. Binnema <djcb@djcbsoftware.nl>
184
185
187 maildir(5), mu(1), mu-init(1), mu-find(1), mu-cfind(1)
188
189
190
191User Manuals June 2022 MU-INDEX(1)