1guestfs-performance(1) Virtualization Support guestfs-performance(1)
2
3
4
6 guestfs-performance - engineering libguestfs for greatest performance
7
9 This page documents how to get the greatest performance out of
10 libguestfs, especially when you expect to use libguestfs to manipulate
11 thousands of virtual machines or disk images.
12
13 Three main areas are covered. Libguestfs runs an appliance (a small
14 Linux distribution) inside qemu/KVM. The first two areas are:
15 minimizing the time taken to start this appliance, and the number of
16 times the appliance has to be started. The third area is shortening
17 the time taken for inspection of VMs.
18
20 Before making changes to how you use libguestfs, take baseline
21 measurements.
22
23 Baseline: Starting the appliance
24 On an unloaded machine, time how long it takes to start up the
25 appliance:
26
27 time guestfish -a /dev/null run
28
29 Run this command several times in a row and discard the first few runs,
30 so that you are measuring a typical "hot cache" case.
31
32 Side note for developers: There is a program called boot-benchmark in
33 https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs-analysis-tools which does the
34 same thing, but performs multiple runs and prints the mean and standard
35 deviation.
36
37 Explanation
38
39 The guestfish command above starts up the libguestfs appliance on a
40 null disk, and then immediately shuts it down. The first time you run
41 the command, it will create an appliance and cache it (usually under
42 /var/tmp/.guestfs-*). Subsequent runs should reuse the cached
43 appliance.
44
45 Expected results
46
47 You should expect to be getting times under 6 seconds. If the times
48 you see on an unloaded machine are above this, then see the section
49 "TROUBLESHOOTING POOR PERFORMANCE" below.
50
51 Baseline: Performing inspection of a guest
52 For this test you will need an unloaded machine and at least one real
53 guest or disk image. If you are planning to use libguestfs against
54 only X guests (eg. X = Windows), then using an X guest here would be
55 most appropriate. If you are planning to run libguestfs against a mix
56 of guests, then use a mix of guests for testing here.
57
58 Time how long it takes to perform inspection and mount the disks of the
59 guest. Use the first command if you will be using disk images, and the
60 second command if you will be using libvirt.
61
62 time guestfish --ro -a disk.img -i exit
63
64 time guestfish --ro -d GuestName -i exit
65
66 Run the command several times in a row and discard the first few runs,
67 so that you are measuring a typical "hot cache" case.
68
69 Explanation
70
71 This command starts up the libguestfs appliance on the named disk image
72 or libvirt guest, performs libguestfs inspection on it (see
73 "INSPECTION" in guestfs(3)), mounts the guest’s disks, then discards
74 all these results and shuts down.
75
76 The first time you run the command, it will create an appliance and
77 cache it (usually under /var/tmp/.guestfs-*). Subsequent runs should
78 reuse the cached appliance.
79
80 Expected results
81
82 You should expect times which are ≤ 5 seconds greater than measured in
83 the first baseline test above. (For example, if the first baseline
84 test ran in 5 seconds, then this test should run in ≤ 10 seconds).
85
87 The first time you use libguestfs, it will build and cache an
88 appliance. This is usually in /var/tmp/.guestfs-*, unless you have set
89 $TMPDIR or $LIBGUESTFS_CACHEDIR in which case it will be under that
90 temporary directory.
91
92 For more information about how the appliance is constructed, see
93 "SUPERMIN APPLIANCES" in supermin(1).
94
95 Every time libguestfs runs it will check that no host files used by the
96 appliance have changed. If any have, then the appliance is rebuilt.
97 This usually happens when a package is installed or updated on the host
98 (eg. using programs like "yum" or "apt-get"). The reason for
99 reconstructing the appliance is security: the new program that has been
100 installed might contain a security fix, and so we want to include the
101 fixed program in the appliance automatically.
102
103 These are the performance implications:
104
105 • The process of building (or rebuilding) the cached appliance is
106 slow, and you can avoid this happening by using a fixed appliance
107 (see below).
108
109 • If not using a fixed appliance, be aware that updating software on
110 the host will cause a one time rebuild of the appliance.
111
112 • /var/tmp (or $TMPDIR, $LIBGUESTFS_CACHEDIR) should be on a fast
113 disk, and have plenty of space for the appliance.
