1PERLMODSTYLE(1) Perl Programmers Reference Guide PERLMODSTYLE(1)
2
3
4
6 perlmodstyle - Perl module style guide
7
9 This document attempts to describe the Perl Community's "best practice"
10 for writing Perl modules. It extends the recommendations found in
11 perlstyle , which should be considered required reading before reading
12 this document.
13
14 While this document is intended to be useful to all module authors, it
15 is particularly aimed at authors who wish to publish their modules on
16 CPAN.
17
18 The focus is on elements of style which are visible to the users of a
19 module, rather than those parts which are only seen by the module's
20 developers. However, many of the guidelines presented in this document
21 can be extrapolated and applied successfully to a module's internals.
22
23 This document differs from perlnewmod in that it is a style guide
24 rather than a tutorial on creating CPAN modules. It provides a check‐
25 list against which modules can be compared to determine whether they
26 conform to best practice, without necessarily describing in detail how
27 to achieve this.
28
29 All the advice contained in this document has been gleaned from exten‐
30 sive conversations with experienced CPAN authors and users. Every
31 piece of advice given here is the result of previous mistakes. This
32 information is here to help you avoid the same mistakes and the extra
33 work that would inevitably be required to fix them.
34
35 The first section of this document provides an itemized checklist; sub‐
36 sequent sections provide a more detailed discussion of the items on the
37 list. The final section, "Common Pitfalls", describes some of the most
38 popular mistakes made by CPAN authors.
39
41 For more detail on each item in this checklist, see below.
42
43 Before you start
44
45 · Don't re-invent the wheel
46
47 · Patch, extend or subclass an existing module where possible
48
49 · Do one thing and do it well
50
51 · Choose an appropriate name
52
53 The API
54
55 · API should be understandable by the average programmer
56
57 · Simple methods for simple tasks
58
59 · Separate functionality from output
60
61 · Consistent naming of subroutines or methods
62
63 · Use named parameters (a hash or hashref) when there are more than
64 two parameters
65
66 Stability
67
68 · Ensure your module works under "use strict" and "-w"
69
70 · Stable modules should maintain backwards compatibility
71
72 Documentation
73
74 · Write documentation in POD
75
76 · Document purpose, scope and target applications
77
78 · Document each publically accessible method or subroutine, including
79 params and return values
80
81 · Give examples of use in your documentation
82
83 · Provide a README file and perhaps also release notes, changelog,
84 etc
85
86 · Provide links to further information (URL, email)
87
88 Release considerations
89
90 · Specify pre-requisites in Makefile.PL or Build.PL
91
92 · Specify Perl version requirements with "use"
93
94 · Include tests with your module
95
96 · Choose a sensible and consistent version numbering scheme (X.YY is
97 the common Perl module numbering scheme)
98
99 · Increment the version number for every change, no matter how small
100
101 · Package the module using "make dist"
102
103 · Choose an appropriate license (GPL/Artistic is a good default)
104
106 Try not to launch headlong into developing your module without spending
107 some time thinking first. A little forethought may save you a vast
108 amount of effort later on.
109
110 Has it been done before?
111
112 You may not even need to write the module. Check whether it's already
113 been done in Perl, and avoid re-inventing the wheel unless you have a
114 good reason.
115
116 Good places to look for pre-existing modules include
117 http://search.cpan.org/ and asking on modules@perl.org
118
119 If an existing module almost does what you want, consider writing a
120 patch, writing a subclass, or otherwise extending the existing module
121 rather than rewriting it.
122
123 Do one thing and do it well
124
125 At the risk of stating the obvious, modules are intended to be modular.
126 A Perl developer should be able to use modules to put together the
127 building blocks of their application. However, it's important that the
128 blocks are the right shape, and that the developer shouldn't have to
129 use a big block when all they need is a small one.
130
131 Your module should have a clearly defined scope which is no longer than
132 a single sentence. Can your module be broken down into a family of
133 related modules?
134
135 Bad example:
136
137 "FooBar.pm provides an implementation of the FOO protocol and the
138 related BAR standard."
139
140 Good example:
141
142 "Foo.pm provides an implementation of the FOO protocol. Bar.pm imple‐
143 ments the related BAR protocol."
144
145 This means that if a developer only needs a module for the BAR stan‐
146 dard, they should not be forced to install libraries for FOO as well.
147
148 What's in a name?
149
150 Make sure you choose an appropriate name for your module early on.
151 This will help people find and remember your module, and make program‐
152 ming with your module more intuitive.
153
154 When naming your module, consider the following:
155
156 · Be descriptive (i.e. accurately describes the purpose of the mod‐
157 ule).
158
159 · Be consistent with existing modules.
160
161 · Reflect the functionality of the module, not the implementation.
