1PERLLOL(1) Perl Programmers Reference Guide PERLLOL(1)
2
3
4
6 perllol - Manipulating Arrays of Arrays in Perl
7
9 Declaration and Access of Arrays of Arrays
10
11 The simplest thing to build is an array of arrays (sometimes impre‐
12 cisely called a list of lists). It's reasonably easy to understand,
13 and almost everything that applies here will also be applicable later
14 on with the fancier data structures.
15
16 An array of an array is just a regular old array @AoA that you can get
17 at with two subscripts, like $AoA[3][2]. Here's a declaration of the
18 array:
19
20 # assign to our array, an array of array references
21 @AoA = (
22 [ "fred", "barney" ],
23 [ "george", "jane", "elroy" ],
24 [ "homer", "marge", "bart" ],
25 );
26
27 print $AoA[2][2];
28 bart
29
30 Now you should be very careful that the outer bracket type is a round
31 one, that is, a parenthesis. That's because you're assigning to an
32 @array, so you need parentheses. If you wanted there not to be an
33 @AoA, but rather just a reference to it, you could do something more
34 like this:
35
36 # assign a reference to array of array references
37 $ref_to_AoA = [
38 [ "fred", "barney", "pebbles", "bambam", "dino", ],
39 [ "homer", "bart", "marge", "maggie", ],
40 [ "george", "jane", "elroy", "judy", ],
41 ];
42
43 print $ref_to_AoA->[2][2];
44
45 Notice that the outer bracket type has changed, and so our access syn‐
46 tax has also changed. That's because unlike C, in perl you can't
47 freely interchange arrays and references thereto. $ref_to_AoA is a
48 reference to an array, whereas @AoA is an array proper. Likewise,
49 $AoA[2] is not an array, but an array ref. So how come you can write
50 these:
51
52 $AoA[2][2]
53 $ref_to_AoA->[2][2]
54
55 instead of having to write these:
56
57 $AoA[2]->[2]
58 $ref_to_AoA->[2]->[2]
59
60 Well, that's because the rule is that on adjacent brackets only
61 (whether square or curly), you are free to omit the pointer dereferenc‐
62 ing arrow. But you cannot do so for the very first one if it's a
63 scalar containing a reference, which means that $ref_to_AoA always
64 needs it.
65
66 Growing Your Own
67
68 That's all well and good for declaration of a fixed data structure, but
69 what if you wanted to add new elements on the fly, or build it up
70 entirely from scratch?
71
72 First, let's look at reading it in from a file. This is something like
73 adding a row at a time. We'll assume that there's a flat file in which
74 each line is a row and each word an element. If you're trying to
75 develop an @AoA array containing all these, here's the right way to do
76 that:
77
78 while (<>) {
79 @tmp = split;
80 push @AoA, [ @tmp ];
81 }
82
83 You might also have loaded that from a function:
84
85 for $i ( 1 .. 10 ) {
86 $AoA[$i] = [ somefunc($i) ];
87 }
88
89 Or you might have had a temporary variable sitting around with the
90 array in it.
91
92 for $i ( 1 .. 10 ) {
93 @tmp = somefunc($i);
94 $AoA[$i] = [ @tmp ];
95 }
96
97 It's very important that you make sure to use the "[]" array reference
98 constructor. That's because this will be very wrong:
99
100 $AoA[$i] = @tmp;
101
102 You see, assigning a named array like that to a scalar just counts the
103 number of elements in @tmp, which probably isn't what you want.
104
105 If you are running under "use strict", you'll have to add some declara‐
106 tions to make it happy:
107
108 use strict;
109 my(@AoA, @tmp);
110 while (<>) {
111 @tmp = split;
112 push @AoA, [ @tmp ];
113 }
114
115 Of course, you don't need the temporary array to have a name at all:
116
117 while (<>) {
118 push @AoA, [ split ];
119 }
120
121 You also don't have to use push(). You could just make a direct
122 assignment if you knew where you wanted to put it:
123
124 my (@AoA, $i, $line);
125 for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) {
126 $line = <>;
127 $AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', $line ];
128 }
129
130 or even just
131
132 my (@AoA, $i);
133 for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) {
134 $AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', <> ];
135 }
136
137 You should in general be leery of using functions that could poten‐
138 tially return lists in scalar context without explicitly stating such.
139 This would be clearer to the casual reader:
140
141 my (@AoA, $i);
142 for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) {
143 $AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', scalar(<>) ];
144 }
145
146 If you wanted to have a $ref_to_AoA variable as a reference to an
147 array, you'd have to do something like this:
148
149 while (<>) {
150 push @$ref_to_AoA, [ split ];
151 }
152
153 Now you can add new rows. What about adding new columns? If you're
154 dealing with just matrices, it's often easiest to use simple assign‐
155 ment:
156
157 for $x (1 .. 10) {
158 for $y (1 .. 10) {
159 $AoA[$x][$y] = func($x, $y);
160 }
161 }
162
163 for $x ( 3, 7, 9 ) {
164 $AoA[$x][20] += func2($x);
165 }
166
167 It doesn't matter whether those elements are already there or not:
168 it'll gladly create them for you, setting intervening elements to
169 "undef" as need be.