114
116 To fully control when the appliance is built, you can build a fixed
117 appliance. This appliance should be stored on a fast local disk.
118
119 To build the appliance, run the command:
120
121 libguestfs-make-fixed-appliance <directory>
122
123 replacing "<directory>" with the name of a directory where the
124 appliance will be stored (normally you would name a subdirectory, for
125 example: /usr/local/lib/guestfs/appliance or /dev/shm/appliance).
126
127 Then set $LIBGUESTFS_PATH (and ensure this environment variable is set
128 in your libguestfs program), or modify your program so it calls
129 "guestfs_set_path". For example:
130
131 export LIBGUESTFS_PATH=/usr/local/lib/guestfs/appliance
132
133 Now you can run libguestfs programs, virt tools, guestfish etc. as
134 normal. The programs will use your fixed appliance, and will not ever
135 build, rebuild, or cache their own appliance.
136
137 (For detailed information on this subject, see:
138 libguestfs-make-fixed-appliance(1)).
139
140 Performance of the fixed appliance
141 In our testing we did not find that using a fixed appliance gave any
142 measurable performance benefit, even when the appliance was located in
143 memory (ie. on /dev/shm). However there are two points to consider:
144
145 1. Using a fixed appliance stops libguestfs from ever rebuilding the
146 appliance, meaning that libguestfs will have more predictable
147 start-up times.
148
149 2. The appliance is loaded on demand. A simple test such as:
150
151 time guestfish -a /dev/null run
152
153 does not load very much of the appliance. A real libguestfs
154 program using complicated API calls would demand-load a lot more of
155 the appliance. Being able to store the appliance in a specified
156 location makes the performance more predictable.
157
159 By far the most effective, though not always the simplest way to get
160 good performance is to ensure that the appliance is launched the
161 minimum number of times. This will probably involve changing your
162 libguestfs application.
163
164 Try to call "guestfs_launch" at most once per target virtual machine or
165 disk image.
166
167 Instead of using a separate instance of guestfish(1) to make a series
168 of changes to the same guest, use a single instance of guestfish and/or
169 use the guestfish --listen option.
170
171 Consider writing your program as a daemon which holds a guest open
172 while making a series of changes. Or marshal all the operations you
173 want to perform before opening the guest.
174
175 You can also try adding disks from multiple guests to a single
176 appliance. Before trying this, note the following points:
177
178 1. Adding multiple guests to one appliance is a security problem
179 because it may allow one guest to interfere with the disks of
180 another guest. Only do it if you trust all the guests, or if you
181 can group guests by trust.
182
183 2. There is a hard limit to the number of disks you can add to a
184 single appliance. Call "guestfs_max_disks" in guestfs(3) to get
185 this limit. For further information see "LIMITS" in guestfs(3).
186
187 3. Using libguestfs this way is complicated. Disks can have
188 unexpected interactions: for example, if two guests use the same
189 UUID for a filesystem (because they were cloned), or have volume
190 groups with the same name (but see "guestfs_lvm_set_filter").
191
192 virt-df(1) adds multiple disks by default, so the source code for this
193 program would be a good place to start.
194
196 The main advice is obvious: Do not perform inspection (which is
197 expensive) unless you need the results.
198
199 If you previously performed inspection on the guest, then it may be
200 safe to cache and reuse the results from last time.
201
202 Some disks don’t need to be inspected at all: for example, if you are
203 creating a disk image, or if the disk image is not a VM, or if the disk
204 image has a known layout.
205
206 Even when basic inspection ("guestfs_inspect_os") is required,
207 auxiliary inspection operations may be avoided:
208
209 • Mounting disks is only necessary to get further filesystem
210 information.
211
212 • Listing applications ("guestfs_inspect_list_applications") is an
213 expensive operation on Linux, but almost free on Windows.
214
215 • Generating a guest icon ("guestfs_inspect_get_icon") is cheap on
216 Linux but expensive on Windows.
217
219 Libguestfs appliances are mostly I/O bound and you can launch multiple
220 appliances in parallel. Provided there is enough free memory, there
221 should be little difference in launching 1 appliance vs N appliances in
222 parallel.