162
163 · Avoid starting a new top-level hierarchy, especially if a suitable
164 hierarchy already exists under which you could place your module.
165
166 You should contact modules@perl.org to ask them about your module name
167 before publishing your module. You should also try to ask people who
168 are already familiar with the module's application domain and the CPAN
169 naming system. Authors of similar modules, or modules with similar
170 names, may be a good place to start.
171
173 Considerations for module design and coding:
174
175 To OO or not to OO?
176
177 Your module may be object oriented (OO) or not, or it may have both
178 kinds of interfaces available. There are pros and cons of each tech‐
179 nique, which should be considered when you design your API.
180
181 According to Damian Conway, you should consider using OO:
182
183 · When the system is large or likely to become so
184
185 · When the data is aggregated in obvious structures that will become
186 objects
187
188 · When the types of data form a natural hierarchy that can make use
189 of inheritance
190
191 · When operations on data vary according to data type (making poly‐
192 morphic invocation of methods feasible)
193
194 · When it is likely that new data types may be later introduced into
195 the system, and will need to be handled by existing code
196
197 · When interactions between data are best represented by overloaded
198 operators
199
200 · When the implementation of system components is likely to change
201 over time (and hence should be encapsulated)
202
203 · When the system design is itself object-oriented
204
205 · When large amounts of client code will use the software (and should
206 be insulated from changes in its implementation)
207
208 · When many separate operations will need to be applied to the same
209 set of data
210
211 Think carefully about whether OO is appropriate for your module. Gra‐
212 tuitous object orientation results in complex APIs which are difficult
213 for the average module user to understand or use.
214
215 Designing your API
216
217 Your interfaces should be understandable by an average Perl programmer.
218 The following guidelines may help you judge whether your API is suffi‐
219 ciently straightforward:
220
221 Write simple routines to do simple things.
222 It's better to have numerous simple routines than a few monolithic
223 ones. If your routine changes its behaviour significantly based on
224 its arguments, it's a sign that you should have two (or more) sepa‐
225 rate routines.
226
227 Separate functionality from output.
228 Return your results in the most generic form possible and allow the
229 user to choose how to use them. The most generic form possible is
230 usually a Perl data structure which can then be used to generate a
231 text report, HTML, XML, a database query, or whatever else your
232 users require.
233
234 If your routine iterates through some kind of list (such as a list
235 of files, or records in a database) you may consider providing a
236 callback so that users can manipulate each element of the list in
237 turn. File::Find provides an example of this with its
238 "find(\&wanted, $dir)" syntax.
239
240 Provide sensible shortcuts and defaults.
241 Don't require every module user to jump through the same hoops to
242 achieve a simple result. You can always include optional parame‐
243 ters or routines for more complex or non-standard behaviour. If
244 most of your users have to type a few almost identical lines of
245 code when they start using your module, it's a sign that you should
246 have made that behaviour a default. Another good indicator that
247 you should use defaults is if most of your users call your routines
248 with the same arguments.
249
250 Naming conventions
251 Your naming should be consistent. For instance, it's better to
252 have:
253
254 display_day();
255 display_week();
256 display_year();
257
258 than
259
260 display_day();
261 week_display();
262 show_year();
263
264 This applies equally to method names, parameter names, and anything
265 else which is visible to the user (and most things that aren't!)
266
267 Parameter passing
268 Use named parameters. It's easier to use a hash like this:
269
270 $obj->do_something(
271 name => "wibble",
272 type => "text",
273 size => 1024,
274 );
275
276 ... than to have a long list of unnamed parameters like this:
277
278 $obj->do_something("wibble", "text", 1024);
279
280 While the list of arguments might work fine for one, two or even
281 three arguments, any more arguments become hard for the module user
282 to remember, and hard for the module author to manage. If you want
283 to add a new parameter you will have to add it to the end of the
284 list for backward compatibility, and this will probably make your
285 list order unintuitive. Also, if many elements may be undefined
286 you may see the following unattractive method calls:
287
288 $obj->do_something(undef, undef, undef, undef, undef, undef, 1024);
289
290 Provide sensible defaults for parameters which have them. Don't
291 make your users specify parameters which will almost always be the
292 same.
293
294 The issue of whether to pass the arguments in a hash or a hashref
295 is largely a matter of personal style.
296
297 The use of hash keys starting with a hyphen ("-name") or entirely
298 in upper case ("NAME") is a relic of older versions of Perl in
299 which ordinary lower case strings were not handled correctly by the
300 "=>" operator. While some modules retain uppercase or hyphenated
301 argument keys for historical reasons or as a matter of personal
302 style, most new modules should use simple lower case keys. What‐
303 ever you choose, be consistent!