170
171 If you wanted just to append to a row, you'd have to do something a bit
172 funnier looking:
173
174 # add new columns to an existing row
175 push @{ $AoA[0] }, "wilma", "betty";
176
177 Notice that I couldn't say just:
178
179 push $AoA[0], "wilma", "betty"; # WRONG!
180
181 In fact, that wouldn't even compile. How come? Because the argument
182 to push() must be a real array, not just a reference to such.
183
184 Access and Printing
185
186 Now it's time to print your data structure out. How are you going to
187 do that? Well, if you want only one of the elements, it's trivial:
188
189 print $AoA[0][0];
190
191 If you want to print the whole thing, though, you can't say
192
193 print @AoA; # WRONG
194
195 because you'll get just references listed, and perl will never automat‐
196 ically dereference things for you. Instead, you have to roll yourself
197 a loop or two. This prints the whole structure, using the shell-style
198 for() construct to loop across the outer set of subscripts.
199
200 for $aref ( @AoA ) {
201 print "\t [ @$aref ],\n";
202 }
203
204 If you wanted to keep track of subscripts, you might do this:
205
206 for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) {
207 print "\t elt $i is [ @{$AoA[$i]} ],\n";
208 }
209
210 or maybe even this. Notice the inner loop.
211
212 for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) {
213 for $j ( 0 .. $#{$AoA[$i]} ) {
214 print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n";
215 }
216 }
217
218 As you can see, it's getting a bit complicated. That's why sometimes
219 is easier to take a temporary on your way through:
220
221 for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) {
222 $aref = $AoA[$i];
223 for $j ( 0 .. $#{$aref} ) {
224 print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n";
225 }
226 }
227
228 Hmm... that's still a bit ugly. How about this:
229
230 for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) {
231 $aref = $AoA[$i];
232 $n = @$aref - 1;
233 for $j ( 0 .. $n ) {
234 print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n";
235 }
236 }
237
238 Slices
239
240 If you want to get at a slice (part of a row) in a multidimensional
241 array, you're going to have to do some fancy subscripting. That's
242 because while we have a nice synonym for single elements via the
243 pointer arrow for dereferencing, no such convenience exists for slices.
244 (Remember, of course, that you can always write a loop to do a slice
245 operation.)
246
247 Here's how to do one operation using a loop. We'll assume an @AoA
248 variable as before.
249
250 @part = ();
251 $x = 4;
252 for ($y = 7; $y < 13; $y++) {
253 push @part, $AoA[$x][$y];
254 }
255
256 That same loop could be replaced with a slice operation:
257
258 @part = @{ $AoA[4] } [ 7..12 ];
259
260 but as you might well imagine, this is pretty rough on the reader.
261
262 Ah, but what if you wanted a two-dimensional slice, such as having $x
263 run from 4..8 and $y run from 7 to 12? Hmm... here's the simple way:
264
265 @newAoA = ();
266 for ($startx = $x = 4; $x <= 8; $x++) {
267 for ($starty = $y = 7; $y <= 12; $y++) {
268 $newAoA[$x - $startx][$y - $starty] = $AoA[$x][$y];
269 }
270 }
271
272 We can reduce some of the looping through slices
273
274 for ($x = 4; $x <= 8; $x++) {
275 push @newAoA, [ @{ $AoA[$x] } [ 7..12 ] ];
276 }
277
278 If you were into Schwartzian Transforms, you would probably have
279 selected map for that
280
281 @newAoA = map { [ @{ $AoA[$_] } [ 7..12 ] ] } 4 .. 8;
282
283 Although if your manager accused of seeking job security (or rapid
284 insecurity) through inscrutable code, it would be hard to argue. :-) If
285 I were you, I'd put that in a function:
286
287 @newAoA = splice_2D( \@AoA, 4 => 8, 7 => 12 );
288 sub splice_2D {
289 my $lrr = shift; # ref to array of array refs!
290 my ($x_lo, $x_hi,
291 $y_lo, $y_hi) = @_;
292
293 return map {
294 [ @{ $lrr->[$_] } [ $y_lo .. $y_hi ] ]
295 } $x_lo .. $x_hi;
296 }
297
299 perldata(1), perlref(1), perldsc(1)
300
302 Tom Christiansen <tchrist@perl.com>
303
304 Last update: Thu Jun 4 16:16:23 MDT 1998
305
306
307
308perl v5.8.8 2006-01-07 PERLLOL(1)