223
224 On a 2-core (4-thread) laptop with 16 GB of RAM, using the (not
225 especially realistic) test Perl script below, the following plot shows
226 excellent scalability when running between 1 and 20 appliances in
227 parallel:
228
229 12 ++---+----+----+----+-----+----+----+----+----+---++
230 + + + + + + + + + + *
231 | |
232 | * |
233 11 ++ ++
234 | |
235 | |
236 | * * |
237 10 ++ ++
238 | * |
239 | |
240 s | |
241 9 ++ ++
242 e | |
243 | * |
244 c | |
245 8 ++ * ++
246 o | * |
247 | |
248 n 7 ++ ++
249 | * |
250 d | * |
251 | |
252 s 6 ++ ++
253 | * * |
254 | * |
255 | |
256 5 ++ ++
257 | |
258 | * |
259 | * * |
260 4 ++ ++
261 | |
262 | |
263 + * * * + + + + + + + +
264 3 ++-*-+----+----+----+-----+----+----+----+----+---++
265 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
266 number of parallel appliances
267
268 It is possible to run many more than 20 appliances in parallel, but if
269 you are using the libvirt backend then you should be aware that out of
270 the box libvirt limits the number of client connections to 20.
271
272 The simple Perl script below was used to collect the data for the plot
273 above, but there is much more information on this subject, including
274 more advanced test scripts and graphs, available in the following blog
275 postings:
276
277 http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/multiple-libguestfs-appliances-in-parallel-part-1/
278 http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/multiple-libguestfs-appliances-in-parallel-part-2/
279 http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/multiple-libguestfs-appliances-in-parallel-part-3/
280 http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/multiple-libguestfs-appliances-in-parallel-part-4/
281
282 #!/usr/bin/env perl
283
284 use strict;
285 use threads;
286 use warnings;
287 use Sys::Guestfs;
288 use Time::HiRes qw(time);
289
290 sub test {
291 my $g = Sys::Guestfs->new;
292 $g->add_drive_ro ("/dev/null");
293 $g->launch ();
294
295 # You could add some work for libguestfs to do here.
296
297 $g->close ();
298 }
299
300 # Get everything into cache.
301 test (); test (); test ();
302
303 for my $nr_threads (1..20) {
304 my $start_t = time ();
305 my @threads;
306 foreach (1..$nr_threads) {
307 push @threads, threads->create (\&test)
308 }
309 foreach (@threads) {
310 $_->join ();
311 if (my $err = $_->error ()) {
312 die "launch failed with $nr_threads threads: $err"
313 }
314 }
315 my $end_t = time ();
316 printf ("%d %.2f\n", $nr_threads, $end_t - $start_t);
317 }
318
320 Ensure hardware virtualization is available
321 Use /proc/cpuinfo to ensure that hardware virtualization is available.
322 Note that you may need to enable it in your BIOS.
323
324 Hardware virt is not usually available inside VMs, and libguestfs will
325 run slowly inside another virtual machine whatever you do. Nested
326 virtualization does not work well in our experience, and is certainly
327 no substitute for running libguestfs on baremetal.
328
329 Ensure KVM is available
330 Ensure that KVM is enabled and available to the user that will run
331 libguestfs. It should be safe to set 0666 permissions on /dev/kvm and
332 most distributions now do this.
333
334 Processors to avoid
335 Avoid processors that don’t have hardware virtualization, and some
336 processors which are simply very slow (AMD Geode being a great
337 example).
338
339 Xen dom0
340 In Xen, dom0 is a virtual machine, and so hardware virtualization is
341 not available.
342
343 Use libguestfs ≥ 1.34 and qemu ≥ 2.7
344 During the libguestfs 1.33 development cycle, we spent a large amount
345 of time concentrating on boot performance, and added some patches to
346 libguestfs, qemu and Linux which in some cases can reduce boot times to
347 well under 1 second. You may therefore get much better performance by
348 moving to the versions of libguestfs or qemu mentioned in the heading.
349
351 Boot analysis
352 In https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs-analysis-tools is a program
353 called "boot-analysis". This program is able to produce a very
354 detailed breakdown of the boot steps (eg. qemu, BIOS, kernel,
355 libguestfs init script), and can measure how long it takes to perform
356 each step.