304
305 Strictness and warnings
306
307 Your module should run successfully under the strict pragma and should
308 run without generating any warnings. Your module should also handle
309 taint-checking where appropriate, though this can cause difficulties in
310 many cases.
311
312 Backwards compatibility
313
314 Modules which are "stable" should not break backwards compatibility
315 without at least a long transition phase and a major change in version
316 number.
317
318 Error handling and messages
319
320 When your module encounters an error it should do one or more of:
321
322 · Return an undefined value.
323
324 · set $Module::errstr or similar ("errstr" is a common name used by
325 DBI and other popular modules; if you choose something else, be
326 sure to document it clearly).
327
328 · "warn()" or "carp()" a message to STDERR.
329
330 · "croak()" only when your module absolutely cannot figure out what
331 to do. ("croak()" is a better version of "die()" for use within
332 modules, which reports its errors from the perspective of the call‐
333 er. See Carp for details of "croak()", "carp()" and other useful
334 routines.)
335
336 · As an alternative to the above, you may prefer to throw exceptions
337 using the Error module.
338
339 Configurable error handling can be very useful to your users. Consider
340 offering a choice of levels for warning and debug messages, an option
341 to send messages to a separate file, a way to specify an error-handling
342 routine, or other such features. Be sure to default all these options
343 to the commonest use.
344
346 POD
347
348 Your module should include documentation aimed at Perl developers. You
349 should use Perl's "plain old documentation" (POD) for your general
350 technical documentation, though you may wish to write additional docu‐
351 mentation (white papers, tutorials, etc) in some other format. You
352 need to cover the following subjects:
353
354 · A synopsis of the common uses of the module
355
356 · The purpose, scope and target applications of your module
357
358 · Use of each publically accessible method or subroutine, including
359 parameters and return values
360
361 · Examples of use
362
363 · Sources of further information
364
365 · A contact email address for the author/maintainer
366
367 The level of detail in Perl module documentation generally goes from
368 less detailed to more detailed. Your SYNOPSIS section should contain a
369 minimal example of use (perhaps as little as one line of code; skip the
370 unusual use cases or anything not needed by most users); the DESCRIP‐
371 TION should describe your module in broad terms, generally in just a
372 few paragraphs; more detail of the module's routines or methods,
373 lengthy code examples, or other in-depth material should be given in
374 subsequent sections.
375
376 Ideally, someone who's slightly familiar with your module should be
377 able to refresh their memory without hitting "page down". As your
378 reader continues through the document, they should receive a progres‐
379 sively greater amount of knowledge.
380
381 The recommended order of sections in Perl module documentation is:
382
383 · NAME
384
385 · SYNOPSIS
386
387 · DESCRIPTION
388
389 · One or more sections or subsections giving greater detail of avail‐
390 able methods and routines and any other relevant information.
391
392 · BUGS/CAVEATS/etc
393
394 · AUTHOR
395
396 · SEE ALSO
397
398 · COPYRIGHT and LICENSE
399
400 Keep your documentation near the code it documents ("inline" documenta‐
401 tion). Include POD for a given method right above that method's sub‐
402 routine. This makes it easier to keep the documentation up to date,
403 and avoids having to document each piece of code twice (once in POD and
404 once in comments).
405
406 README, INSTALL, release notes, changelogs
407
408 Your module should also include a README file describing the module and
409 giving pointers to further information (website, author email).
410
411 An INSTALL file should be included, and should contain simple installa‐
412 tion instructions. When using ExtUtils::MakeMaker this will usually be:
413
414 perl Makefile.PL
415 make
416 make test
417 make install
418
419 When using Module::Build, this will usually be:
420
421 perl Build.PL
422 perl Build
423 perl Build test
424 perl Build install
425
426 Release notes or changelogs should be produced for each release of your
427 software describing user-visible changes to your module, in terms rele‐
428 vant to the user.
429
431 Version numbering
432
433 Version numbers should indicate at least major and minor releases, and
434 possibly sub-minor releases. A major release is one in which most of
435 the functionality has changed, or in which major new functionality is
436 added. A minor release is one in which a small amount of functionality
437 has been added or changed. Sub-minor version numbers are usually used
438 for changes which do not affect functionality, such as documentation
439 patches.
440
441 The most common CPAN version numbering scheme looks like this:
442
443 1.00, 1.10, 1.11, 1.20, 1.30, 1.31, 1.32
444
445 A correct CPAN version number is a floating point number with at least
446 2 digits after the decimal. You can test whether it conforms to CPAN by
447 using
448
449 perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -le 'print MM->parse_version(shift)' 'Foo.pm'
450
451 If you want to release a 'beta' or 'alpha' version of a module but
452 don't want CPAN.pm to list it as most recent use an '_' after the regu‐
453 lar version number followed by at least 2 digits, eg. 1.20_01. If you
454 do this, the following idiom is recommended:
455
456 $VERSION = "1.12_01";
457 $XS_VERSION = $VERSION; # only needed if you have XS code
458 $VERSION = eval $VERSION;
459
460 With that trick MakeMaker will only read the first line and thus read
461 the underscore, while the perl interpreter will evaluate the $VERSION
462 and convert the string into a number. Later operations that treat $VER‐
463 SION as a number will then be able to do so without provoking a warning
464 about $VERSION not being a number.
