1r.sim.water(1)                Grass User's Manual               r.sim.water(1)
2
3
4

NAME

6       r.sim.water   -  Overland flow hydrologic model based on duality parti‐
7       cle-field concept (SIMWE)
8

KEYWORDS

10       raster
11

SYNOPSIS

13       r.sim.water
14       r.sim.water help
15       r.sim.water [-mt]  elevin=string  dxin=string  dyin=string  rain=string
16       infil=string       [traps=string]      manin=string      [sites=string]
17       [depth=string]     [disch=string]     [err=string]     [outwalk=string]
18       [nwalk=integer]    [niter=integer]   [outiter=integer]   [density=inte‐
19       ger]   [diffc=float]    [hmax=float]    [halpha=float]    [hbeta=float]
20       [--overwrite]
21
22   Flags:
23       -m  Multiscale simulation
24
25       -t  Time-series (dynamic) output
26
27       --overwrite
28
29   Parameters:
30       elevin=string
31           Name of the elevation raster file
32
33       dxin=string
34           Name of the x-derivatives raster file
35
36       dyin=string
37           Name of the y-derivatives raster file
38
39       rain=string
40           Name of the rainfall excess raster file
41
42       infil=string
43           Name of the infiltration excess raster file
44
45       traps=string
46           Name of the flow control raster file
47
48       manin=string
49           Name of the Mannings n raster file
50
51       sites=string
52           Name of the site file with x,y locations
53
54       depth=string
55           Output water depth raster file
56
57       disch=string
58           Output water discharge raster file
59
60       err=string
61           Output simulation error raster file
62
63       outwalk=string
64           Name of the output walkers site file
65
66       nwalk=integer
67           Number of walkers Default: 2000000
68
69       niter=integer
70           Number of time iterations (sec.)  Default: 1200
71
72       outiter=integer
73           Time step for saving output maps (sec.)  Default: 300
74
75       density=integer
76           Density of output walkers Default: 200
77
78       diffc=float
79           Water diffusion constant Default: 0.8
80
81       hmax=float
82           Threshold  water  depth (diffusion increases after this water depth
83           is reached) Default: 0.4
84
85       halpha=float
86           Diffusion increase constant Default: 4.0
87
88       hbeta=float
89           Weighting factor for water flow velocity vector Default: 0.5
90

DESCRIPTION

92       r.sim.water is a landscape scale, simulation model of   overland   flow
93       designed  for  spatially  variable  terrain,  soil, cover and  rainfall
94       excess conditions. A 2D shallow water flow is described by the  bivari‐
95       ate  form of Saint Venant equations. The numerical solution is based on
96       the concept of duality between the field and particle representation of
97       the  modeled  quantity.  Green's  function  Monte Carlo method, used to
98       solve the equation, provides robustness necessary for  spatially  vari‐
99       able  conditions and high resolutions   (Mitas and Mitasova 1998).  The
100       key inputs of the model include elevation (elevin  raster  file),  flow
101       gradient  vector  given by first-order partial derivatives of elevation
102       field (dxin and dyin raster files), rainfall excess rate  (rain  raster
103       file)  and a surface  roughness coefficient given by Manning's n (manin
104       raster file). Partial derivatives raster files can  be  computed  along
105       with  the interpolation of a DEM using the -d option in v.surf.rst mod‐
106       ule. If elevation raster is already provided, partial  derivatives  can
107       be computed using r.slope.aspect module.  Partial derivatives determine
108       the direction and magnitude of water flow.   Partial  derivatives  com‐
109       puted  from  terrain  can be modified to include pre-defined water flow
110       (e.g. channels).
111
112       The module automatically converts data from feet to metric system using
113       database/projection information. Rainfall excess is defined as rainfall
114       intensity - infiltration rate.  Rainfall intensities are usually avail‐
115       able from  meteorological  stations. Infiltration rate depends  on soil
116       properties and  land cover. It  varies in space and  time.   For  satu‐
117       rated   soil  and  steady-state   water flow it can be estimated  using
118       saturated hydraulic  conductivity rates  based on field measurements or
119       using reference values which can be found in literature.
120
121       Output  includes  water  depth  raster file depth  in [m], water   dis‐
122       charge raster file disch in [m3/s]. Error of the numerical solution can
123       be  analyzed  using  err  raster file  (the resulting water depth is an
124       average, and err is its RMSE).  Output site file outwalk can be used to
125       analyze and visualize spatial distribution of walkers at different sim‐
126       ulation times (note that the resulting water depth is based on the den‐
127       sity of these walkers). Number of theese output walkers is controled by
128       density parameter, which says  how  many  walkers  used  in  simalution
129       should  be  used  in  the output Duration of simulation is controled by
130       niter parameter.  The default value is 1000 iterations,  to  reach  the
131       steady-state  may  require,  depending  on the time step, complexity of
132       terrain and land cover and size of the area,  several  thousand  itera‐
133       tions.   Output  files  can  be  saved  during simulation using outiter
134       parameter defining the time step for writing output files. This  option
135       requires the time series flag -t. Files are saved with suffix  contain‐
136       ing iteration number (e.g. name.500, name.1000, etc.).
137       Overland flow is routed based  on  partial  derivatives   of  elevation
138       field  or  other  landscape features influencing water flow. Simulation
139       equations include a diffusion  term  (diffc  parameter)  which  enables
140       water  flow  to  overcome elevation depressions or obstacles when water
141       depth exceeds a threshold water depth value (hmax). When it is reached,
142       diffusion  term increases as given by halpha and advection term (direc‐
143       tion of flow) is given as "prevailing" direction of  flow  computed  as
144       average of flow directions from the previous hbetanumber of grid cells.
145