357
358 Detailed timings using ts
359 Use the ts(1) command (from moreutils) to show detailed timings:
360
361 $ guestfish -a /dev/null run -v |& ts -i '%.s'
362 0.000022 libguestfs: launch: program=guestfish
363 0.000134 libguestfs: launch: version=1.29.31fedora=23,release=2.fc23,libvirt
364 0.000044 libguestfs: launch: backend registered: unix
365 0.000035 libguestfs: launch: backend registered: uml
366 0.000035 libguestfs: launch: backend registered: libvirt
367 0.000032 libguestfs: launch: backend registered: direct
368 0.000030 libguestfs: launch: backend=libvirt
369 0.000031 libguestfs: launch: tmpdir=/tmp/libguestfsw18rBQ
370 0.000029 libguestfs: launch: umask=0002
371 0.000031 libguestfs: launch: euid=1000
372 0.000030 libguestfs: libvirt version = 1002012 (1.2.12)
373 [etc]
374
375 The timestamps are seconds (incrementally since the previous line).
376
377 Detailed debugging using gdb
378 You can attach to the appliance BIOS/kernel using gdb. If you know
379 what you're doing, this can be a useful way to diagnose boot
380 regressions.
381
382 Firstly, you have to change qemu so it runs with the "-S" and "-s"
383 options. These options cause qemu to pause at boot and allow you to
384 attach a debugger. Read qemu(1) for further information. Libguestfs
385 invokes qemu several times (to scan the help output and so on) and you
386 only want the final invocation of qemu to use these options, so use a
387 qemu wrapper script like this:
388
389 #!/bin/bash -
390
391 # Set this to point to the real qemu binary.
392 qemu=/usr/bin/qemu-kvm
393
394 if [ "$1" != "-global" ]; then
395 # Scanning help output etc.
396 exec $qemu "$@"
397 else
398 # Really running qemu.
399 exec $qemu -S -s "$@"
400 fi
401
402 Now run guestfish or another libguestfs tool with the qemu wrapper (see
403 "QEMU WRAPPERS" in guestfs(3) to understand what this is doing):
404
405 LIBGUESTFS_HV=/path/to/qemu-wrapper guestfish -a /dev/null -v run
406
407 This should pause just after qemu launches. In another window, attach
408 to qemu using gdb:
409
410 $ gdb
411 (gdb) set architecture i8086
412 The target architecture is assumed to be i8086
413 (gdb) target remote :1234
414 Remote debugging using :1234
415 0x0000fff0 in ?? ()
416 (gdb) cont
417
418 At this point you can use standard gdb techniques, eg. hitting "^C" to
419 interrupt the boot and "bt" get a stack trace, setting breakpoints,
420 etc. Note that when you are past the BIOS and into the Linux kernel,
421 you'll want to change the architecture back to 32 or 64 bit.
422
424 Sometimes performance regressions happen in other programs (eg. qemu,
425 the kernel) that cause problems for libguestfs.
426
427 In https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs-analysis-tools
428 boot-benchmark/boot-benchmark-range.pl is a script which can be used to
429 benchmark libguestfs across a range of git commits in another project
430 to find out if any commit is causing a slowdown (or speedup).
431
432 To find out how to use this script, consult the manual:
433
434 ./boot-benchmark/boot-benchmark-range.pl --man
435
437 supermin(1), guestfish(1), guestfs(3), guestfs-examples(3),
438 guestfs-internals(1), libguestfs-make-fixed-appliance(1), stap(1),
439 qemu(1), gdb(1), http://libguestfs.org/.
440
442 Richard W.M. Jones ("rjones at redhat dot com")
443
445 Copyright (C) 2012-2023 Red Hat Inc.
446
448 This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
449 under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published
450 by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
451 (at your option) any later version.
452
453 This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
454 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
455 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
456 Lesser General Public License for more details.
457
458 You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
459 License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
460 Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
461 02110-1301 USA
462
464 To get a list of bugs against libguestfs, use this link:
465 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=libguestfs&product=Virtualization+Tools
466
467 To report a new bug against libguestfs, use this link:
468 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?component=libguestfs&product=Virtualization+Tools
469
470 When reporting a bug, please supply:
471
472 • The version of libguestfs.
473
474 • Where you got libguestfs (eg. which Linux distro, compiled from
475 source, etc)
476
477 • Describe the bug accurately and give a way to reproduce it.
478
479 • Run libguestfs-test-tool(1) and paste the complete, unedited output
480 into the bug report.
481
482
483
484libguestfs-1.51.9 2023-12-09 guestfs-performance(1)