1IBV_UC_PINGPONG(1) USER COMMANDS IBV_UC_PINGPONG(1)
2
3
4
6 ibv_uc_pingpong - simple InfiniBand UC transport test
7
8
10 ibv_uc_pingpong [-p port] [-d device] [-i ib port] [-s size] [-r rx
11 depth] [-n iters] [-l sl] [-e] HOSTNAME
12
13 ibv_uc_pingpong [-p port] [-d device] [-i ib port] [-s size] [-r rx
14 depth] [-n iters] [-l sl] [-e]
15
16
18 Run a simple ping-pong test over InfiniBand via the reliable connected
19 (RC) transport.
20
21
23 -p, --port=PORT
24 use TCP port PORT for initial synchronization (default 18515)
25
26 -d, --ib-dev=DEVICE
27 use IB device DEVICE (default first device found)
28
29 -i, --ib-port=PORT
30 use IB port PORT (default port 1)
31
32 -s, --size=SIZE
33 ping-pong messages of size SIZE (default 4096)
34
35 -r, --rx-depth=DEPTH
36 post DEPTH receives at a time (default 1000)
37
38 -n, --iters=ITERS
39 perform ITERS message exchanges (default 1000)
40
41 -l, --sl=SL
42 use SL as the service level value of the QP (default 0)
43
44 -e, --events
45 sleep while waiting for work completion events (default is to
46 poll for completions)
47
48
50 ibv_rc_pingpong(1), ibv_ud_pingpong(1), ibv_srq_pingpong(1)
51
52
54 Roland Dreier
55 <rolandd@cisco.com>
56
57
59 The network synchronization between client and server instances is
60 weak, and does not prevent incompatible options from being used on the
61 two instances. The method used for retrieving work completions is not
62 strictly correct, and race conditions may cause failures on some sys‐
63 tems.
64
65
66
67libibverbs August 30, 2005 IBV_UC_PINGPONG(1)