NOTES

147       A  2D  shallow  water flow is described by the  bivariate form of Saint
148       Venant equations (e.g., Julien et al., 1995). The continuity  of  water
149       flow  relation  is  coupled with the momentum conservation equation and
150       for a shallow water overland flow, the hydraulic radius is approximated
151       by  the normal flow depth. The system of  equations is closed using the
152       Manning's relation. Model assumes that the flow is close to  the  kine‐
153       matic  wave  approximation,  but  we  include  a diffusion-like term to
154       incorporate the impact of diffusive wave effects. Such an incorporation
155       of  diffusion  in  the water flow  simulation is not new and  a similar
156       term has been obtained in  derivations of diffusion-advection equations
157       for  overland  flow,  e.g.,  by  Lettenmeier  and  Wood, (1992). In our
158       reformulation,  we simplify the diffusion coefficient to a constant and
159       we use a modified diffusion term.  The diffusion constant which we have
160       used is rather small (approximately one order of magnitude smaller than
161       the reciprocal Manning's  coefficient) and therefore the resulting flow
162       is close to the kinematic regime. However, the diffusion term  improves
163       the  kinematic  solution,  by  overcoming  small shallow pits common in
164       digital elevation models (DEM) and by smoothing out the flow over slope
165       discontinuities  or  abrupt changes in Manning's coefficient (e.g., due
166       to a road, or other anthropogenic changes in elevations or cover).
167
168        Green's function stochastic method of solution. The Saint Venant equa‐
169       tions  are solved by a stochastic method called Monte Carlo (very simi‐
170       lar to Monte Carlo methods in computational fluid dynamics or to  quan‐
171       tum  Monte   Carlo   approaches  for   solving the Schrodinger equation
172       (Schmidt and Ceperley,  1992,  Hammond  et al., 1994; Mitas, 1996)). It
173       is  assumed  that  these equations  are a  representation of stochastic
174       processes with diffusion and drift   components   (Fokker-Planck  equa‐
175       tions).   The Monte Carlo technique has several unique advantages which
176       are becoming   even more important due to new developments in  computer
177       technology.   Perhaps   one of the most significant Monte Carlo proper‐
178       ties  is robustness which enables  us to solve the equations  for  com‐
179       plex   cases,  such as discontinuities in the coefficients of differen‐
180       tial  operators (in our case, abrupt  slope  or  cover  changes,  etc).
181       Also,  rough solutions can be estimated rather quickly,    which allows
182       us to   carry  out  preliminary  quantitative  studies  or  to  rapidly
183       extract   qualitative  trends by parameter scans. In addition, the sto‐
184       chastic     methods are tailored to the new generation of computers  as
185       they provide    scalability from a single workstation to large parallel
186       machines due to   the independence of sampling points.  Therefore,  the
187       methods  are useful  both for everyday exploratory work using a desktop
188       computer and for  large, cutting-edge applications using  high  perfor‐
189       mance computing.
190

SEE ALSO

192       v.surf.rst r.slope.aspect r.sim.sediment
193

AUTHORS

195       Helena Mitasova, Lubos Mitas
196       North Carolina State University
197       hmitaso@unity.ncsu.edu
198       Jaroslav Hofierka
199       GeoModel, s.r.o. Bratislava, Slovakia
200       hofierka@geomodel.sk
201       Chris Thaxton
202       North Carolina State University
203       csthaxto@unity.ncsu.edu
204       csthaxto@unity.ncsu.edu
205

REFERENCES

207       Mitasova,  H.,  Thaxton,  C.,  Hofierka, J., McLaughlin, R., Moore, A.,
208       Mitas L., 2004, Path sampling method for modeling overland water  flow,
209       sediment transport and short term terrain evolution in Open Source GIS.
210       In: C.T. Miller, M.W. Farthing, V.G. Gray, G.F. Pinder  eds.,  Computa‐
211       tional Methods in Water Resources, Elsevier.
212
213       Mitasova  H,  Mitas, L., 2000, Modeling spatial processes in multiscale
214       framework: exploring duality between particles and fields, plenary talk
215       at GIScience2000 conference, Savannah, GA.
216
217       Mitas,  L., and Mitasova, H., 1998, Distributed soil erosion simulation
218       for effective erosion  prevention.  Water  Resources  Research,  34(3),
219       505-516.
220
221       Mitasova,  H., Mitas, L., 2001, Multiscale soil erosion simulations for
222       land use management, In: Landscape erosion and landscape evolution mod‐
223       eling,  Harmon  R.  and Doe W. eds., Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers,
224       pp. 321-347.
225
226       Neteler, M. and Mitasova, H.,  2004,  Open  Source  GIS:  A  GRASS  GIS
227       Approach,  Second  Edition,  Kluwer International Series in Engineering
228       and Computer Science, 773, Kluwer Academic Press  /  Springer,  Boston,
229       Dordrecht, 424 pages.
230
231       Last changed: Date: 2003/11/01 15:55:10 $
232
233GRASS 6.2.2                                                     r.sim.water(1)
Impressum