465
466 Never release anything (even a one-word documentation patch) without
467 incrementing the number. Even a one-word documentation patch should
468 result in a change in version at the sub-minor level.
469
470 Pre-requisites
471
472 Module authors should carefully consider whether to rely on other mod‐
473 ules, and which modules to rely on.
474
475 Most importantly, choose modules which are as stable as possible. In
476 order of preference:
477
478 · Core Perl modules
479
480 · Stable CPAN modules
481
482 · Unstable CPAN modules
483
484 · Modules not available from CPAN
485
486 Specify version requirements for other Perl modules in the pre-requi‐
487 sites in your Makefile.PL or Build.PL.
488
489 Be sure to specify Perl version requirements both in Makefile.PL or
490 Build.PL and with "require 5.6.1" or similar. See the section on "use
491 VERSION" of "require" in perlfunc for details.
492
493 Testing
494
495 All modules should be tested before distribution (using "make
496 disttest"), and the tests should also be available to people installing
497 the modules (using "make test"). For Module::Build you would use the
498 "make test" equivalent "perl Build test".
499
500 The importance of these tests is proportional to the alleged stability
501 of a module -- a module which purports to be stable or which hopes to
502 achieve wide use should adhere to as strict a testing regime as possi‐
503 ble.
504
505 Useful modules to help you write tests (with minimum impact on your
506 development process or your time) include Test::Simple, Carp::Assert
507 and Test::Inline. For more sophisticated test suites there are
508 Test::More and Test::MockObject.
509
510 Packaging
511
512 Modules should be packaged using one of the standard packaging tools.
513 Currently you have the choice between ExtUtils::MakeMaker and the more
514 platform independent Module::Build, allowing modules to be installed in
515 a consistent manner. When using ExtUtils::MakeMaker, you can use "make
516 dist" to create your package. Tools exist to help you to build your
517 module in a MakeMaker-friendly style. These include ExtUtils::Module‐
518 Maker and h2xs. See also perlnewmod.
519
520 Licensing
521
522 Make sure that your module has a license, and that the full text of it
523 is included in the distribution (unless it's a common one and the terms
524 of the license don't require you to include it).
525
526 If you don't know what license to use, dual licensing under the GPL and
527 Artistic licenses (the same as Perl itself) is a good idea. See perl‐
528 gpl and perlartistic.
529
531 Reinventing the wheel
532
533 There are certain application spaces which are already very, very well
534 served by CPAN. One example is templating systems, another is date and
535 time modules, and there are many more. While it is a rite of passage
536 to write your own version of these things, please consider carefully
537 whether the Perl world really needs you to publish it.
538
539 Trying to do too much
540
541 Your module will be part of a developer's toolkit. It will not, in
542 itself, form the entire toolkit. It's tempting to add extra features
543 until your code is a monolithic system rather than a set of modular
544 building blocks.
545
546 Inappropriate documentation
547
548 Don't fall into the trap of writing for the wrong audience. Your pri‐
549 mary audience is a reasonably experienced developer with at least a
550 moderate understanding of your module's application domain, who's just
551 downloaded your module and wants to start using it as quickly as possi‐
552 ble.
553
554 Tutorials, end-user documentation, research papers, FAQs etc are not
555 appropriate in a module's main documentation. If you really want to
556 write these, include them as sub-documents such as "My::Module::Tuto‐
557 rial" or "My::Module::FAQ" and provide a link in the SEE ALSO section
558 of the main documentation.
559
561 perlstyle
562 General Perl style guide
563
564 perlnewmod
565 How to create a new module
566
567 perlpod
568 POD documentation
569
570 podchecker
571 Verifies your POD's correctness
572
573 Packaging Tools
574 ExtUtils::MakeMaker, Module::Build
575
576 Testing tools
577 Test::Simple, Test::Inline, Carp::Assert, Test::More, Test::MockOb‐
578 ject
579
580 http://pause.perl.org/
581 Perl Authors Upload Server. Contains links to information for mod‐
582 ule authors.
583
584 Any good book on software engineering
585
587 Kirrily "Skud" Robert <skud@cpan.org>
588
589
590
591perl v5.8.8 2006-01-07 PERLMODSTYLE(1)